Guest guest Posted May 2, 2003 Report Share Posted May 2, 2003 Hi All, WHO's diet report prompts food industry backlash. Behind the scenes events prompt interest. Cheers, Al. Alan Pater, Ph.D.; Faculty of Medicine; Memorial University; St. 's, NL A1B 3V6 Canada; Tel. No.: (709) 777-6488; Fax No.: (709) 777-7010; email: apater@... The Lancet 361, 1442 WHO's diet report prompts food industry backlash Haroon Ashraf New guidelines by WHO and the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) on nutrition and exercise, published on April 23, have provoked the US sugar industry to ask Congress to cut all funding for WHO unless it revises the new rules for healthy eating. WHO insiders, according to UK newspaper The Guardian, have called the Sugar Association's response akin to blackmail and worse then any reaction from the tobacco industry. The association, with a coalition of major food groups including Coca-Cola and Pepsico, have also written to US health secretary, Tommy , to request that he get the WHO report withdrawn. Furthermore, the coalition said that " if necessary we will promote and encourage new laws which will require future WHO funding to be provided only if the organisation accepts that all reports must be supported by the preponderance of science " . The association also wrote to Gro Harlem Brundtland, WHO's director general, and said that it will " exercise every avenue available to expose the dubious nature " of WHO's report including challenging its US$406 million annual funding from the US government. The FAO/WHO expert report on diet, nutrition and prevention of chronic diseases describes " the best currently available scientific evidence on the relationship of diet, nutrition, and physical activity to chronic diseases " , said WHO. In 2001, the rapidly growing burden of chronic disease contributed approximately 59% of the 56·5 million total reported deaths in the world and 46% of the global burden of disease. The study, compiled by 30 independent experts, recommends a fat intake of 15–30% of total daily energy intake; saturated fats at less than 10%; carbohydrates at 55–75%; but free sugars at below 10%. Daily intake of iodised salt, should be less than 5 g a day; protein intake should be 10–15%; while intake of fruit and vegetables should be at least 400 g. Finally the report recommends 1 h of moderate-intensity activity, such as walking, everyday to maintain a healthy bodyweight. The sugar industry claims that the 10% level on daily sugar consumption, is scientifically flawed and that a 2002 report by the Institute of Medicine shows that 25% of food and drink intake can be sugar based. WHO has strongly rejected this higher level, adding that its recommendation is in line with 23 national reports that all support a 10% sugar level. An analysis of the report's impact by JP , the international bank, considered that governments could no longer ignore the human and financial cost of chronic disease––obesity alone cost the US economy $117 billion in 2000––and will be forced to make policy changes. Brundtland said " food and related companies are a critical element in developing a long-term solution " . WHO will meet major food and beverage companies and consumer groups next month. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.