Guest guest Posted July 19, 2000 Report Share Posted July 19, 2000 Yes, the ADA includes LP's. A summary of the ADA is located at: http://janweb.icdi.wvu.edu/kinder/overview.htm And I copied part of the ADA summary that pertains to your situation: " The ADA's protection applies primarily, but not exclusively, to " disabled " individuals. An individual is " disabled " if he or she meets at least any one of the following tests: He or she has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of his/her major life activities; He or she has a record of such an impairment He or she is regarded as having such an impairment. Other individuals who are protected in certain circumstances include 1) those, such as parents, who have an association with an individual known to have a disability, and 2) those who are coerced or subjected to retaliation for assisting people with disabilities in asserting their rights under the ADA. " Hope this helps. Cyndi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2000 Report Share Posted July 19, 2000 I have had the same sorts of obstacles in our school. I am now dealing with the head of the Sp. Ed. services at the district office. The principal lost his job partly due to this situation. They never had any sort of follow through with her IEP, and due to their negligence, her hearing aids were broken beyond repair, and they will have to be replaced to the tune of $4300.! We are seriously thinking about a lawsuit, and I have documented all their foul ups since the beginning of the school year. Good Luck~ Patty ADA > Can anyone site the specific statutes of the ADA that apply to dwarfism? > As soem of you know we have been screwing around with our daughters school > and are trying to institute an ADA audit at her school. The final straws > were the school not LOWERING Her desk until April (jsut before school was > out) and the principla had noidea why...AND that the school " declassified " > her as disabled because she can now reach the drinking fountain (if she > stands on her tip toes). In the meantime they decide she was shyper becasue > she stood at her desk a lot to do her work, put her in speech therapy > without notifying us (claimed that was a misunderstandign but they based the > decision on a previous ACR....Midn you, at the beginning of this past school > year I was todl by her teacher she was doign so good she didnt NEED anotehr > IEP...and it was after this she was placed in speech (which she didnt need.) > > We have contacted the first chain of command within the ystem who has told us > the principal CANT be culpable becasue she didnt knwo about it. Teh next > person isnt too fond of me anyway....SO can anyone advise me what tod o now? > I tried to play nice but they didnt want to....so now Im feeling like the > proverbial banty hen ready to protect her chicks....Thanks > > > apryl > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Best friends, most artistic, class clown Find 'em here: > 1/7078/11/_/77518/_/964018026/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2000 Report Share Posted July 19, 2000 There are several places within the ADA that will hold up for dwarfism. My copy of the document is nearly 2 inches thick, so you have to get down to specifics. One thing is for sure " Dwarfism " is covered, and under the ADA it isn't what you'd call curable. It's also very hard to get anyone real knowledgeable of the ADA to help folks yet. I know Oregon has a Disabilities Commission because I've served on it in the past. Go to the Library and see if they have a copy of the ADA law. Remember though, it isn't just a few pages. Get yourself acquainted with it and find the avenues your daughter fits into. Judi - past member Oregon ADA Commission At 01:25 PM 7/19/00 -0700, Grant & Patty Bowers wrote: >I have had the same sorts of obstacles in our school. I am now dealing with >the head of the Sp. Ed. services at the district office. >The principal lost his job partly due to this situation. They never had any >sort of follow through with her IEP, and due to their negligence, her >hearing aids were broken beyond repair, and they will have to be replaced to >the tune of $4300.! >We are seriously thinking about a lawsuit, and I have documented all their >foul ups since the beginning of the school year. >Good Luck~ >Patty > ADA > > >> Can anyone site the specific statutes of the ADA that apply to dwarfism? >> As soem of you know we have been screwing around with our daughters school >> and are trying to institute an ADA audit at her school. The final straws >> were the school not LOWERING Her desk until April (jsut before school was >> out) and the principla had noidea why...AND that the school " declassified > " >> her as disabled because she can now reach the drinking fountain (if she >> stands on her tip toes). In the meantime they decide she was shyper >becasue >> she stood at her desk a lot to do her work, put her in speech therapy >> without notifying us (claimed that was a misunderstandign but they based >the >> decision on a previous ACR....Midn you, at the beginning of this past >school >> year I was todl by her teacher she was doign so good she didnt NEED >anotehr >> IEP...and it was after this she was placed in speech (which she didnt >need.) >> >> We have contacted the first chain of command within the ystem who has told >us >> the principal CANT be culpable becasue she didnt knwo about it. Teh next >> person isnt too fond of me anyway....SO can anyone advise me what tod o >now? >> I tried to play nice but they didnt want to....so now Im feeling like the >> proverbial banty hen ready to protect her chicks....Thanks >> >> >> apryl >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Best friends, most artistic, class clown Find 'em here: >> 1/7078/11/_/77518/_/964018026/ >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Make new friends, find the old at Classmates.com: >1/7075/11/_/77518/_/964037354/ >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2001 Report Share Posted July 11, 2001 ada Dr. Freeman, i see nothing in the ada that states it is limited to businesses with a certain number of employees. see below #6 re: office of a health care provider. perhaps you are thinking of the number of employees needed in order for an employer to provide parental leave ? remember however that i am not nor do i pretend to be a lawyer so everyone should seek their own legal counsel on this issue. My intent of bringing this forth was only to add to the 'interpreter' issue brought up by Dr. Kinne. All of these things are worth consideration and i think that the reason many of these things had to be made law is for the very fact that many people have been and still continue to be treated poorly by the inconsiderate. Is this chaos as Dr. Bertrand suggests ? Perhaps, given everything that the practicing doctor has to contend with but chaos or not some things we still have to deal with because it is the right, if not the legal, thing to do for those in need. vty, sharron fuchs dc ADA Place of public accommodation means a facility, operated by a private entity, whose operations affect commerce and fall within at least one of the following categories -- (1) An inn, hotel, motel, or other place of lodging, except for an establishment located within a building that contains not more than five rooms for rent or hire and that is actually occupied by the proprietor of the establishment as the residence of the proprietor; (2) A restaurant, bar, or other establishment serving food or drink; (3) A motion picture house, theater, concert hall, stadium, or other place of exhibition or entertainment; (4) An auditorium, convention center, lecture hall, or other place of public gathering; (5) A bakery, grocery store, clothing store, hardware store, shopping center, or other sales or rental establishment; (6) A laundromat, dry-cleaner, bank, barber shop, beauty shop, travel service, shoe repair service, funeral parlor, gas station, office of an accountant or lawyer, pharmacy, insurance office, professional office of a health care provider, hospital, or other service establishment; (7) A terminal, depot, or other station used forspecified public transportation; (8) A museum, library, gallery, or other place of public display or collection; (9) A park, zoo, amusement park, or other place of recreation; (10) A nursery, elementary, secondary, undergraduate, or postgraduate private school, or other place of education; (11) A day care center, senior citizen center, homeless shelter, food bank, adoption agency, or other social service center establishment; and (12) A gymnasium, health spa, bowling alley, golf course, or other place of exercise or recreation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2001 Report Share Posted July 11, 2001 ada Dr. Freeman, i see nothing in the ada that states it is limited to businesses with a certain number of employees. see below #6 re: office of a health care provider. perhaps you are thinking of the number of employees needed in order for an employer to provide parental leave ? remember however that i am not nor do i pretend to be a lawyer so everyone should seek their own legal counsel on this issue. My intent of bringing this forth was only to add to the 'interpreter' issue brought up by Dr. Kinne. All of these things are worth consideration and i think that the reason many of these things had to be made law is for the very fact that many people have been and still continue to be treated poorly by the inconsiderate. Is this chaos as Dr. Bertrand suggests ? Perhaps, given everything that the practicing doctor has to contend with but chaos or not some things we still have to deal with because it is the right, if not the legal, thing to do for those in need. vty, sharron fuchs dc ADA Place of public accommodation means a facility, operated by a private entity, whose operations affect commerce and fall within at least one of the following categories -- (1) An inn, hotel, motel, or other place of lodging, except for an establishment