Guest guest Posted November 20, 2002 Report Share Posted November 20, 2002 Hi All, I thought you might like the below. I guess it more or less explains where CR stands in even those we would think care about it. Cheers, Al. On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:06:57 -0800, zod <scalzod@...> wrote: > I heard Lane present this data at symposium honoring 's >upcoming retirement. Slide after slide of the data showing the benefits of >CR (and the converse for the controls) in primates. > His session was just prior to a break. As soon as he finished, everyone >dove for the Donuts, Pastries and Coffee. > Damn funny. > > Hi Dave and all, I can understand this as funny as it sounds. I remember how I had for several years been reading anti-aging research and kept coming across cr studies, and the most powerful thing about it was that no one was selling it or making money on it which made it all the more creditable. However, even with this knowledge I merely accepted the conventional wisdom that it was undoable. It wasn't until I read Walford's original book on the subject that I considered doing it myself. Which is I think a testement to his greatness. He was willing to break out of the conventional wisdom and forge new ground, although Biosphere helped. I think most of those people at the conference you write about are the same in that as much as any rationale person would want the benefits of cr, as long as they were willing to put up with the few downsides, they are conventional and herdlike in their mentality to the point that they beleive it is undoable or very painful when in fact for many it isn't. In fact some on the list, including myself would say it greatly improves life quality. The more of us who succeed at cr there are the more that herdlike mentality will be broken down. but it will take time because of so many misconceptions and confusions. Regards, Mike Colella >On 11/18/02 6:21 PM, " Dean Pomerleau " <deanp@...> wrote: > ><SNIP> >> >> But probably justifiably, they aren't optimistic about the potential for >> many people to follow a CR diet. Instead they focus on the search for a >> CR-mimic, an intervention that will provide the health/lifespan benefits >> of CR without reducing in food: >> >> " Even if CR is eventually shown to retard human >> aging and to enhance the quality of life in later years, >> it is not likely that the strict dietary control needed >> would become a widespread practice. The popularity of >> fad diets, weight loss pills and programs in addition to >> the well-known difficulties in maintaining weight loss, >> argue against the likelihood of a large-scale application >> of a CR regimen among people. Thus, we have chosen >> to investigate the possible development of " CR mimetics " >> as an alternative to the strict diet regimen of CR. A >> CR mimetic can be loosely defined as any intervention >> that produces selected beneficial effects of CR on aging without causing >> or requiring a significant reduction in caloric intake. " >> >> --Dean >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> [1] Microsc. Res. Tech. 59: 335-338, 2002. >> >> Caloric Restriction and Aging in Primates: Relevance to >> Humans and Possible CR Mimetics >> >> MARK A. LANE,* JULIE MATTISON, DONALD K. INGRAM, AND GEORGE S. ROTH >> PMID: 12424798 > >------ >Your " Good Point! " response will go to 800+ people. Reply to the author instead. ------ Too much email? Change to the " Digest (HTML Format) " version at: http://lists.calorierestriction.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=crsociety & A;=1 Alan Pater, Ph.D.; Faculty of Medicine; Memorial University; St. 's, NL A1B 3V6 Canada; Tel. No.: (709) 777-6488; Fax No.: (709) 777-7010; email: apater@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.