Fw: Returned mail: see transcript for details

[Guest guest]

-----Original Message-----

From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@...>

MAM-NSIF@... <MAM-NSIF@...>

Date: Sunday, July 30, 2000 12:54 AM

Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details

>The original message was received at Sun, 30 Jul 2000 01:54:09 -0400

>from nas-49-64.dallas.navipath.net [216.67.49.64]

>

> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----

>< @egroups>

> (reason: 550 Host unknown)

>

> ----- Transcript of session follows -----

>550 5.1.2 < @egroups>... Host unknown (Name server: egroups.:

host not found)

>

What difference does it make unless you're in an out-house (do people still

have those?)???

MM

-----Original Message-----

From: J. Ayers <urpurdy@...>

Channing Ayers <greenlit@...>; gmc gerriann

<GMCabac@...>; ilena rose <ilena@...>; J Jeanette Samberg

<JJ677@...>; Jama Russano <JRussano@...>; Kay

<DearKay@...>; Lynda Roth <coss1@...>; MARTHA-NSIF@...

(by way of ilena <MAM-NSIF@...>; Marti s

<legalconcern@...>; maybelle (by way of ilena rose)

<maybelle@...>; Myrl Jeffcoat <myrlj@...>; PAT AND SUSAN

RODRIGUEZ (by way of ilena rose) <hyperbaric1@...>; Rogene Schorer

<saxony01@...>; Sami Lucas <MMRM1014@...>; Sherry Calvert

<GatorHART@...>

Date: Sunday, July 30, 2000 12:29 AM

Subject: [Fwd: Fw: The Perverts won't like this!!!]

>

>

[Guest guest]

-----Original Message-----

From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@...>

MAM-NSIF@... <MAM-NSIF@...>

Date: Sunday, September 10, 2000 2:52 AM

Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details

>The original message was received at Sun, 10 Sep 2000 03:52:07 -0400

>from nas-48-41.dallas.navipath.net [216.67.48.41]

>

> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----

><SBI-Talk@egroups>

> (reason: 550 Host unknown)

>< @egroups>

> (reason: 550 Host unknown)

>

> ----- Transcript of session follows -----

>550 5.1.2 <SBI-Talk@egroups>,< @egroups>... Host unknown (Name

server: egroups.: host not found)

>

Hi Ilena, Please Post -- mm / tx

Join With Women From Around the World to Talk Health

WHAT: Women's International Symposium on Health (WISH) WHEN: Monday, October 16, 2000 WHERE: Washington, D.C. WHY: To convene women from the U.S. and around the world to discuss health-related concerns and opportunities. Participants will develop understanding and action plans for such diverse issues as family planning, breast cancer, AIDS, environment-related illnesses, access to health care and increased living standards worldwide. WISH is scheduled to coincide with the World March of Women 2000. FULL SCHEDULE: Sunday, October 15 World March of Women - U.S. Action Organized by NOW Washington, D.C. Monday, October 16 Women's International Symposium on Health (WISH) Organized by NOW Foundation Washington, D.C. Tuesday, October 17 World March of Women - Finale of International Delegations United Nations People's Assembly New York City For more information on WISH and the World March of Women 2000, please visit the NOW web site at www.now.org/worldmarch.html or call the NOW Action Center at 202-628-8669, press 0 for the receptionist and ask for the March Team.

[Guest guest]

Martha Murdock, Director

National Silicone Implant Foundation

Dallas, Texas Headquarters

-----Original Message-----

From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@...>

MAM-NSIF@... <MAM-NSIF@...>

Date: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:42 AM

Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details

>The original message was received at Thu, 1 Feb 2001 04:42:32 -0500

>from nas-89-155.dallas.navipath.net [216.67.89.155]

>

> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----

><salineSupport@...>

> (reason: 554 delivery error: dd This user doesn't have a

account (@...) - mta510.mail.)

>

> ----- Transcript of session follows -----

>... while talking to mx1.mail..:

>>>> DATA

><<< 554 delivery error: dd This user doesn't have a account

(@...) - mta510.mail.

>554 5.0.0 <salineSupport@...>... Service unavailable

>

Was asked to forward this information!

