9 Questions That Stump Every Pro-Vaccine Advocate and Their Claims

[Guest guest]

9 Questions That Stump Every Pro-Vaccine Advocate and Their Claims

<http://preventdisea se.com/news/ 09/102809_ 9_arguments_ to_win_any_

vaccine_debate. shtml>

Since the flu pandemic was declared, there have been several

so-called " vaccine experts " coming out of the woodwork attempting to

justify the effectiveness of vaccines. All of them parrot the same

ridiculous historical and pseudoscientific perspectives of

vaccinations which are easily squelched with the following 9 questions.

Claim: The study of vaccines, their historical record of

achievements, effectiveness, safety and mechanism in humans are well

understood and proven in scientific and medical circles.

Fact: The claim is completely false.

1. What to ask: Could you please provide one double-blind,

placebo-controlled study that can prove the safety and effectiveness

of vaccines?

2. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific evidence on ANY

study which can confirm the long-term safety and effectiveness of vaccines?

3. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific evidence which

can prove that disease reduction in any part of the world, at any

point in history was attributable to inoculation of populations?

4. What to ask: Could you please explain how the safety and mechanism

of vaccines in the human body are scientifically proven if their

pharmacokinetics (the study of bodily absorption, distribution,

metabolism and excretion of ingredients) are never examined

or analyzed in any vaccine study?

One of the most critical elements which defines the toxicity

potential of any vaccine are its pharmacokinetic properties. Drug

companies and health agencies refuse to consider the study, analysis

or evaluation of the pharmacokinetic properties of any vaccine.

There is not one double-blind, placebo-controlled study in the

history of vaccine development that has ever proven their safety,

effectiveness or achievements (unless those achievements have

underlined their damage to human health).

There are also no controlled studies completed in any country which

have objectively proven that vaccines have had any direct or

consequential effect on the reduction of any type of disease in any

part of the world.

Every single study that has ever attempted to validate the safety and

effectiveness of vaccines has conclusively established carcinogenic,

mutagenic, neurotoxic or fertility impairments, but they won't address those.

************ ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* *********

********* ***

Claim: Preservatives and chemical additives used in the manufacture

of vaccines are safe and no studies have been linked or proven them

unsafe for use in humans.

Fact: The claim is completely false.

5. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification as

to how injecting a human being with a confirmed neurotoxin is

beneficial to human health and prevents disease?

6. What to ask: Can you provide a risk/benefit profile on how the

benefits of injecting a known neurotoxin exceeds its risks to human

health for the intended goal of preventing disease?

This issue is no longer even open to debate. It is a scientifically

established fact in literally hundreds of studies that the

preservatives and chemical additives in vaccines damage cells.

Neurotoxicity, immune suppression, immune-mediated chronic

inflammation and carcinogenic proliferation are just a few of several

effects that have been observed on the human body.

< http://preventdisea se.com/news/ 09/100509_ vaccine_chemical s_inserts. shtml

>See

a list of chemicals in vaccines

Fortunately, the drug companies still tell us the damage vaccines

have on the human body. People just don't read them. All you have to

do is look at the insert for any vaccine, and it will detail the

exact

< http://preventdisea se.com/news/ 09/092109_ H1N1_package_ inserts_warnings

..shtml >ingredients,

alerts and potentially lethal effects.

See my latest

< http://preventdisea se.com/news/ 09/102609_ Alert_Canadians_ Arepanrix_

vaccine_analysis .shtml >analysis

of the Arepanrix H1N1 vaccine for an example.

Any medical professional who believes that it is justified to inject

any type of neurotoxin into any person to prevent any disease is

completely misguided, misinformed, deluded and ignorant of any logic

regarding human health.

************ ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* *********

********* ***

Claim: Once an individual is injected with the foreign antigen in

the vaccine, that individual becomes immune to future infections.

Fact: The claim is completely false.

7. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification on

how bypassing the respiratory tract (or mucous membrane) is

advantageous and how directly injecting viruses into the bloodstream

enhances immune functioning and prevents future infections?

8. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification on

how a vaccine would prevent viruses from mutating?

9. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification as

to how a vaccination can target a virus in an infected individual who

does not have the exact viral configuration or strain the vaccine was

developed for?

All promoters of vaccination fail to realize that the respiratory

tract of humans (actually all mammals) contains antibodies which

initiates natural immune responses within the respiratory tract

mucosa. Bypassing this mucosal aspect of the immune system by

directly injecting viruses into the bloodstream leads to a corruption

in the immune system itself. As a result, the pathogenic viruses or

bacteria cannot be eliminated by the immune system and remain in the

body, where they will further grow and/or mutate as the individual is

exposed to ever more antigens and toxins in the environment which

continue to assault the immune system.

Despite the injection of any type of vaccine, viruses continue

circulating through the body, mutating and transforming into other

organisms. The ability of a vaccine manufacturer to target the exact

viral strain without knowing its mutagenic properties is equivalent

to shooting a gun at a fixed target that has already been moved from

its location. You would be shooting at what was, not what is!

Flu viruses, may mutate, change or adapt several times over a period

of one flu season, making the seasonal influenza vaccine 100%

redundant and ineffective every single flu season. Ironically, the

natural immune defenses of the human body can target these changes

but the vaccines cannot.

I have never encountered one pro-vaccine advocate, whether medically

or scientifically qualified, who could answer even 1 let alone all 9

of these questions. One or all of the following will happen when

debating any of the above questions:

- They will concede defeat and admit they are stumped

- They will attempt to discredit unrelated issues that do not pertain

to the question.

- They will formulate their response and rebuttal based on historical

arguments and scientific studies which have been disproved over and over again.

Not one pro-vaccine advocate will ever directly address these

questions in an open mainstream venue.

Dave Mihalovic is a Naturopathic Doctor who specializes in vaccine

research, cancer prevention and a natural approach to treatment.