Re: On the basic issue on what authority to defer to for what here?

[Guest guest]

More simply put?

You could find out if the other believes in and follows through by such

action(s)/practice, for individual justice, (justice for all individuals as

being equal to the group?) and in the constitutional (of as much?) and in

individualing things for the individual and such needs of as much, simply by

asking the other if they and/or their organization (the/their church even?)

believe in " mandatory/compulsory vaccination or not. " Why don't you, of as much?

I don't believe mandatory/compulsory vaccinations are just, if you want to know,

really want to Know? (in getting to justness in that respect?) as, without your

having to ask me might be the way to lead (of such courage and faith?) in that

respect, of such thinking, if not feeling, I Am

Glavic

If the other doesn't answer you in that respect they really have answered you to

the contrary? I somewhat Feel, where you have their attention? If they don't

seem to understand you, (or care for your attention? of your interests?) of as

much (as you say and are about in that respect) assume they need help?!. and

treat accordingly?!. (of such priority? as you of yours? that that wouldn't be

how *Justness* is really served? but I Feel It Is!) I advise, of how I practice

my faith of such faith, Thereof

I would like to hear from everyone else here in that respect, leader in that

respect? .. .

And yes, I do believe chelation including A/C chelation is worth trying,

especially as compared to what else is worth trying, (of as much?) if you know

what I mean (But how could you otherwise isn't so much a question for me alone,

if not so alone.. .

The question still stands, for *you,* of as much.. .

BWT

>

> On my own thread?!. Somewhat? .. . Feel Free to Jump Right On In.. .

>

> Who's for *justice* (individual justice, that there would be any other? or

that it would be the rule of law otherwise, or even Constitutional, otherwise?)

and forced vaccinations might be the more important question to be asking about

those of authority.

>

> Where such authority doesn't jive with what you understand (for understanding

more for yourself I'd think, that you should defer to anything else? what, of

your ignorance by as much? or why be of reason or here at All?) and for justice,

if not yourself (more than anything else? of such group or priority? that there

would be a group so fair if not despicable, if not abusive?) if not such justice

(as inherent to Communication and Freedom of Speech) don't have so much to do

with them, (that they don't actually need to be treated for what they need?) and

even call them abusive (of such treatment, also prosecutes where it would be so

fair and meaningful and just) in that respect if that's how you serve justice if

not that's the only way you feel you can serve justice otherwise of the limited

choices you find yourself up against of such injustice? .. .

>

> I can hold such thoughts with my eyes closed or open.. . What's your problem?

... . Look at what you're comparing yourself if not me with? .. . That what I'm

saying isn't The thing, that matters? forgetting presentation for a moment?

should maybe make you ask yourself what the hell does presentation [if not

editing?] mean? .. .

>

> Of course, we might disagree with some of the things of the authority we

typically defer to, (of such authority?) but we should be able to disagree with

as much... where that is the basis of such authority you defer to where not of

all or nothing or something so unreasonable? If it's an all or nothing authority

(not of Understanding for your self? of such dead end) you're deferring to or

dealing with, not so much of freedom of choice of understanding more for

yourself, I would and do call such authority *abusive* (unreasonable, that abuse

isn't the opposite of reason, but I Feel It Is) in dealing with as much, in

serving justice (of my, faith and responsibility, Thereof) infer whatever you

want in that respect of what authority you're talking about if not you? of as

much? .. .

>

> Leave if you want otherwise, but I wouldn't advise it. Consider my door if not

The door open in that respect, of a/the more meaningful world? I more than

think, but Feel, as Understand, of as much, that God wouldn't be about

Understanding, but I Feel It Is, Precisely about as much

>

> That you would otherwise?!.

>

> Glavic

>

> On such authority I am and am about, but I typically call it Reason. that God

wouldn't be so reasonable if not the force of such reason in the world? (It Is

With Me?!.) Like, how could God not be perfectly clear and understandable isn't

so much a question for me if not me, so alone? of such sense/s if not such sense

I Feel, I Am.. . So, if that's not in your bible question your bible? .. . It

may not be wrong.. .

>

> I'd say the Catholic Church (of its human leadership? the way things are?) has

*issues,* just like every other authority not so much of reason does, where not

so much of this, if not of such reason, is my sense of It, Especially? .. .

Where you wanted to Know? for your self? I wish as much for you.. .

>

> P.S.

>

> Does anyone know what the Catholic Church's (or any authority's, that you

defer to) stand is on compulsory vaccinations? and Individual justice? Hello? I

don't believe anything should be beyond as much, (asking such questions, of what

rules us by as much?) and I certainly don't believe in an all-or-nothing faith

where it is for blind faith (and a blind justice?) not so much for The truth of

Understanding More for ourselves, (of Communication if not such communication?)

that anything else should matter, (to Reason? of such God?) isn't so much a

question for me alone, so alone, of such Reason if not such God.. .

>

> Best wishes, Thereof, and not so much otherwise? .. . Of (a) blind faith, I am

not.