Martha Murdock, DirectorNational Silicone Implant FoundationDallas, Texas Headquarters

-----Original Message-----From: ParfumGigi@... <ParfumGigi@...>SBI-Talk <SBI-Talk >Cc: SBIPrayerForum <SBIPrayerForum >; MAM-NSIF@... <MAM-NSIF@...>; kkjohnston@... <kkjohnston@...>; PEEPERLY@... <PEEPERLY@...>; ilena@... <ilena@...>; LPar902210@... <LPar902210@...>; Lv7dove7@... <Lv7dove7@...>; RAve456201@... <RAve456201@...>; lillian45usa@... <lillian45usa@...>; Dowlied@... <Dowlied@...>; lorenn@... <lorenn@...>; REABEEE@... <REABEEE@...>; Gimfl@... <Gimfl@...>; UBCDan@... <UBCDan@...>; Sam@... <Sam@...>; Sea2322@... <Sea2322@...>; myrlj@... <myrlj@...>; NEspina@... <NEspina@...>; nye822@... <nye822@...>; HORSRASER2@... <HORSRASER2@...>; sharynn2@... <sharynn2@...>; Cow22girl@... <Cow22girl@...>; Desertmouse@... <Desertmouse@...>; janmarh@... <janmarh@...>; turnerdl@... <turnerdl@...>; Apaloon@... <Apaloon@...>; Sweetmee2@... <Sweetmee2@...>Date: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:33 AMSubject: From: CPR4WandF Letter to the editor of Time in latest issuePlease pass this on as always, Martha can you post it to the saline groups. Thank you again.. Peace, truth, and research now, gigi/ S. Lawrence President, NSIF Director, Martha Murdock Some of you saw Time magazine's brief reference to breast implants, which suggested that the latest NIH study indicated they do not cause breast cancer. Our staff scientist wrote a response that was published in the latest issue of Time: Implants Affect Mammograms The article " Your A To Z Guide To The Year In Medicine " [THE FUTURE OF DRUGS, Jan. 15] correctly cited a National Institutes of Health study that concluded there is no evidence that breast-implant patients have an added risk for breast cancer. However, you failed to note that the NIH study and other new research show that implants can cause a delay in the diagnosis of breast cancer because they interfere with the ability of a mammogram to reveal breast cancer. A delay in diagnosis means a delay in treatment, which can be fatal. Unfortunately, even with specialized mammograms, almost 30% of cancers in women with implants may not be visible because implants block the view. The problem increases with larger implants or if the implants cause the breasts to harden. PATRICIA LIEBERMAN National Center for Policy Research for Women and Families ----------------------- Zuckerman, Ph.D. Executive Director National Center for Policy Research for Women and Families 1444 Eye Street, NW Suite 900 Washington, DC 20005 http://www.cpr4womenandfamilies.org/

[Guest guest]

Martha Murdock, Director

National Silicone Implant Foundation

Dallas, Texas Headquarters

-----Original Message-----

From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@...>

MAM-NSIF@... <MAM-NSIF@...>

Date: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:42 AM

Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details

>The original message was received at Thu, 1 Feb 2001 04:42:32 -0500

>from nas-89-155.dallas.navipath.net [216.67.89.155]

>

> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----

><salineSupport@...>

> (reason: 554 delivery error: dd This user doesn't have a

account (@...) - mta510.mail.)

>

> ----- Transcript of session follows -----

>... while talking to mx1.mail..:

>>>> DATA

><<< 554 delivery error: dd This user doesn't have a account

(@...) - mta510.mail.

>554 5.0.0 <salineSupport@...>... Service unavailable

>

Was asked to forward this information!

Martha Murdock, DirectorNational Silicone Implant FoundationDallas, Texas Headquarters

