Guest guest Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 Dr Mather has patented a method for culturing pathogens including Borrelia (Lyme) from tick SALIVA http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6312915-claims.html Dr Mather also wrote a chapter in a book on pathogen transmission http://books.google.com/books?hl=en & lr= & id=ykHNidUomr4C & oi=fnd & pg=PA68 & dq=thomas\ +mather+pathogen+in+tick+saliva & ots=D4xkTkCN74 & sig=2TlJ7EYu3nGa5nx1Lb2cTRGWXsw#P\ PA76,M1 page 76: " Pathogens may be transmitted from ticks to animal hosts via saliva ( Borrelia,piroplasms,viruses) , regurgitation (rickettsiae), coxal fluid (borreliae), and feces ( riskettsiae).Ixodid ticks lack coxal glands and therefore cannot transmit via coxal fluids, " [piroplasms are things like babesia] I mention him as I have an excerpt from a personal communique from him to a Dr that states: QUOTE N. Mather, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Vector-Borne Disease University of Rhode Island Dr. ____, Most certainly the saliva of an infected tick contains one or more of the pathogens that this tick is capable of transmitting. We have a paper in which we demonstrated that we could even culture Lyme bacteria from the saliva we collected from infected adult ticks. then there are these studies: http://jcm.highwire.org/cgi/content/abstract/39/11/4145 assays of spirochetes in gut and salivary glands before and after feeding of nymphal ticks: results show that in glands, Before feeding there were an average of 1.2 spirochetes that increased to 20.8 at 72 hrs post attachment. while they DO increase, there are STILL some present at the very beginning of a feed!!! http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/318818 this one tested transmission times of Borrelia and Ehrlichia--with infected nymphal ticks feeding on mice, then seing how and when the mice were infected.Only 58 mice were used so its a small sample BUT according to this, in the first 24 hrs NO Borrelia trnasmitted In the next 24-36 hrs a marked increase occurred. BUT in 2/3 attempts (66%) transmission of Ehrlichia DID occur!! Researchers concluded that " daily tick removal may not be adequate to prevent human infection " http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9532263 this one uses gerbils ( poor things) but here is an intersting result ALL?gerbils that had ticks for more than 47 hrs infected with Borrelia after 16.7 hrs and 28.9 hrs 50% were infected!!!! ( tick removal methods had no effect on transmission--they tested 3 methods) Id say this last one shows a faster transmission than whats usually stated!! and finally http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=266148 states that partially fed ticks will transmit faster than unfed ticks--so that means that if the tick thats biting you had previously tried to feed on another animal/human and was scratched off or fell off and then it attached to you--the safe wait time is invalid and it can be infective far faster!! http://www.ajtmh.org/cgi/content/abstract/71/3/268?? POW Virus--in 15 min transmits!! is this what you needed??? if not let me know and Ill try to find better studies Finette [the gene pool could use a little chlorine!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 Thanks Finette! This is great! Cat > > is this what you needed??? if not let me know and Ill try to find better studies > > Finette > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.