>

[Guest guest]

Pp

Sent via BlackBerry by AT & T

[ ] Re: On the basic issue on what authority to defer to

for what here?

More simply put?

You could find out if the other believes in and follows through by such

action(s)/practice, for individual justice, (justice for all individuals as

being equal to the group?) and in the constitutional (of as much?) and in

individualing things for the individual and such needs of as much, simply by

asking the other if they and/or their organization (the/their church even?)

believe in " mandatory/compulsory vaccination or not. " Why don't you, of as much?

I don't believe mandatory/compulsory vaccinations are just, if you want to know,

really want to Know? (in getting to justness in that respect?) as, without your

having to ask me might be the way to lead (of such courage and faith?) in that

respect, of such thinking, if not feeling, I Am

Glavic

If the other doesn't answer you in that respect they really have answered you to

the contrary? I somewhat Feel, where you have their attention? If they don't

seem to understand you, (or care for your attention? of your interests?) of as

much (as you say and are about in that respect) assume they need help?!. and

treat accordingly?!. (of such priority? as you of yours? that that wouldn't be

how *Justness* is really served? but I Feel It Is!) I advise, of how I practice

my faith of such faith, Thereof

I would like to hear from everyone else here in that respect, leader in that

respect? .. .

And yes, I do believe chelation including A/C chelation is worth trying,

especially as compared to what else is worth trying, (of as much?) if you know

what I mean (But how could you otherwise isn't so much a question for me alone,

if not so alone.. .

The question still stands, for *you,* of as much.. .

BWT

>

> On my own thread?!. Somewhat? .. . Feel Free to Jump Right On In.. .

>

> Who's for *justice* (individual justice, that there would be any other? or

that it would be the rule of law otherwise, or even Constitutional, otherwise?)

and forced vaccinations might be the more important question to be asking about

those of authority.

>

> Where such authority doesn't jive with what you understand (for understanding

more for yourself I'd think, that you should defer to anything else? what, of

your ignorance by as much? or why be of reason or here at All?) and for justice,

if not yourself (more than anything else? of such group or priority? that there

would be a group so fair if not despicable, if not abusive?) if not such justice

(as inherent to Communication and Freedom of Speech) don't have so much to do

with them, (that they don't actually need to be treated for what they need?) and

even call them abusive (of such treatment, also prosecutes where it would be so

fair and meaningful and just) in that respect if that's how you serve justice if

not that's the only way you feel you can serve justice otherwise of the limited

choices you find yourself up against of such injustice? .. .

>

> I can hold such thoughts with my eyes closed or open.. . What's your problem?

... . Look at what you're comparing yourself if not me with? .. . That what I'm

saying isn't The thing, that matters? forgetting presentation for a moment?

should maybe make you ask yourself what the hell does presentation [if not

editing?] mean? .. .

>

> Of course, we might disagree with some of the things of the authority we

typically defer to, (of such authority?) but we should be able to disagree with

as much... where that is the basis of such authority you defer to where not of

all or nothing or something so unreasonable? If it's an all or nothing authority

(not of Understanding for your self? of such dead end) you're deferring to or

dealing with, not so much of freedom of choice of understanding more for

yourself, I would and do call such authority *abusive* (unreasonable, that abuse

isn't the opposite of reason, but I Feel It Is) in dealing with as much, in

serving justice (of my, faith and responsibility, Thereof) infer whatever you

want in that respect of what authority you're talking about if not you? of as

much? .. .

>

> Leave if you want otherwise, but I wouldn't advise it. Consider my door if not

The door open in that respect, of a/the more meaningful world? I more than

think, but Feel, as Understand, of as much, that God wouldn't be about

Understanding, but I Feel It Is, Precisely about as much

>

> That you would otherwise?!.

>

> Glavic

>

> On such authority I am and am about, but I typically call it Reason. that God

wouldn't be so reasonable if not the force of such reason in the world? (It Is

With Me?!.) Like, how could God not be perfectly clear and understandable isn't

so much a question for me if not me, so alone? of such sense/s if not such sense

I Feel, I Am.. . So, if that's not in your bible question your bible? .. . It

may not be wrong.. .

>

> I'd say the Catholic Church (of its human leadership? the way things are?) has

*issues,* just like every other authority not so much of reason does, where not

so much of this, if not of such reason, is my sense of It, Especially? .. .

Where you wanted to Know? for your self? I wish as much for you.. .

>

> P.S.

>

> Does anyone know what the Catholic Church's (or any authority's, that you

defer to) stand is on compulsory vaccinations? and Individual justice? Hello? I

don't believe anything should be beyond as much, (asking such questions, of what

rules us by as much?) and I certainly don't believe in an all-or-nothing faith

where it is for blind faith (and a blind justice?) not so much for The truth of

Understanding More for ourselves, (of Communication if not such communication?)

that anything else should matter, (to Reason? of such God?) isn't so much a

question for me alone, so alone, of such Reason if not such God.. .

>

> Best wishes, Thereof, and not so much otherwise? .. . Of (a) blind faith, I am

not.

>