-----Original Message-----From: ParfumGigi@... <ParfumGigi@...>SBI-Talk <SBI-Talk >Cc: SBIPrayerForum <SBIPrayerForum >; MAM-NSIF@... <MAM-NSIF@...>; kkjohnston@... <kkjohnston@...>; PEEPERLY@... <PEEPERLY@...>; ilena@... <ilena@...>; LPar902210@... <LPar902210@...>; Lv7dove7@... <Lv7dove7@...>; RAve456201@... <RAve456201@...>; lillian45usa@... <lillian45usa@...>; Dowlied@... <Dowlied@...>; lorenn@... <lorenn@...>; REABEEE@... <REABEEE@...>; Gimfl@... <Gimfl@...>; UBCDan@... <UBCDan@...>; Sam@... <Sam@...>; Sea2322@... <Sea2322@...>; myrlj@... <myrlj@...>; NEspina@... <NEspina@...>; nye822@... <nye822@...>; HORSRASER2@... <HORSRASER2@...>; sharynn2@... <sharynn2@...>; Cow22girl@... <Cow22girl@...>; Desertmouse@... <Desertmouse@...>; janmarh@... <janmarh@...>; turnerdl@... <turnerdl@...>; Apaloon@... <Apaloon@...>; Sweetmee2@... <Sweetmee2@...>Date: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:33 AMSubject: From: CPR4WandF Letter to the editor of Time in latest issuePlease pass this on as always, Martha can you post it to the saline groups. Thank you again.. Peace, truth, and research now, gigi/ S. Lawrence President, NSIF Director, Martha Murdock Some of you saw Time magazine's brief reference to breast implants, which suggested that the latest NIH study indicated they do not cause breast cancer. Our staff scientist wrote a response that was published in the latest issue of Time: Implants Affect Mammograms The article " Your A To Z Guide To The Year In Medicine " [THE FUTURE OF DRUGS, Jan. 15] correctly cited a National Institutes of Health study that concluded there is no evidence that breast-implant patients have an added risk for breast cancer. However, you failed to note that the NIH study and other new research show that implants can cause a delay in the diagnosis of breast cancer because they interfere with the ability of a mammogram to reveal breast cancer. A delay in diagnosis means a delay in treatment, which can be fatal. Unfortunately, even with specialized mammograms, almost 30% of cancers in women with implants may not be visible because implants block the view. The problem increases with larger implants or if the implants cause the breasts to harden. PATRICIA LIEBERMAN National Center for Policy Research for Women and Families ----------------------- Zuckerman, Ph.D. Executive Director National Center for Policy Research for Women and Families 1444 Eye Street, NW Suite 900 Washington, DC 20005 http://www.cpr4womenandfamilies.org/

[Guest guest]

Martha Murdock, Director

National Silicone Implant Foundation

Dallas, Texas Headquarters

-----Original Message-----

From: MARTHA <MAM-NSIF@...>

< >

Date: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:51 AM

Subject: Fw: Returned mail: see transcript for details

>

>Martha Murdock, Director

>National Silicone Implant Foundation

>Dallas, Texas Headquarters

>

>-----Original Message-----

>From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@...>

>MAM-NSIF@... <MAM-NSIF@...>

>Date: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:42 AM

>Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details

>

>

>>The original message was received at Thu, 1 Feb 2001 04:42:32 -0500

>>from nas-89-155.dallas.navipath.net [216.67.89.155]

>>

>> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----

>><salineSupport@...>

>> (reason: 554 delivery error: dd This user doesn't have a

>account (@...) - mta510.mail.)

>>

>> ----- Transcript of session follows -----

>>... while talking to mx1.mail..:

>>>>> DATA

>><<< 554 delivery error: dd This user doesn't have a account

>(@...) - mta510.mail.

>>554 5.0.0 <salineSupport@...>... Service unavailable

>>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Martha Murdock, Director

National Silicone Implant Foundation

Dallas, Texas Headquarters

-----Original Message-----

From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@...>

MAM-NSIF@... <MAM-NSIF@...>

Date: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 3:24 AM

Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details

>The original message was received at Tue, 6 Feb 2001 04:24:55 -0500

>from nas-89-117.dallas.navipath.net [216.67.89.117]

>

> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----

>< @groups>

> (reason: 550 Host unknown)

>

> ----- Transcript of session follows -----

>550 5.1.2 < @groups>... Host unknown (Name server:

groups.: host not found)

>

Well, I must say this is really exhilerating information for me, personally,

as well as all the other Dow women. Would someone just 'cut to the chase'

and tell us when we can expect Dow to issue a check, in any amount, for any

reason, in this next centinnial?

Most sincerely,

MM / NSIF

Martha Murdock, Director

National Silicone Implant Foundation

Dallas, Texas Headquarters

-----Original Message-----

From: ilena rose <ilena@...>

Recipient List Suppressed:; <Recipient List Suppressed:;>

Date: Monday, February 05, 2001 7:02 PM

Subject: Marti on: Dow Settlement Compensation Schedule & Donating Bodyfor

Research

>From Marti:

>__________________________________________________________

>

>I would suggest posting a reference to the " Plan Documents " at this

website --

>

> http://www.implantclaims.com/plandocs/index.html

>

>* Annex A (disease descriptions/criteria start at pg 84 for Option I,

> and start at pg. 99 for Option II)

> NOTE: Option II levels of disease include the claimant's selection of a

>specific 24-month period in which all qualifying documentation must fall,

see

>page A-99. It would be wise to review your medical records in anticipation

of

>how this rule applies to your claim and what you could do about choosing

>the best

>24-month period for you. The two year period can be moved over a number of

>years, but your qualifying documentation must fit within a 24-month window.

