Documents vindicate Wakefield, implicate Deer

[Guest guest]

(NaturalNews) New documents have emerged that clear Dr Wakefield of the

allegations of fraud recently made by the British Medical Journal and its

reporter Deer. This new evidence " completely negates the allegations that

I committed scientific fraud. Deer and Dr. Godlee of the British Medical

Journal (BMJ) knew or should have known about the facts set out below before

publishing their false allegations, " says Dr Wakefield (see sources,

below).

Newly-revealed documents show that on December 20th, 1996, a meeting of The

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Study Group based at the Royal Free Hospital Medical

School featured a presentation by Professor - on seven of the

children who would later become part of the group of patients Dr Wakefield wrote

about in his 1998 The Lancet paper (which was later retracted by The Lancet).

Remember, Dr Wakefield has been accused of completely fabricating his findings

about these same children in his 1998 paper, but these documents reveal that

fourteen months before Dr Wakefield's paper was published, two other researchers

-- Professor - and Dr Amar Dhillon -- independently documented the

same problems in these children, including symptoms of autism.

Thus, Dr Wakefield could not have " fabricated " these findings as alleged by the

British Medical Journal, which now finds itself in the position of needing to

issue a retraction, or it must now expand its accusations of fraud to include

Professor - and Dr Dhillon... essentially, the BMJ must now insist

that a " conspiracy of fraud " existed among at least these three researchers, and

possibly more, in order to back up its allegation that Dr Wakefield's study

results were fabricated.

The smoking-gun evidence

Professor -'s 1996 presentation at the Royal Free Hospital Medical

School was entitled, " Entero-colitis and Disintegrative Disorder Following MMR -

A Review of the First Seven Cases. "

His presentation notes began with the following text: " " I wish today, to present

some preliminary details concerning seven children, all boys, who appear to have

entero-colitis and disintegrative disorder, probably autism, following MMR. I

shall now briefly present

their case history [sic]. "

He then went on to detail the clinical history of these seven children as

derived from his medical team as well as senior pathologist Dr Amar Dhillon.

Importantly, Dr Wakefield was not part of this investigation. This means

that Dr Wakefield's findings were independently replicated by another medical

research team.

The British Medical Journal's accusations against Dr Wakefield -- that he

fabricated his findings -- are therefore false. The mainstream media accusation

that Dr Wakefield's findings have " never been replicated " is also blatantly

false.

Here are the notes on the seven children, as presented in 1996, 14 months BEFORE

Dr Wakefield published his landmark paper in The Lancet:

Child 1. Immediate reaction to MMR with fever at 1 [corrected, illegible]

Rapid deterioration in behaviour - autism

Histology active chronic inflammation in caecum

Treated Asacol

INDETERMINATE COLITIS** (1)

Child 2. MMR at 15 months - head banging 2 weeks later.

Hyperactive from 18 months.

Endoscopy - aphthoid ulcer at hepatic flexure

Caecum: lymphoid nodular hyperplasia with erythematous rim and pale swollen

core.

Histology, Ileum mild inflammation, colon moderate inflammation

Acute and chronic inflammation.

Treated CT3211 [a dietary treatment]

INDETERMINATE COLITIS** ? CROHN'S DISEASE

Child 3. ? dysmorphism - chromosomes and normal development

MMR at 5 months [sic]

Measles at 2.5 years* - 1 month later change in behavior

Hyperactive with food

Colonoscopy - granular rectum, normal colon and lymphoid nodular

hyperplasia.

Histopathology: lymphoid nodular hyperplasia.

Increased eosinophils 5/5 mild increase in inflammatory cells (Dhillon)

Routine normal

LYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIA

INDETERMINATE COLITIS**

[* correction: he received measles vaccine first at approximately 15 months of

age and MMR at 2.5. years]

Child 4 (2). Reacted to triple vaccine 4 months - screaming and near cot death

(DPT)

MMR at 15 months - behaviour changed after 1 week.

" measles rash " week before

Endoscopy - minor abnormalities of vascular pattern

Histology - non-specific proctocolitis**

Treated

INDETERMINTE PROCTOCOLITIS

LYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIA

Child 5 (3). MMR at 14 months.

Second day after, fever and rash, bangs head and behaviour abnormal

thereafter.

Endoscopy - Lymphoid nodular hyperplasia

Histopathology: Marked increase in IEL's [intraepithelial lymphocytes] in ileum

with chronic inflammatory cells in reactive follicles. Increase in inflammatory

cells in colon and IELs increased.

LYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIA

INDETERMINATE COLITIS

Child 6 (7). MMR - 16 months - no obvious reaction

2 years behavioral change - 2.5 years

Screaming attacks - / food related

Endoscopy - Lymphoid nodular hyperplasia terminal ileum

Histology - Prominent lymphoid follicles

Dhillon: moderate to marked increase in IEL's, increase in chronic inflammatory

cells throughout the colon - superficial macrophages not quite granuloma

INDTERMINATE COLITIS

Child 78. MMR 14 months

16 months " growling voice "

18 months - behavioural changes - autism diagnosed at 3 years

Barium [follow through X ray] 5 cm tight stricture [proximal] to insertion of

terminal ileum

Endoscopy- prominent lymphoid follicle in ileum

Mild proctitis with granular mucosa

Histology

Ileum - reactive follicles

Colon - bifid forms, increased IEL's

Slight increase in inflammatory cells

INDETERMINATE COLITIS

? CROHN'S DISEASE

NOTES:

(1) Inflammation that is not diagnostic of either Crohn's disease or ulcerative

colitis

(2) Child 6 in The Lancet paper. The chronological order was corrected for the

final Lancet paper.

(3) Child 3 in The Lancet paper

BMJ caught in its own fraud

These documents reveal that the British Medical Journal has been caught in its

own fraud for willfully ignoring this evidence, which was presented to it long

before its recent publication of Deer's article calling Dr Wakefield a

fraud.

The BMJ willfully ignored this evidence and simply decided to destroy Dr

Wakefield's professional reputation by any means necessary. As Dr Wakefield

explains:

" In allowing itself to become the vehicle for Deer's particular brand of

journalism; in circumventing the process of due diligence in its enthusiasm to

" kill the beast " , the BMJ has taken a huge risk. As the document presented above

shows, this was a mistake. Medicine, presented with the possibility of an

iatrogenic catastrophe, has boarded a dissonant bandwagon and has gone after

those who have concerns - genuine concerns - that childhood vaccines may be

responsible, at least in part, for the autism epidemic. The relevant science has

been grossly misrepresented, crushed beneath the wheels of a Public Relations

16-wheeler that is out of control. In the meantime a relentless tsunami of

damaged children claims this land. "

Deer caught as a liar

It has also been revealed that journalist Deer, the author of the BMJ

article condemning Dr Wakefield as a fraud, is himself a liar. In attempting to

gather evidence for his article in the BMJ, he lied about his identity and

entered the home of one of the parents of the autism children. Specifically, he

claimed he was working for The Sunday Times even though he was never a Sunday

Times employee.

This is just the tip of the iceberg of the outright deception that has been used

by the BMJ and Deer in their attempt to silence a doctor whose only

" crime " was publicly expressing concern about the safety of MMR vaccines.

That the BMJ and its writer Deer have now been caught ignoring evidence

and engaging in their own fraud gives credence to the idea that MMR vaccines

may, indeed, not only be dangerous; but that they may be so dangerous that the

top medical journals have to lie about the facts in order to protect them.

What's clear here is that the BMJ has strayed so far from the realm of

evidence-based scientific thinking that it can no longer be called a reputable

medical journal at all. Its callous disregard for the truth -- and its

politically-motivated witch hunt against a researcher who only sought to protect

the health of children -- exposes it as a danger to the scientific community and

the world of conventional medicine.

As this truth unfolds, these revelations will rock the medical world and expose

these science journals as the frauds they truly are. Think about this: While

these medical journals are taking money from vaccine manufacturers (who pay

their ads), they are ignoring any scientific evidence they don't like in order

to vilify anyone who threatens the profits of these very same vaccine companies!

And yet, these medical journals never admit that their very existence depends on

the financial flow of money from these vaccine manufacturers who are strongly

impacted by their editorial decisions!

There is fraud taking place in the vaccine industry today, of course, and the

medical journals are the point men who push their distorted disinformation into

the minds of doctors, journalists and anyone they can reach with their

scientific distortions. At stake is the future of the vaccine industry, which is

of course a multi-billion-dollar industry that thrives on misinformation and the

ongoing scientific censorship of the facts surrounding the health risks posed by

vaccines.

Read the book Callous Disregard

Dr Wakefield is the author of Callous Disregard, the book that exposes

the truth behind conventional medicine's political witch hunt. The book is sold

everywhere, including Amazon.com: http://www.amazon.com/Callous-Disre...

Sources for this story include:

http://www.vaccinesafetyfirst.com/p...

Learn more:

http://www.naturalnews.com/031116_Dr__Wakefield_British_Medical_Journal.ht\

ml#ixzz1CApumA00