Re: Who here is chelating themselves and corresponding with the group (S*)

[Guest guest]

Pam,

I'll try to follow your posts better as well, whether you choose to identify

yourself particulary for as much or not.. . (That should be your call, but who

else's? .. . I would get something from it either way?!.

You moderate me by as much as you do, well, you understand

Mike

I might be losing the star after today, as I told my wife we'd only try this

thing for 10 weeks with our son, if she would go along with that.. . We're not

getting anything particulary improving with him. Where you wanted to Know?!.

(But he still can't write for himself?) We could start up with him again later.

What I gather here could make a difference in that respect, but what else

?!.

> > > >

> > > > Hello,

> > > >

> > > > I'm aware many here are chelating or trying to chelate another. I was

wondering who here is chelating themselves (as best they can?) and corresponding

with this group that we might better evaluate (see for ourselves?) the results

of such objectivity? (That anything could be more reasonable to be asking and

doing for as much, of understanding more for our selves? .. . (That anything

else should or would matter so much of the *justness* of as much, that there

would or could be any other, or that we should need or be part of a group or

society otherwise? that wouldn't be part of the problem?

> > > >

> > > > Glavic

> > > >

> > > > Who here is chelating themselves and corresponding with the/this group

with respect to science? (that there be any science if not such science anywhere

else? If there is, point me there?

> > > >

> > > > On The facts, that there should be any another, or we may not be about

them so much? that anything else should be the criteria of performance and

success, but I Feel there isn't? .. .

> > > >

> > > > The question still stands for my primary interest in this group

> > > >

> > > > Don't be abusive otherwise. I do ignore (somewhat extinguish? of how I

extinguish/prosecute/punish those not so reasonable, with me? for me?) others

where I feel they are not actually communicating or trying to communicate, (what

is so symbolic? of value?) that I don't recommend that for all of us here, (of

such facts if not what is so primary, if not of the evidence of what we are

doing or trying to do? more meaningfully? as justly?) but I really do

> > > >

> > > > That such a group survives and grows would be great with me, and not so

much otherwise

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

In that context (if not entirely yours, Pam) I may not pull my son off chelation

entirely but rather take an extra week off for the cleaning and resting and

recharging phase of the cycle, ie., I'm going to go with 3 days on and 11 days

off rather than 3 days on and 4 days off as I was previously doing (if I can get

my wife to co-operate with as much, and my memory of as much doesn't fail me.. .

I have a memory for other things? .. . You want to believe It (as a figure of

speech? .. .

Glavic

To those who think I should go elsewhere on the matter of justice (and politics?

me, an individual first? political? let's be *fair* about as much if not more of

everything? [of who would be the political one in that picture, of censoring or

trying to censor Individual representation? Sheesh?!. On the moderator move some

were trying to make otherwise?] by trying to understand more for our selves? in

representing ourselves if not as much? of as much I am, and maybe the opposite

of political, do you think?!.)

Being just (so just?) and serving justice is our social responsibility to each

other, (more than any other?) where everything pales and would pale to black

otherwise, I Feel as understand

I'm feeling that justice and serving individual justice is the opposite of what

is political and so abusive, for anyone who wants to understand where I'm coming

from and going? .. .

of being such legend in my own mind am I? .. . Aaaaaaah, of what I wish for

*you,* of such feeling/s, now and again.. .

I've never found people to be attracted to intelligence especially, but the

justice of as much if not of everything, Thereof? aaaaahh, that anything else

should matter.. . that I should care for people and society and the social

otherwise? or, what do you think I'm chelating *for,* Hello? (that you or anyone

else would know what health is better than I can Feel It, Thereof?) Of such

criteria I Am, I Feel I Am, Thereof

Oh, that's relevent, (I Feel) that anything else would be relevent of society

and what could be so, social? .. . that justness wouldn't make it so (if not

better than it is?) I Feel as understand, and wish as much for Us.. .

On the new and developing if not advancing criteria of success I Am, I Feel I

Am, Thereof

Bear with me in that respect, or be part of my problem, otherwise

That wan't meant for Pam, or anyone else, in a hostile way (no, but in the best

most considerate most just way I figure.. .

Far be It, but for justice if not such justness, that everything else would be

so meaningful and just, of, if it is to be it is up to *Us,* (you and me!)

Thereof, I Feel as understand

I believe chelation can only be a means to such end, (that that wouldn't be The

thing, but I Feel It Is!) where the means and only the means can justify the

end, (opposite of the political?) and everything else, is somewhat of the

problem, (with principle if not such principle?) so, yes, I'm introducing this

as an element (so primary?) to making the A/C the better if not more meaningful

if not more just (as for justice itself) protocol, that anything else should

matter or that anything better has come along? in that respect?

It's always nice to tie things up so reasonably for as much (a/The greater

understanding?) I figure?!. By all means still call it the A/C protocol however

it is advancing in that respect? .. . (Again, I'm not the one trying to make a

name for myself.... so much as being about something more meaningful, Hello, or

why bother with chelation) where The choice/s become ours, of Us, of much, (of

such intelligence if not truth) of Feeling as Understanding, More, no less, that

there would be any other understanding, but I Feel there wouldn't be.. .