See

>page A-99 because this could be time-consuming for you to resolve down the

>road.

>

>* Disclosure Statement (compensation grid, page 20)

> NOTE: Amounts are subject to bankruptcy racheting/reduction, see page

94

>

>There has been a Motion for Rehearing (another word for it is

Reconsideration)

>before Judge Hood's court that had to be dealt with before Appeals could

move

>forward in the Court of Appeals of the 6th Circuit. Judge Hood just made

her

>decision today and it is posted at the court's website:

>

> http://www.mied.uscourts.gov/dow/default.htm

>

>Stays were filed by various parties together with their Motions for

Rehearing

>after Judge Hood, Dist. Court of Michigan, had ruled on the Plan overall.

The

>Motions for Rehearing were about the issue of the release of Shareholders,

such

>as Dow Chemical. Although the Motion for Rehearing was denied today, the

>possibility of a Stay could occur. If Dow Corning were to attempt to

implement

>the Plan, they have agreed to notify parties at which time a Motion for

Stay

>could be filed.

>

>The Plan is not moving forward, except it's Appeals, which could go to the

US

>Supreme Court after the 6th Circuit. There is no " Effective Date " for the

Plan

>when Participation Forms would be mailed out.

>

>Marti s

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Martha Murdock, Director

National Silicone Implant Foundation | Dallas Headquarters

" Supporting Survivors of Medical Implant Devices "

4416 Willow Lane

Dallas, TX 75244-7537

----- Original Message -----

From: " Mail Delivery Subsystem " <MAILER-DAEMON@...>

<MAM-NSIF@...>

Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 1:02 AM

Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details

> The original message was received at Sat, 29 Jun 2002 02:02:10 -0400

> from ppp-208-188-22-12.dialup.rcsntx.swbell.net [208.188.22.12]

>

> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----

> < Groups@... / e Rene>

> (reason: 550 Host unknown)

>

> ----- Transcript of session follows -----

> 550 5.1.2 < Groups@... / e Rene>... Host unknown

(Name server: /justine.rene.: host not found)

>

Hi e,

What would it take to get you to this FDA meeting, where I think you could 'blow the rest of the away'!???

MM

Martha Murdock, DirectorNational Silicone Implant Foundation | Dallas Headquarters"Supporting Survivors of Medical Implant Devices"4416 Willow LaneDallas, TX 75244-7537

----- Original Message ----- From: Zuckerman

Martha Murdock

Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 12:45 PM

Subject: July 9 FDA meeting on saline implants

Dear Friends,

I want to make sure you know that on July 9 the FDA is holding a meeting of the Advisory Committee that recommended approval of saline breast implants in March 2000. They will look at new research, probably on women who have had saline implants for 3-5 years. The meeting will be in Gaithersburg, approx 20 miles from Washington, DC.

They probably won't be making any decisions, but presumably will express their opinions. I haven't seen the studies, so I don't know what they show.

The public can testify (5 minutes each). If you live nearby, I hope you'll come and testify. I don't think its worth a long trip, to be honest.

I'll be away til July 7, but if you have any questions, contact our office.

Sincerely,

Zuckerman, Ph.D.PresidentNational Center for Policy Research (CPR) for Women & Families1901 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWSuite 901Washington, DC 20006202 223-4000www.center4policy.org

[Guest guest]

BETH' S SURGERY

> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 09:05:21 -0400

> MIME-Version: 1.0

> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

> boundary= " ----=_NextPart_000_0047_01C2FF40.50A75A90 "

> X-Priority: 3

> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal

> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106

> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

>

[Guest guest]

Well Patti, you mail came back so I'll just poist it here.

------ Forwarded Message

From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@...>

Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 10:00:44 -0700 (PDT)

<jahroni@...>

Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details

Patti: check out our website

Www.nwwls.com

If you have a BMI less than 46 and no other serious medical conditions you

can get banded as an outpatient for a total cost of about $16-17,000

including one year of follow-up. If you need to be hospitalized overnight

the cost is about $22K.

We use Evergreen Hospital and Medical Center in Kirkland, Washington. It is

a very, very nice top of the line facility.

Call me and I'll send you an info packet or you could come to our free

informational seminars on Wednesday evenings. Call to get the date and

reserve a seat.

425-899-4610

Jessie H. Ahroni, PhD, ARNP

Banded since 10/3/1998

------ End of Forwarded Message