located within a building that contains not more than five rooms for rent or hire and that is actually occupied by the proprietor of the establishment as the residence of the proprietor; (2) A restaurant, bar, or other establishment serving food or drink; (3) A motion picture house, theater, concert hall, stadium, or other place of exhibition or entertainment; (4) An auditorium, convention center, lecture hall, or other place of public gathering; (5) A bakery, grocery store, clothing store, hardware store, shopping center, or other sales or rental establishment; (6) A laundromat, dry-cleaner, bank, barber shop, beauty shop, travel service, shoe repair service, funeral parlor, gas station, office of an accountant or lawyer, pharmacy, insurance office, professional office of a health care provider, hospital, or other service establishment; (7) A terminal, depot, or other station used forspecified public transportation; (8) A museum, library, gallery, or other place of public display or collection; (9) A park, zoo, amusement park, or other place of recreation; (10) A nursery, elementary, secondary, undergraduate, or postgraduate private school, or other place of education; (11) A day care center, senior citizen center, homeless shelter, food bank, adoption agency, or other social service center establishment; and (12) A gymnasium, health spa, bowling alley, golf course, or other place of exercise or recreation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2002 Report Share Posted August 25, 2002 Marge, Considering the lack of information that would have been able to support my stance on the issue (that the ADA should be only used for people with permanent disabilities), I got the OK from my English teacher to change my topic to separation of church and state in relation to public schools, since there's A LOT more information about that topic than the misuse of the ADA. If you can help on that (My thesis is " The Pledge of Allegiance should be allowed to be recited in public schools because it does not violate the clause of separation of church and state. " ), I also would be appreciative. Thanks for your help, __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 5, 2011 Report Share Posted January 5, 2011 Anyone can submit comments on the draft ADA regulations, especially regarding equipment used in places that are supposed to be accessible to the disabled (including us). Begin forwarded message: *From: *americanassociationforcellphonesafety+noreplygooglegroups *Date: *January 5, 2011 7:58:33 AM EST **Digest Recipients < americanassociationforcellphonesafety+digestgooglegroups> *Subject: **Digest for americanassociationforcellphonesafetygooglegroups - 7 Messages in 3 Topics* *Reply-*americanassociationforcellphonesafetygooglegroups Today's Topic Summary Group: http://groups.google.com/group/americanassociationforcellphonesafety/topics - Call Today - Comment on Revisions to the Americans with Disabilities Act] <#12d56734a2f70a8d_group_thread_0> [1 Update] - a victory... now the real fight begins!<#12d56734a2f70a8d_group_thread_1>[3 Updates] - Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... <#12d56734a2f70a8d_group_thread_2> [3 Updates] Topic: Call Today - Comment on Revisions to the Americans with Disabilities Act]<http://groups.google.com/group/americanassociationforcellphonesafety/t/10d4\ fa2f1de6591d> <contact@...> Jan 04 07:52PM -0700 ^<#12d56734a2f70a8d_digest_top> Hello All, I made an appointment just now... If you're having trouble viewing this email, you may see it online. Share This: For Distribution: Topic – Possibility of revising the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Regulations to address accessibility for the disabled to wireless technology and services. Take Action - Call 1-800-514-0301 to register to make oral comment at the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) ADA Hearing on January 10, 2011. Call as soon as possible as they encourage you to call 5 days in advance whether you intend to comment in person or by phone. Comment yourself and forward this information to folks you know with Implanted Medical Devices or who experience hypersensitivity to electromagnetic fields. ALTERNATIVE: Take Action - Submit written comment to the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) by January 24, 2011. Submit comment yourself or forward this information to folks you know with Implanted Medical Devices or who experience hypersensitivity to electromagnetic fields. TAKE ACTION Tell the DOJ in CRT Docket No. 110 (also RIN 1190-AA61) - related to web access - or in CRT Docket No. 113 (also RIN 1190-AA64) - related to equipment and furniture - how increasing wireless electromagnetic radiation has made and will make it more difficult for you to work, access services of State and Local Governments, and/or public accommodations by causing a disabling functional impairment for you or by rendering treatments for your disability ineffective due to electromagnetic interference. The DOJ Dockets address