Guest guest Posted March 24, 2011 Report Share Posted March 24, 2011 The radiac I tryed 2 times I found it so powerfull tha ti had to wait for a smaller load of bacterias to use it again . I had a delayed severe herx from it .. Marie ________________________________ From: Deb57 <ds@...> Sent: Thu, March 24, 2011 12:36:27 PM Subject: [ ] Re: Bart? & Rife  I just finished reading Rosner's book on Lyme and Rife. It was written in 2004 and so is somewhat outdated. However, some of his theory about the layers of the disease make sense. Untreated, symptoms " disappear " and new ones emerge - this is not because the bugs are gone from those areas but that they have settled in. Thus, many using rife or salt/c treatment describe how the symptoms appear in reverse order (and sometimes new ones emerge) as treatment hits spirochetes and emerging cysts, knocking back the load. This concept is suggested with other chronic illnesses as well. I have not used a rife machine that requires the programming of a specific frequency. The machines I have used sweep through a range of frequencies. I believe this has caused some improvement but now I have plateaued. Thus I am exploring whether a stronger machine such as a coil might be of value. This is a lengthy and laborious process of choosing one frequency at a time, requiring a great deal of patience. Some people will treat with one frequency followed by another either that same day or perhaps a different day or maybe wait until one pathogen appears knocked back (judging by a reduction or elimination of herx/die-off symptoms) before moving on to the next. Someone recently sent me this info: lyme 432 bart 832 myco 690 babesia 570 anaplasma 387 erlichia 395 epstein barr virus 880 xmrv 448 They wrote (sorry if I already posted this): " they do live in the hierarchy order I wrote above. When lyme/bart is reduced if you have myco, you'll start getting new myco symptoms as it emerges. Once myco is reduced, you'll get babesia symptoms, so with each emergence it takes some time to get that bug beaten back. " deb > > One of the problems with Lyme (Borrelia) is that symptoms can vary strongly >anyway. So one could easily get the impression that 'something has changed' >after days or weeks, giving the impression that maybe one bug is gone and the >next one is presenting itself? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2011 Report Share Posted April 2, 2011 I've been trying to decide btw a rife machine and a doug coil. From: Deb57 <ds@...> Subject: [ ] Re: Bart? & Rife Date: Thursday, March 24, 2011, 12:36 PM Â I just finished reading Rosner's book on Lyme and Rife. It was written in 2004 and so is somewhat outdated. However, some of his theory about the layers of the disease make sense. Untreated, symptoms " disappear " and new ones emerge - this is not because the bugs are gone from those areas but that they have settled in. Thus, many using rife or salt/c treatment describe how the symptoms appear in reverse order (and sometimes new ones emerge) as treatment hits spirochetes and emerging cysts, knocking back the load. This concept is suggested with other chronic illnesses as well. I have not used a rife machine that requires the programming of a specific frequency. The machines I have used sweep through a range of frequencies. I believe this has caused some improvement but now I have plateaued. Thus I am exploring whether a stronger machine such as a coil might be of value. This is a lengthy and laborious process of choosing one frequency at a time, requiring a great deal of patience. Some people will treat with one frequency followed by another either that same day or perhaps a different day or maybe wait until one pathogen appears knocked back (judging by a reduction or elimination of herx/die-off symptoms) before moving on to the next. Someone recently sent me this info: lyme 432 bart 832 myco 690 babesia 570 anaplasma 387 erlichia 395 epstein barr virus 880 xmrv 448 They wrote (sorry if I already posted this): " they do live in the hierarchy order I wrote above. When lyme/bart is reduced if you have myco, you'll start getting new myco symptoms as it emerges. Once myco is reduced, you'll get babesia symptoms, so with each emergence it takes some time to get that bug beaten back. " deb > > One of the problems with Lyme (Borrelia) is that symptoms can vary strongly anyway. So one could easily get the impression that 'something has changed' after days or weeks, giving the impression that maybe one bug is gone and the next one is presenting itself? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.