Guest guest Posted November 4, 2002 Report Share Posted November 4, 2002 This is a follow up article to one I posted last week. Adding Years means examining realistically what can be changed: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A54858-2002Nov1.html In the article: For example, fortification of food with iron (in cereal flours or noodles), zinc (in wheat products) and vitamin A (in sugar) is cost-effective even for the poorest countries, because it would greatly reduce death from diarrhea, malaria, measles and pneumonia in children. Recommended population-wide interventions, however, aren't limited to micronutrients or the diseases of the poor. Dietary salt contributes to high blood pressure, a top-10 risk factor for early death everywhere in the world. Regional strategies to reduce salt in processed food have been tried in Australia. Studies show that when guidelines for food manufacturers are voluntary, dietary sodium intake falls about 15 percent. When they are mandatory, it falls about 30 percent. Similarly, mass marketing campaigns to reduce dietary fat lead to about a 2 percent reduction in average cholesterol level over a decade. For an individual that's a small change, but in a population it leads to a significant drop in cardiovascular mortality. That's because in most places, nearly everyone has cholesterol above the truly " safe " level. Consequently, when a population's average cholesterol falls, it means that nearly everyone has cut his risk, not just the people with the highest levels. The more common prevention strategy in the developed world, however, is to look for people with increased risk, and aim preventive measures only at them. The WHO team found this also works. High blood pressure is enough of a problem, it noted, that screening adults for hypertension and treating everyone with a systolic blood pressure over 160 with a cheap diuretic drug is cost-effective even in the poorest countries. A third way, however, may offer the best approach to cardiovascular disease, which is the leading cause of death in rich countries and an important one everywhere else. It combines aspects of both population-wide and individually targeted prevention. Every individual's risk would be evaluated on the basis of age, sex, a few facts of personal medical history, a blood pressure measurement and possibly also a cholesterol measurement. If the profile revealed risk above a specified threshold -- say, that a person had a 25 percent chance of suffering a heart attack or stroke in the ensuing decade -- he or she would then be prescribed a one-size-fits-all treatment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.