Guest guest Posted February 23, 2010 Report Share Posted February 23, 2010 In a message dated 23/02/2010 17:49:36 GMT Standard Time, stacy171@... writes: So, if using ALA as an antioxidant, I guess you should still follow an appropriate chelation protocol since you'll get metal distribution otherwise??? >>yes Mandi in UK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 23, 2010 Report Share Posted February 23, 2010 Hi, Maybe you all could help me think this through. I'm curious whether the improvements seen with ALA use come from it's role an an antioxidant rather than as a chelator. I'm looking into a possible mitochondrial condition with my son and I'm noticing that lots of regular mainstream doctors recommend ALA for these conditions. So, if using ALA as an antioxidant, I guess you should still follow an appropriate chelation protocol since you'll get metal distribution otherwise??? Thanks, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 23, 2010 Report Share Posted February 23, 2010 > > Hi, > > Maybe you all could help me think this through. I'm curious whether the improvements seen with ALA use come from it's role an an antioxidant rather than as a chelator. I'm looking into a possible mitochondrial condition with my son and I'm noticing that lots of regular mainstream doctors recommend ALA for these conditions. > Did you do an essential elements hair test and what did that show? > So, if using ALA as an antioxidant, I guess you should still follow an appropriate chelation protocol since you'll get metal distribution otherwise??? > Right. Most people in our society have been exposed to heavy metals and that means that we all need to use ALA at 3 h intervals (or less) in order to get a net movement of metals out of the body and brain. When ALA is used at high infrequent doses it will force metals INTO the brain leading to long term worsening. Andy often says that the chemicals do what they do based on natural laws and do not do what they do based on what a doctor thinks they might do. That means that the ALA will act as a chelator even if the doctor does not know that's what it does or intend it to chelate. J > Thanks, > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 23, 2010 Report Share Posted February 23, 2010 If a person is mercury toxic you cannot use ALA as an antioxidant, you need to follow a chelation schedule and take breaks. TJ ________________________________ From: stacy171 <stacy171@...> Sent: Tue, February 23, 2010 9:46:10 AM Subject: [ ] ALA as antioxidant rather than chelator  Hi, Maybe you all could help me think this through. I'm curious whether the improvements seen with ALA use come from it's role an an antioxidant rather than as a chelator. I'm looking into a possible mitochondrial condition with my son and I'm noticing that lots of regular mainstream doctors recommend ALA for these conditions. So, if using ALA as an antioxidant, I guess you should still follow an appropriate chelation protocol since you'll get metal distribution otherwise??? Thanks, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.