Guest guest Posted August 29, 2001 Report Share Posted August 29, 2001 Last week, the OPMC moved ahead in its action against Dr. Orens. As you may remember, the decision to revolke his license had been overturned by the Supreme Court of NY Appellate division. Last week the Department of Health filed a motion to appeal that action by the Supreme Court and to try to again take Dr. Orens' license. I have updated teh Summary below to reflect this. If you send the Summary on , please use this latest version. Thanks, Ellen PLEASE DISTRIBUTE; THE ISSUE Lyme disease patients are currently protesting the actions of the New York State Office of Professional Medical Conduct (OPMC), the medical licensing arm of the Department of Health, against doctors in NYS who are willing to offer ongoing treatment to chronic Lyme disease patients (Lyme Literate Medical Doctors or LLMD's). OPMC harassment of LLMD's over a period of years has left NYS, the state with the largest number of Lyme disease cases in the country, with only eleven doctors who are willing to treat chronic Lyme disease. Out of these eleven LLMDs , the OPMC is currently involved in various stages of investigation of at least FIVE for alleged medical misconduct. In addition, the OPMC investigations of NYS LLMD's coincided with charges against LLMD's by the medical licensing boards in several other states. These investigations could lead to loss of medical licenses or restrictions on the doctors' right to treat Lyme disease. The chilling effect on the medical community caused by the obvious targeting of Lyme disease physicians has made it increasingly difficult or impossible for Lyme patients to find adequate medical care. In the instance of the NYS cases, Lyme disease patients feel that these hearings are inherently unjust, since the OPMC has repeatedly stated in letters to us that the guidelines it uses to judge Lyme disease physicians " rarely if ever " indicate that more than 2-3 weeks of antibiotic treatment is needed to cure Lyme disease. This is clear evidence of bias, since the OPMC is ignoring the considerable scientific evidence that Lyme disease can persist beyond such limited treatment. CURRENT STATUS OF KNOWN OPMC ACTIONS AGAINST LLMDs: As of 8/29/01, Dr. ph Burrascano, the best known of our LLLMD's and the author of guidelines that have been followed by many physicians who treat chronic Lyme disease, has been charged with medical misconduct and has been in hearings before the OPMC since October of last year. His hearing will continue into September. Dr. Orens, whose license was revoked in 11/99 as a result of his hearings before the OPMC, has had his license reinstated by the Appellate court of the Supreme Court of New York State. The Appellate court overturned the OPMC's decision based on the fact that the judging panel at the OPMC hearing was supposed to have consisted of two physicians and a lay person but that the supposed lay person was actually a Physician's Assistant. The OPMC now has the right to appeal this decision and/ or retry him. They have gone ahead and filed a motion to appeal the decision. Three other LLMDs who do not now wish to become public are under investigation by the OPMC. THE BASIC SCIENTIFIC CONTROVERSY: There has been a long-standing controversy in the medical community as to whether or not Lyme disease is easily diagnosed, treated and cured. One group states that diagnosis is easy and that Lyme is almost always cured with 4 weeks of antibiotics. If the patient is still sick after those 4 weeks, this group claims that either the patient was incorrectly diagnosed, that the continuing symptoms are psychosomatic, or that the patient now suffers from an autoimmune problem which was caused by the original Lyme infection --- and that there is no treatment for this auto-immune problem. The other side of the controversy is supported by chronic Lyme patients and the physicians who treat us. We contend that the persistence of Lyme disease symptoms beyond the 4 week treatment is due to the persistence of the Lyme disease bacterial infection and/or to the presence of co-infection. We attest to the fact that we do much better when treated beyond those 4 weeks of antibiotic treatment. Our subjective experience is supported by a body of peer reviewed scientific research. Since there is no definitive test to show when someone has Lyme disease and/or is cured of it, since our symptoms persist past the standard four week treatment, and since we have significant scientific literature supporting that the Lyme bacterium can survive this standard treatment, we protest any attempt by the OPMC to repress the right of physicians to treat chronic Lyme disease patients according to their best clinical