Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

stem cell transplant

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

DIAD: Division of Immunotherapy and Autoimmune Diseases anyone that has MS, Devic's and is not doing well with LDN or prescription drugs should check this web site out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

What is even greater about stem cell is that the adipose method now

makes adult stem cell even better because it produces 10 times the

number of stem cells than bone marrow and is less invasive.

Judy and I just returned from having adult stem cell in the Dominican

Republic. Looking forward to seeing the results we get over the next 3

months.

You can join the stem cell group to learn more by going to StemCellDR@

Also it is now about 1/3 to 1/2 the original cost if you go to the

Dominican Republic. Stem cell is now only $6500 which includes the

beautiful resort hotel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest guest

By Chris' own admission, transplants result in an overall

survival of 65%. Since transplants aren't usually done on

healthy patients at diagnosis, but reserved for the time

when all else fails, 65% survival isn't that bad.

The alternative is probably 10% survival without the

transplant.

You do the math.

Sometimes people are just negative without justification.

(It's not something to take lightly, but faced with

certainty of death, it may be an option for some. I've

seen a number of people recently who have had transplants,

and some of them do pretty well. Remember, Dr. Hamblin only

has the English experience, and not what Stanford or

Hutchinson in Seattle can do.)

___________________________________

Posted by: " cllcanada " Apr 10, 2011 10:02 am

<snipped by moderator>

The recent major allogeneic stem cell transplantation

clinical trial, CLL3X from German, with a median follow up

of 46 months found, achieved 4-year nonrelapse mortality

(NRM) of 23%, event-free survival (EFS) 42%, and overall

survival (OS) 65%.

This is hardly a cure...

~chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

That is a 4 year overall survival of 65% based on one study.

These were NOT patients on death's doorstep...

They were 'Poor-Risk' patients...based on the follow criteria:

quote

Eligible were patients with poor-risk CLL as defined by one

of the following: refractoriness or early relapse (within 12

months) after treatment with a purine analogue-containing

regimen, relapse after autologous SCT, or progressive

disease in the presence of an unfavourable genetic

constellation (11q-, 17p-, and/or unmutated IGHV status

and/or usage of the VH3-21 gene). Patients had to be between

18 and 65 years of age with normal organ function and an

Eastern ative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status

of 1 or better.

end quote

Want the facts, read the paper:

http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/content/116/14/2438.full.pdf

or

http://tinyurl.com/3wnf8yg

~chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...