Tyranny Alert! No Parental Consent Vaccination Laws Proposed in NY

[Guest guest]

" A HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONER MAY PROVIDE HEALTH CARE RELATED TO THE PREVENTION OF

A SEXUALLY TRANSMISSIBLE DISEASE, INCLUDING ADMINISTERING VACCINES, TO A PERSON

UNDER THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN YEARS WITHOUT THE CONSENT OR KNOWLEDGE OF THE PARENTS

OR GUARDIANS OF SUCH PERSON, PROVIDED THAT THE PERSON HAS CAPACITY TO CONSENT TO

THE CARE, WITHOUT REGARD TO THE PERSON'S AGE, AND THE PERSON CONSENTS. "

The above comes from Bills A00343 and S00384, which amends Section 2305 of New

York's public health laws regarding care and treatment for

sexually-transmissible diseases. This amendment authorizes children (minors) to

be medicated and vaccinated for sexually-transmissible infections (STIs) in

settings outside of hospitals and clinics, such as playgrounds, school

cafeterias, etc.; and without the consent or knowledge of their parents.

Egregiously omitted is " who or whom " will be responsible for injuries, including

deaths, incurred by these children as a result of vaccinations. Ultimately,

parents will be although they were denied the natural right to consent....To

read entire article, visit http://www.kamuhammad.net.

[Guest guest]

What in the world does " has capacity to consent " mean?! That any child who can

say 'yes' to a coercive doctor is fair game?? I thought being a minor meant,

rather by definition, that one does not have such capacity. What about parents

with religious objections? Vaccinating a child in that situation could

constitute a violation of their Constitutional rights--and federal law being the

higher authority, it would trump the state law. This looks like very bad

legislation, NY folks need to object to this loudly and persistently until it is

fixed.

Alan , JD

vaccinerights.com

>

> " A HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONER MAY PROVIDE HEALTH CARE RELATED TO THE PREVENTION

OF A SEXUALLY TRANSMISSIBLE DISEASE, INCLUDING ADMINISTERING VACCINES, TO A

PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN YEARS WITHOUT THE CONSENT OR KNOWLEDGE OF THE

PARENTS OR GUARDIANS OF SUCH PERSON, PROVIDED THAT THE PERSON HAS CAPACITY TO

CONSENT TO THE CARE, WITHOUT REGARD TO THE PERSON'S AGE, AND THE PERSON

CONSENTS. "

>

[Guest guest]

AMEN and AMEN!!!!!!

~~Ruth

From: no-forced-vaccination [mailto:no-forced-vaccination ] On Behalf Of lawpapa23

Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011

9:59 AM

no-forced-vaccination

Subject:

Re: Tyranny Alert! " No Parental Consent " Vaccination Laws Proposed in

NY

What in the world does " has capacity to consent " mean?! That

any child who can say 'yes' to a coercive doctor is fair game?? I thought being

a minor meant, rather by definition, that one does not have such capacity. What

about parents with religious objections? Vaccinating a child in that situation

could constitute a violation of their Constitutional rights--and federal law

being the higher authority, it would trump the state law. This looks like very

bad legislation, NY folks need to object to this loudly and persistently until

it is fixed.

Alan , JD

vaccinerights.com

>

> " A HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONER MAY PROVIDE HEALTH CARE RELATED TO THE

PREVENTION OF A SEXUALLY TRANSMISSIBLE DISEASE, INCLUDING ADMINISTERING

VACCINES, TO A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN YEARS WITHOUT THE CONSENT OR

KNOWLEDGE OF THE PARENTS OR GUARDIANS OF SUCH PERSON, PROVIDED THAT THE PERSON

HAS CAPACITY TO CONSENT TO THE CARE, WITHOUT REGARD TO THE PERSON'S AGE, AND

THE PERSON CONSENTS. "

>