Guest guest Posted November 3, 2002 Report Share Posted November 3, 2002 Diabetes seems to be more out front in the news lately, perhaps because it seems to go hand in hand with the obesity situation. I just digested TIME magazine for 11/04/02 and it has a special 15-page information and advertising section on this subject. I learned it takes 2 donors for one of the islet cell transplants; 4000 donor organs are available per year, while there are " about " 1 million Type-1's living with the disease; while the US Gov't limits stem cell research. They also mention new non- penetrative bloodsugar monitors. I am going to follow up some of the organizational links provided and see if i can learn more about the cost, availability, and viability of such devices. BTW, on a semi-related subject - hypoglycemia - i came to a tentative conclusion on something i'd suspected before. When i breakfast solely on beans - i mean around 400 calories of cooked soybean - my sugar level seems to stay solid til i eat again, which may be around 8 PM. On the other hand, if i include substantial more carbs in breakfast, like a sweetpotato, i seem to sense running low on gas by early afternoon. ( I have enuff experience with suffering with this challenge, that i am very sensitive to to indications and onset of plummeting sugar. ) What is interesting, to me anyway, is that my one big meal, quite late at night, is quite large in carbs, yet it really doesn't bother me afterward or the next day. What i mean is, i am less " sensitive " to carbohydrate, as the day goes on. Part of this effect is mixed in with body being habituated to certain eating patterns - i mean i think more insulin is released, or is somehow readied for release, at certain " learned " times of day, the accustomed mealtimes. Hue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2002 Report Share Posted November 3, 2002 I recalled i had saved the Eugene, Oregon newspaper 'Register-Guard' for 8/12/02, with a front page article, photo, and drawings under the title " Clinical Trials: Hope for Diabetics " . " Doctors at the U. of Edmonton developed a new technique....in 2000.... " Of 33 Canadian patients monitored since 2000, 15 no longer have to take insulin, 15 need fewer shots... " Now doctors in Seattle and 8 other centers....are trying the protocol... " Kresse found a website and saw that she fit the parameters for the trial: she was lean, had type 1 diabetes longer than 5 years....and significant problems with metabolic control of glucose levels... " On May 30, she got her first transplant at Virginia Mason Medical Center in Seattle. " ...Patients require 2 transplants and sometimes 3 because a single pancreas doesn't yield enough islets for a patient to make adequate amounts of insulin. There is a website referenced: www.pnri.org/hits yes, that's the way it's printed, with " h i t s " the word. I could not reach the website either with the /hits or just the homepage; i have hispeed access so i must assume at this time, the site has reached max capacity. I had saved this article to mail to a friend gal who also very closely meets those requirements. But postponed it again after reading afterward about the limited number of patients taken. I think i will mail it anyway. So your mention of this topic, Francesca, may do some longterm good in unexpected places. Hue ( Albany, Oregon ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2002 Report Share Posted November 3, 2002 --- Francesca Skelton <fskelton@e...> wrote: > This week's Parade magazine supplement to many weekend > newspapers has an article on Diabetes. I can't find it > online yet, but if I do I'll post the link. Here's what I found in the news: Cereal Fiber Intake May Be Protective Against Diabetes By NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Oct 30 - Eating cereal fiber appears to lower the risk of diabetes in whites, but not in blacks, researchers report in the October issue of Diabetes Care. Dr. June s of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and colleagues note that studies of dietary fiber intake and diabetes have had mixed results. Some show a considerable effect and others demonstrate no significant association. To investigate further, the researchers studied 12,251 subjects aged from 45 to 64 years. Over 9 years of follow-up, 1447 developed diabetes. The incidence was greater in blacks (17.5%) than in whites (10.2%). There was no association between glycemic index and diabetes in either blacks or whites. This was also true of factors including total dietary fiber, and intake of legume fiber and fruit fiber. Cereal fiber intake was inversely associated with the risk of diabetes in both blacks and whites, but this association reached statistical significance only in whites. For whites, the hazard ratio for diabetes was 0.75 in the highest compared to the lowest quintile of cereal fiber intake. The corresponding figure for blacks was 0.86. The researchers suggest that this lack of a significant association may have been due to a small sample size, and they call for further studies in this " and other ethnic groups that are at increased risk for this disease. " Furthermore, as Dr. s told Reuters Health, " given the explosion in the worldwide rates of diabetes that is following on the heels of the obesity epidemic, we need to be working hard to develop programs to prevent obesity and diabetes. At the same time it is very important to have more research on the impact of dietary fiber and other dietary factors on the development of the disease. " Diabetes Care 2002;25:1715-1721. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2002 Report Share Posted November 3, 2002 --- Francesca Skelton <fskelton@e...> wrote: > Also, the latest research suggests that those who eat > whole grains, such as cereals have the lowest diabetes > incidence. Whole grains appear to increase the efficiency > of insulin, so that less is required to metabolize sugar. > (I recall a well respected CRONIE preaching that grains > can safely be omitted from the diet - well omit an entire > food group at your own risk - I'm sticking with Suz's > " Checklist for CRON Variety " in the files......) Whatever their benefits might be, grains have a good number of problems associated with them - e.g.: http://www.beyondveg.com/cordain-l/grains-leg/grains-legumes-1a.shtml " Omitting an entire food group " does not seem like a particularly unreasonable response to me. It is not as though it is a group of foods that most of our ancestors had anything to do with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2002 Report Share Posted November 3, 2002 Hi Hue, On hypoglycemia, I don't usually have a problem except with certain foods, like grits. A cup of grits will knock me out, but put some fat on it like egg yokes or butter and the effect doesn't happen at all. Only with grits - not potatoes - not sugar - not rice. Sometimes noodle soup if it has a lot of noodles. I avoid low-on-gas by eating more meals/snacks. I never noticed the effect with beans, but I don;t eat a lot of beans except some green beans and peas. I'm mostly vegetarian except for milk, and occasional seafood gumbo. So maybe spacing is the answer, small (350 kcal) meals. Regards. ----- Original Message ----- From: Hue Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 9:12 PM Subject: Re: [ ] news on diabetes BTW, on a semi-related subject - hypoglycemia - i came to a tentativeconclusion on something i'dsuspected before. When i breakfast solely on beans - i mean around 400calories of cooked soybean -my sugar level seems to stay solid til i eat again, which may be around 8PM. On the other hand,if i include substantial more carbs in breakfast, like a sweetpotato, i seemto sense running low on gasby early afternoon. ( I have enuff experience with suffering with thischallenge, that i am very sensitiveto to indications and onset of plummeting sugar. ) What is interesting, tome anyway, is that my onebig meal, quite late at night, is quite large in carbs, yet it reallydoesn't bother me afterward or thenext day. What i mean is, i am less "sensitive" to carbohydrate, as the daygoes on. Part of thiseffect is mixed in with body being habituated to certain eating patterns - imean i think more insulinis released, or is somehow readied for release, at certain "learned" timesof day, the accustomedmealtimes.Hue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.