On how everything so meaningful connects? That I'm trying to be like everyone

else not as much of as much.. .

Yes, the opposite of politics is justice if not the justice of as much, of

individual justice, that any other would make sense (if not such intervention

accomodating of as much? of the Individual *not* so much of politics if at all

of politics when for Justice) I Feel as Understand. And where it wouldn't I

would have less use for it of it being not so, Integrating? for a greater

understanding, (of More) of such facts, be sure. I wish us well, Thereof

No, that wouldn't be me trying to win a popularity contest, being and feeling so

just as I Feel *I* Am

I'll try to keep us posted on this Integrating/Understanding thing?!. of such

facts, Thereof

Cherrio?!.

> > >

> > > Hello,

> > >

> > > I'm aware many here are chelating or trying to chelate another. I was

wondering

> > >who here is chelating themselves (as best they can?) and corresponding with

this

> > >group that we might better evaluate (see for ourselves?) the results of

such

> > >objectivity? (That anything could be more reasonable to be asking and doing

for

> > >as much, of understanding more for our selves? .. . (That anything else

should

> > >or would matter so much of the *justness* of as much, that there would or

could

> > >be any other, or that we should need or be part of a group or society

otherwise?

> > >that wouldn't be part of the problem?

> > >

> > > Glavic

> > >

> > > Who here is chelating themselves and corresponding with the/this group

with

> > >respect to science? (that there be any science if not such science anywhere

> > >else? If there is, point me there?

> > >

> > > On The facts, that there should be any another, or we may not be about

them so

> > >much? that anything else should be the criteria of performance and success,

but

> > >I Feel there isn't? .. .

> > >

> > > The question still stands for my primary interest in this group

> > >

> > > Don't be abusive otherwise. I do ignore (somewhat extinguish? of how I

> > >extinguish/prosecute/punish those not so reasonable, with me? for me?)

others

> > >where I feel they are not actually communicating or trying to communicate,

(what

> > >is so symbolic? of value?) that I don't recommend that for all of us here,

(of

> > >such facts if not what is so primary, if not of the evidence of what we are

> > >doing or trying to do? more meaningfully? as justly?) but I really do

> > >

> > > That such a group survives and grows would be great with me, and not so

much

> > >otherwise

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

I set a timer for every 3 hours so I don't have to remember. It makes it easy

to remember the night dose also.

Deb

> > > >

> > > > Hello,

> > > >

> > > > I'm aware many here are chelating or trying to chelate another. I was

wondering

> > > >who here is chelating themselves (as best they can?) and corresponding

with this

> > > >group that we might better evaluate (see for ourselves?) the results of

such

> > > >objectivity? (That anything could be more reasonable to be asking and

doing for

> > > >as much, of understanding more for our selves? .. . (That anything else

should

> > > >or would matter so much of the *justness* of as much, that there would or

could

> > > >be any other, or that we should need or be part of a group or society

otherwise?

> > > >that wouldn't be part of the problem?

> > > >

> > > > Glavic

> > > >

> > > > Who here is chelating themselves and corresponding with the/this group

with

> > > >respect to science? (that there be any science if not such science

anywhere

> > > >else? If there is, point me there?

> > > >

> > > > On The facts, that there should be any another, or we may not be about

them so

> > > >much? that anything else should be the criteria of performance and

success, but

> > > >I Feel there isn't? .. .

> > > >

> > > > The question still stands for my primary interest in this group

> > > >

> > > > Don't be abusive otherwise. I do ignore (somewhat extinguish? of how I

> > > >extinguish/prosecute/punish those not so reasonable, with me? for me?)

others

> > > >where I feel they are not actually communicating or trying to

communicate, (what

> > > >is so symbolic? of value?) that I don't recommend that for all of us

here, (of

> > > >such facts if not what is so primary, if not of the evidence of what we

are

> > > >doing or trying to do? more meaningfully? as justly?) but I really do

> > > >

> > > > That such a group survives and grows would be great with me, and not so

much

> > > >otherwise

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

[Guest guest]

I have chelated myself in the past, but am currently breastfeeding my 7 month

old baby, so will have to wait a while to get back to it. I'm chelating my 9

year old son with ASD. I noticed lots of brain fog (still have it) when I was

reading about the autism treatment connection when my son was diagnosed. I have a

very poor memory now, whereas as a child and in high school I had a very good

memory. I would have liked to have chelated longer, but I've had two kids

since then, and between pregnancies and nursing...

The good thing is that my second son is NT (I had my mercury fillings removed

before I had him, but didn't get to chelate myself before I was pregnant) and my

baby daughter is NT so far and hopefully she'll stay that way (not vaccinating

either of them, and didn't have vaccines when pregnant, even though it was

during the OMG! H1N1 hysteria last fall.