judgment which has been informed by the scientific literature. HOW THE OPMC WORKS: OPMC investigations are begun when a complaint is made against a doctor. The identity of the complainant is kept confidential. Anyone is permitted to make a complaint, but complaints are generally made by either a patient, a physician OR an insurance company. In addition, OPMC may instigate a complaint on its own. If OPMC investigates the original claim and determines it has some validity, it then has the right to go into all of the physician's records, not just the record pertaining to the complainant. Investigations can and do go on for a number of years, involving a fine tooth combing of the physician's records. The ultimate charges that bring a physician before an OPMC hearing committee are lodged by OPMC. The charges may have nothing to do with the original complaint that was made, but rather may arise from the OPMC's lengthy investigation of all the doctor's medical records. HISTORY OF ACTIVISM AGAINST OPMC HARASSMENT OF LLMD's: The political work recounted below has been the combined effort of Lyme disease patients, Pat of the Lyme Disease Association (LDA), of the Foundation for the Advancement of Innovative Medicine (FAIM), and NYS Assembly members Nettie Mayersohn and . The strength and courage that was shown by hundreds or thousands of extremely ill Lyme disease patients in fighting against OPMC oppression seems nothing short of miraculous and something we can all be very proud of. 1)INITIAL PROTEST: In December 1999, alarmed that New York LLMD's were being investigated by the OPMC and outraged by the revocation of Dr. Orens' license, a group of Lyme disease patients organized the opening move in our activism. More than 100 people staged a protest was in front of OPMC headquarters in NYC. 2) DR. MARKS LETTER REVEALS OPMC BIAS: On 12-21-99, Dr. Ansel Marks, executive secretary of the OPMC wrote in a letter to one of the Lyme patients that " the Centers for Disease Control, American Lyme Disease Foundation, Medical Letter, and a host of other sources have provided guidance for the standard care of Lyme disease. Rarely, if ever, have these published guidelines indicated that anything more than two-three weeks of antibiotics are required to cure Lyme disease. " This unexpected admission of bias by the OPMC, which was to be judge and jury in the investigations and hearings of our LLMDs, was shocking to the Lyme community. This message was repeated in several letters by the OPMC over a period of time. 3) LETTER WRITING CAMPAIGN/ LOBBYING OF NYS OFFICIALS: The Lyme community (including LymePac a coalition of New York State support group leaders, other NYS activists, and with FAIM) organized national letter writing campaigns to key New York State politicians protesting the obvious bias of the OPMC. followed up with lobbying visits to these politicians, some of whom contacted the OPMC on our behalf. The thousands of letters received by Assemblyman had the impact we wanted. Jill Auerbach, a Lyme activist from upstate New York, had been in constant contact with Assemblyman about the critical issues facing Lyme disease patients. The letters gave a sense of the extent of the epidemic and helped motivate him to take an additional step in becoming an impassioned advocate for our cause. Nettie Mayersohn, an Assemblywoman in Queens, New York , was also moved by the letters she received from the Lyme community. After carefully investigating the situation, she became convinced that the OPMC's actions against the LLMD's constituted a serious injustice. She and ultimately teamed up to work on our behalf behind the scenes with the NYS government. 4) WHAT WE HAVE BEEN ASKING THE LEGISLATURE TO DO: Because the NYS constitution does not permit the legislature to intervene directly in OPMC investigations or hearings against doctors, our request has been that the legislature hold public hearings into the bias of the OPMC against Lyme disease physicians. We have been asking for a moratorium on OPMC actions against LLMD's until after these public legislative hearings could insure that the OPMC would be unbiased in their dealings with them. (Technically, only the Governor can call for such a moratorium, so that this latter point is actually a request that the legislators petition the Governor for a moratorium). The OPMC responded to legislators who approached them on our behalf by claiming that they were not biased against LLMDs. 