toxic overload: Why has the War on Cancer Failed so Miserably?

[Guest guest]

Sorry for deluge of emails, but just synchronistic that these topics

surfaced today when I had another toxic overlaod reaction to chemical scents

from visitor in my home. I REALLY would like to be able to connect with more

people, but I'm finding my own relatives and dear friends are using such

toxic products that I literally cannot allow them in my presence. This makes

me feel enormously sad, but even more enormously concerned for THEIR health

and safety. It's amazing to me that folks can live in such a strong toxic

soup and not realize it. That means to me that the toxins have already

severely damaged their sense of smell that would normally alert them to the

danger of those chemicals. Many of these synthetic chemicals are

NEURO-TOXINS--they can damage our nervous system and senses, rendering us

numb to the danger.

Now just read article that expresses what I've also seen in visions about

the effects of all these toxins.

With deep compassion for all living beings,

May all be well.

~~~Kendra~~~

===

" One would think that applying all that modern science has to offer over the

last 40 years would have brought us far closer to eradicating cancer. Just

compare it to other technology areas. Our cell phones now are more powerful

computers than the largest supercomputers of the time.

But instead, cancer rates have increased during that span of time, and now

surpass heart disease as the number one killer of Americans between the ages

of 45 to 74. The odds are now very high that you or someone you know has

cancer, is dying or has already died from it.

Why has " the War on Cancer " Failed so Miserably?

Writing for the Skeptical Inquirer, Reynold Spector lists the following six

reasons for the failure:

We don't understand the cause/pathogenesis in most cases of cancer

Most treatments (except surgery are nonspecific cell killers and not " smart "

Clinical trials and the grant system don't foster innovation

Screening for useful drugs against cancer cells has not worked

Animal models of cancer are often inadequate

Unproductive " fads " in research come and go

However, while these may factor into the equation of failure, I believe this

list is yet another example of exactly what's wrong with the entire system,

which is: ignoring the fact that cancer is likely a man-made disease caused

primarily by toxic overload.

Just a few months ago, I wrote about a fascinating study into ancient

mummies that determined cancer is not a " natural " disease at all, and

genetics are not a primary factor. Tumors were extremely rare until recent

times, when pollution and poor diet became issues. So why are the medical

and science communities, by and large, ignoring these basics?

Getting to the Root of the Problem

I strongly believe the cancer rates are escalating because they are in no

way shape or form addressing the underlying cause of most cancers. Instead,

most of the research is directed towards expensive drugs that target late

stages of the disease and greatly enrich the drug companies but simply do

not prevent cancer....

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/03/30/the-war-on-can

cer-a-progress-report-for-skeptics.aspx