hearing, speech and vision disabilities. Your input is needed so that the DOJ includes the functional impairment brought on by environmental exposure to wireless devices in this proceeding. WHY? Unless we educate our government about the disabling functional impairment wireless communication can cause for those with radiofrequency sickness and medical implants, it may assume that making all libraries, public buildings, public spaces, shopping malls, hotels, motels, transportation services, etc., wireless will help all disabled Americans. The Disability Rights section of the DOJ is updating its rules for the ADA. It is studying how to help people who are disabled gain access to Web information, and to Services of State and Local Government Entities, and Public Accommodations that use wireless technology. It seeks input on how its rules on equipment and furniture need to be updated to improve accessibility for the disabled. See *** below for points to include. HOW? Call 1-800-514-0301 to register to comment orally at the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) ADA Hearing on January 10, 2011. Each speaker is allotted five minutes. You will be phoned ahead of your appointed time by DOJ staff. Additional information about the public hearing can be found at http://www.ada.gov/anprm2010/anprm_nov-jan_2010.htm The hearing is being held January 10, 2011, from 9:30 am to 4:00 pm, PST, at the San Francisco Marriott Marquis, 55 Fourth Street, San Francisco, CA 94103 Please support your oral comment with a written comment which can be submitted as follows: Submit comments, identified by RIN 1190-AA61 (or Docket ID No. 110) and RIN 1190-AA64 (or Docket ID No. 113), by any one of the following methods: Electronic: Link to the original docket related to websites and accessibility. Federal eRulemaking Web site: www.regulations.gov. Follow the Web site's instructions for submitting comments. Direct link: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#submitComment?R=0900006480b20b1\ a Regular US Mail: Disability Rights Section Civil Rights Division US Department of Justice PO Box 2885 Fairfax, VA 22031-0885 Overnight, courier, or hand delivery: Disability Rights Section Civil Rights Division US Department of Justice 1425 New York Avenue, NW Suite 4039 Washington, DC 20005. DEADLINE: Postmarked or filed electronically by January 24, 2011. ***Enough comments submitted on the topic of radiofrequency sickness as discussed below could have very positive results. Please read and participate. While access to the internet has tremendous potential value for people with disabilities, the Department of Justice needs to recognize that wireless technology emitting microwave radiation in workplaces, public buildings, places of public accommodation (government buildings, hospitals, doctor's offices, schools, airports, airplanes, buses, trains, restaurants, shopping malls, museums, etc), transportation, and other areas of American life is seriously limiting the ability of a growing segment of the American population to participate in civil society and community life. The DOJ Dockets address hearing, speech and vision disabilities. Your input is needed so that the DOJ includes the functional impairment brought on by environmental exposure to wireless devices in this proceeding. The microwave radiation from wireless technology causes serious functional impairment to many whose symptoms have been characterized under the name radiofrequency sickness. The symptoms can range from discomfort to life-threatening depending on the exposure and the individual involved. Please see “Provocation Study using Heart Rate Variability Shows Radiation from 2.4 GHz Cordless Phone Affects Autonomic Nervous System” (Eur. J. Oncol. Library, vol. 5) at http://electromagnetichealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Havas_HRV_Ramazzini1\ ..pdfto read about how potentially serious the effects can be on the heart. The ADA Dockets ask a number of questions related specifically to different aspects of website and physical accessibility. At the end of the Docket 110 - related to internet access – is the question: " Are there additional issues or information not addressed by the Department's questions that are important for the Department to consider?” Please provide as much detail as possible in your response. " Docket 113 relates to furniture and equipment. WiFi deployed in a building, wireless inventory systems or communications systems, etc., would all constitute problematic furniture and equipment. Please submit your testimony under both dockets. Below are some points to consider and incorporate in your comments. Please be sure to personalize your comment with examples from your experience. You do not need to worry about providing a comprehensive summary of the science. The EMR Policy Institute will cover that in its comment. Points: DOJ should issue a supplemental NPRM (Notice of Proposed Rule Making) to explicitly address radiofrequency sickness and related environmentally-induced