5) THE OPMC PRESENTS DR. BURRASCANO WITH OFFICIAL CHARGES OF MEDICAL MISCONDUCT- Summer of 2000: The OPMC used the opportunity of the legislature's recess to move to the next step in the process against Dr. B, They presented him with official charges of medical misconduct and scheduled his hearing for October 26th, 2000. The Lyme community quickly responded to the hearing date against Dr. B by planning a rally in NYC at the Plaza Hotel (see below), and renewing the letter writing campaigns, visits to legislators and contact with the media. On September 15th, Assemblyuman arranged a meeting with representatives of Antonia Novello, the New York State Commissioner of Health, together with some patients and physicians, to discuss issues of Lyme and other Tick-borne disease problems facing the NYS health care system. The rally, held on November 9th in New York City, drew many hundreds of Lyme disease patients from across the country. Two LLMD's spoke out against OPMC repression of LLMD's and letters, official statements and a petition all signed by physicians were read to the crowd. Both Pat of the LDA and Tom Forschner of the LDF also spoke out. The rally and much of the activism in New York State has been organized by an ad hoc grassroots group adopting the name Voices of Lyme, which had been used in previous Lyme disease activism across the country. This group was greatly assisted by Pat of the LDA and of FAIM. Inside the Plaza Hotel immediately before the rally FAIM held a press conference wherein 5 of those patients whose patient charts had been used to charge Dr.Burrascano made themselves publicly known and spoke in his defense. 6) INCREASE IN LOBBYING EFFORTS: Assemblymembers and Mayersohn held another meeting with the representatives of Dr. Novello and Lyme activists on March 26th. In an effort to muster more support in the legislature, FAIM and Voices of Lyme, with support from Pat , organized Lobby Day for March 27th. More than 200 New York State residents and patients of New York State LLMD's went to Albany to lobby legislators to hold public hearings into OPMC harassment of our physicians. We were accompanied by Lyme disease representatives from across the country in a silent vigil reminding the NYS legislators that the whole country is watching what happens in NYS! In the months following Lobby Day, New Yorkers have lobbied NINETY State legislators, most of whom have been sympathetic and have stated their willingness to join with Assemblymembers Mayersohn and in getting legislative hearings. 7) BEHIND THE SCENES NEGOTIATIONS: On April 25th, Mayersohn and and other legislators supporting us, and Lyme activists headed by Pat , met with representatives of the Governor's office to halt the actions of the OPMC. Since then, there have been other meetings and considerable behind the scenes negotiations in attempts to insure justice for our doctors. 8) GRASSROOTS CALL ON GOVERNOR TO INTERVENE IN OPMC ACTIONS: On June 13th and 14th, 2001 , patients across the country conducted a two day call-in and write in campaign to Governor Pataki, asking him to intercede and halt the actions of the OPMC against Lyme disease physicians. Governor Pataki has not responded publicly and further attempts to reach him will be organized in the future. CURRENT PLANS FOR ACTIVISM: We are now resuming our lobbying of all New York State legislators which had been temporarily halted as the legislature was finishing up the current spring session and going on summer vacation. We continue to press for legislative hearings into OPMC bias. HOW YOU CAN HELP END OPMC HARASSMENT OF LLMD'S; We are asking all New York State residents to help us in this fight by signing up with Voices of Lyme by e-mailing Cheryl at nylyme@... to assist in letter writing and lobbying. Those without e-mail can call Eva at 631-878-6657. We will then contact you with more information. This list is not only for Lyme disease patients, but rather for anyone who is willing to work with us. We are also asking for Lyme patients, particularly those in the Northeast, to print out and distribute the flyer we have written to inform New York State Lyme patients of the OPMC issue and ask them to sign up with us. This is extremely important!!! http:/www.aero-vision.com/~cheryl/flyer.html To see how the Lyme Controversy fits in the larger context of NYS medical politics go to http://www.faim.org/news.htm We would also like to ask Lyme disease activists in each state to organize those people who will be willing to take a stand on the OPMC harassment issue!! Although much of the work at present has to be limited to New York State Lyme disease patients, we do not know what the future will hold. Being able to mobilize hundreds or thousands of people at a moment's notice for protests, letter writing campaigns, etc., could mean a great deal in stopping persecution of our doctors and insuring medical care for every Lyme disease patient. Thank you, Voices of Lyme Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.