Guest guest Posted January 18, 2003 Report Share Posted January 18, 2003 Hello, This is my first post and I am new to this group. I'm considering a calorie restricted diet to improve my odds of a longer, healthy life. I believe I could have sufficient discipline if I had sufficient reason to believe the calorie restriction would work. I've had insulin dependent diabetes for 32 years. I'm 47, I've been following a vegan diet for 10 years, and my diabetes has always been very difficult to control. So far, I'm in very good shape, but I've had some peripheral neuropathy for about 10 years, primarily evidenced by muscle atrophy and increased scarring/reduced healing from slight scrapes on my lower legs. I also have high (260) cholesterol (must be genetic or diabetes linked, cause it can't be diet). I just spoke with someone today about going on a statin. However, from what I recall reading in Scientific American a few years back, part of the the theoretical mechanism by which calorie restriction supposedly works is that it lowers average blood sugar levels. But my blood sugar is just too volatile and high. It seems doubtful that calorie restriction would lower my average blood sugar to anything even remotely close to what a non-diabetic on a normal diet would expect (80-120 mg/dl), much less the even lower average observed in non-diabetics on calorie restriction. Would I be wasting my time (depriving myself for no possible benefit) if I restricted my calories? I'm thinking I should pursue an islet transplant, but I'd still need to get accepted to clinical trials and, as you may know, I'd need to take immune suppressing drugs. Any thoughts or advice? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.