functional impairments. Accommodations for disabilities in hearing, speech and vision do not address all disability issues for emerging electronic technologies. Radiofrequency Sickness, a functional impairment which is caused by exposure to transmitted radiofrequency radiation and electrical pollution, needs to be clearly addressed by the DOJ in the rules governing Title I, Title II and Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. ADA rules need to explicitly reflect the very serious nature of radiofrequency sickness and require that workplaces, public places and places of public accommodation provide internet access on wires or fiber optic cables only. (List examples of places you are excluded from due to your environmentally-induced functional impairment.) ADA rules also need to explicitly require utility companies to exempt persons with radiofrequency sickness from installation of transmitting utility meters at their homes and neighboring homes. Persons with relatives with radiofrequency sickness should be able to request this accommodation as well so that sufferers is able to visit and are not excluded from family life due to transmitting meters. Additional actions the DOJ should consider: The preemption of state and local authority over emissions from Personal Wireless Services Facilities found in Section 704 of the 1996 Telecommunications Act is an unreasonable restriction of the right to free speech and to redress of grievances and should be repealed. Persons with radiofrequency sickness need an entity where they can file complaints and that can and will take action on their behalf. Thus far, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, FDA, and FCC have refused to fulfill these roles. Radiofrequency radiation exposures increase risk of disease among the whole population and in the natural world. True safety regulations need to be enacted to protect the health of the public (including babies, children, pregnant women, the ill, persons with Implanted Medical Devices) and the environment during real-life daily exposures experienced from multiple real-life sources of wireless technology and electrically-polluting devices (see www.electricalpollution.com for more information). The EPA's efforts to do this were halted in the 1990s. It time for the EPA to complete this work. Under the current inadequate guidelines the number of people who are succumbing to radiofrequency sickness is rising daily. There should be a nationwide moratorium on additional antennas and additional wireless devices until true safety regulations are in place. Please try to make as many of these points as possible in the context of your personal experience. It is essential that a significant number of people file comments. We need numbers or we will be ignored so please pass this on to other affected individuals. The Department of Justice does have a history of listening where other agencies have not. Do help us and help yourself by filing a comment. If you are concerned about having personally-identifying information posted on the internet, please read the instructions in the dockets below for instructions on how to avoid that when filing your comment. http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b20b\ 1aLink to the DOJ docket related to websites and accessibility. http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b20b\ 7a Link to the DOJ docket related to furniture and equipment. PO Box 117 | Marshfield, VT 05658 US This email was sent to lkelley_45@.... To ensure that you continue receiving our emails, please add us to your address book or safe list. manage your preferences | opt out using TrueRemove™ Got this as a forward? Sign up to receive our future emails. Network for Good EmailNow powered by Emma No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.449 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3356 - Release Date: 01/04/11 07:34:00 Topic: a victory... now the real fight begins!<http://groups.google.com/group/americanassociationforcellphonesafety/t/1\ 2500183d77b482f> " Boxer " <eboxer@...> Jan 04 07:12PM -0500 ^<#12d56734a2f70a8d_digest_top> Hi all... The good news from here in Maine is the PUC ruled to open an investigation into the technical and economic feasibility of allowing smart meter opt-outs. They are going to in vestigate whether central Maine Power's position on not allowing opt-outs is " unreasonable " (duh ) It was really good news, because CMP had wanted them to toss out our complaint. The other piece of good news was that the PUC acknowledged the studies on BOTH sides of the RF issue, and the uncertainty, even though Commissioners said they were not taking up the health issue, just the choice issue. So moving forward, clearly CMP will bring out its hired guns to show why opt-outs would throw the entire system in to disarray, render it inoperable, and would jeapordize the entire federal grant from the Department of Energy, etc... So... does anyone know of any experts who could say otherwise? Who could show how opt-outs are reasonable and feasible both economically and technically? Thank you so much! And thanks for all your good energy... it really helped us today! <contact@...> Jan 04 06:01PM -0700 ^<#12d56734a2f70a8d_digest_top> Wow!!! Fantastic !! The choice issue os the way to go!! That is what we are doing with cell phones and also should be what we do with cell towers. There is no freedom of choice whatsoever. In the paper I recently sent out in the legal section, this could be a constitutional infringement on our rights if they take away our right to choose. You should call Sage and see if she has anything she can offer regarding the info you need. I will also make a call to an attorney I know. Very awesome. Some more awesome news...we have been making calls today to get people to co-sponsor the warning label in Oregon...I think it's a done deal on the Health Committee, where the bill will most likely be heard. We may have the majority we need to get it out of committee!!! I will know for sure very soon, but it looks like we have as either sponsors or co-sponsor, the majority of the committee!!! That is one hurdle...now we just need the majority of the senate and then the house...(uy givolt!!) LOL it's only 43 votes total...It is do-able. I am probably going to Oregon next week to help lobby. I will let you know what the attorney says. Awesome work !!! xo, Liz --- Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... Dearest Peeps, Please delete the last email I sent you and use this one for the link to the Non-Thermal paper!! It had some typos which and a few others were kind enough to send me notes on. I made the corrections and have re-posted the paper, so the old link won't work but this new one will. http://www.americanassociationforcellphonesafety.org/uploads/Non_Thermal_Pap er_10-10_AAA.pdf I am utterly thrilled with the response the paper has received thus far...4 new people wanting to bring the legislation to their local council or state and it's only one day after Christmas!!! I look forward to working with anyone of you's out there who would like to bring a warning label bill to your city, county or state. I also look forward to continuing our work at the federal level very soon and to boning up on my own " how to fight a cell tower " skills. I have recently been bombarded with some " new and improved " infrastructure and am writing you this email swathed in shielding!!! The radiation has gotten awfully dense where I am living. I think I may have to move. Don't mean to bum you out on Christmas. I am having a jolly time besides being irradiated. LOL But seriously, I have brought this bill to my local LA County Board of Supervisors and may be in touch with some of you about how to get some o these antennas out of here!!! I hope you all are having a Wonderful holiday. To our success on this issue in 2011 and to all of you who work so tirelessly to make change on this incredibly difficult situation. I know how hard it is...but we will ultimately prevail. Lots of love, Liz= McAfee Lecturer/Horn Instructor, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Music Director/Conductor Triangle Youth Ballet Former Principal Horn, North Carolina Symphony (1992-2007) 919.787.3022 (home) 919.962-2492 (office) andrewmcafee1@... www.hornlessons.org w Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2011 Report Share Posted January 29, 2011 ADA The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) is a law that was enacted by the U.S. Congress in 1990. It was signed into law on July 26, 1990, by President H. W. Bush, and later amended with changes effective January 1, 2009. The ADA is a wide-ranging civil rights law that prohibits, under certain circumstances, discrimination based on disability. It affords similar protections against discrimination to Americans with disabilities as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which made discrimination based on race, religion, sex, national origin, and other characteristics illegal. Disability is defined by the ADA as "a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity." The determination of whether any particular condition is considered a disability is made on a case by case basis. Certain specific conditions are excluded as disabilities, such as current substance abuse and visual impairment which is correctable by prescription lenses. On September 25, 2008, President W. Bush signed into law the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (ADAAA). This was intended to give broader protections for disabled workers and "turn back the clock" on court rulings which Congress deemed too restrictive. The ADAAA includes a list of "major life activities". 1 Titles of the ADA 1.1 Title I - Employment 1.2 Title II - Public Entities (and public transportation) 1.3 Title III - Public Accommodations (and Commercial Facilities) 1.4 Title IV - Telecommunications 1.5 Title V - Miscellaneous Provisions 2 Major life activities Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.