Guest guest Posted May 7, 2003 Report Share Posted May 7, 2003 Hi All, The below is PDF-available from: apater@... . ff's and fi's seem to be ?'s. Too much magnesium in drinking water seems to be inferior to an intermediate amount, so does that mean that too much magnesium supplement will do the same thing? Cheers, Al. European Journal of Epidemiology 18 :305 –309,2003. Cardiovascular mortality and calcium and magnesium in drinking water:An ecological study in elderly people Sebastien Marque,Hele`ne Jacqmin-Gadda, Jean-Francois Dartigues & Commenges Abstract.Background :Previous studies found rela- tions between cardiovascular mortality and minerals in drinking water,but the major works considered water hardness or neglected the di ?erences between adults and elderly.Drinking water is an important source of calcium in the elderly particularly because of increased needs and decreased consumption of dairy products.Methods :We collected informations about all deaths (14,311)occurring in 69 parishes of the South –West of France during 7 years (1990 – 1996).We obtained the causes of deaths from a spe- cial service of INSERM for each death,with age at death and sex.The exposure value was supplied by administrative source (DDASS)and by measurement surveys.We use an extra-Poisson variation model to Key words:Calcium,Cardiovascular mortality,Drinking take into account the heterogeneity of the population of these parishes.Results :A signi ?cant relationship was observed between calcium and cardiovascular mortality with a RR:0.90 for non-cerebrovascular causes and RR:0.86 for cerebrovascular (when cal- cium is higher than the second tercile:94 mg/l).We found a protective e ?ect of magnesium concentra- tions between 4 and 11 mg/l with a RR:0.92 for non- cerebrovascular and RR:0.77 for cerebrovascular mortality,as compared to concentrations lower than 4 mg/l.Conclusions :These ?ndings strongly suggest a potential protective dose-e ?ect relation between cal- cium in drinking water and cardiovascular causes. For magnesium,a U-shape e ?ect is possible,espe- cially for cerebrovascular mortality. Introduction Cardiovascular mortality represents the main cause of mortality in people over 65 years of age,with an incidence of 1.9 per 1000 person-years among men and 1.3 per 1000 among women [1 ]in 1990 in France. Previous epidemiologic studies have suggested an inverse relationship between the number of deaths by cardiovascular pathologies and water hardness [2 ], mainly determined by concentrations of calcium and magnesium. Calcium and magnesium are antagonistic enzy- matic activators.Calcium is essential to coagulation, nerve impulse and muscular contraction,in particular for the cardiac muscle.Magnesium is involved in the transfer and the release of energy and takes part in cardiac physiology.The results of epidemiologic studies have suggested a potential hypotensive action for calcium and an e ?ect against thrombosis for magnesium [3 –5 ]. In developed countries,dairy products represent the most signi ?cant source of calcium.However,it is recognized that the intestinal absorption of calcium decreases with aging [6 ],and particularly among women [7 ].Moreover,elderly are sometimes con- fronted with a problem of lactose intolerance;for these subjects drinking water becomes the major source of calcium [8,9 ].The daily intake of magne- sium in the developed countries is insu ?cient com- pared to recommended values [10 ].Moreover,since the magnesium in drinking water is in ionized form,it might be more bioavailable than that provided by solid foods [11,12 ].This may also be the case for calcium which seems to be at least as bioavailable in water as in milk [13 ]. The various studies about the role of calcium and magnesium have often shown a protective e ?ect of these two elements on cardiovascular mortality. However these works are essentially based on studies of correlations between the concentrations of these minerals in water and the death rates in the various geographical areas [14,15 ].Moreover,some of these studies have considered the hardness of water as a global factor rather than the separate e ?ect of calci- um and magnesium [16 ]. Recently,Rylander et al.[17 ]found that deaths by ischaemic cardiopathies were inversely associated with the concentrations of calcium and magnesium in drinking water.According to the same authors,cal- cium may have a protective e ?ect on cerebrovascular mortality in men.However,this relation was not found by Yang et al.[18,19 ]who suggested that magnesium in drinking water may have a protective e ?ect.This protective e ?ect of magnesium was also found in other studies on cardiovascular mortality [20 ].Nevertheless,some doubts persist regarding these possible relationships because of contradictory [21 ]or non-signi ?cant [22,23 ]results.Finally,the relationship between cardiovascular mortality and the mineral elements of drinking water has rarely been studied in elderly [24 ]. The major aim of this study was to assess the re- lationship between cardiovascular mortality in the elderly and the concentration of calcium and mag- nesium in drinking water.In e ?ect,the few number of studies among elderly encourage us to investigate more precisely this relationship [6,7 ].The study was based on the population of the 75 parishes from which the PAQUID sample was drawn.We have also studied separately cerebrovascular and other cardio- vascular mortality.The water distribution network had already been studied for these parishes and mean concentrations of calcium and magnesium were al- ready available.Deaths certi ?cates were collected for a 7-years period and the analysis beared on 14,331 deaths and 777,493 persons-years............. Results When we considered global cardiovascular mortality (See Table 1),we observed a protective e ?ect of higher calcium concentration (RR:0.90 –Con ?dence Interval of 95%(CI95)[0.84;0.96 ]–for concentra- tion >94 mg/l).We also found a protective e ?ect of magnesium between 4 and 11 mg/l with estimated relative risk between 0.88 and 0.92 (respectively among women and men with ,CI95 [0.81;0.96 ]and, CI95 [0.84;1.00 ]). We then analysed separately non-cerebrovascular (cardiovascular)mortality (10,492 deaths)and cere- brovascular mortality (3819 deaths).Table 2 shows the results of the extra-variation Poisson models for cardiovascular mortality,excluding cerebrovascular origin.These models suggested a protective e ?ect of a high concentration of calcium on cardiovascular mortality with a dose –response e ?ect.This e ?ect seemed to be similar in both sexes,with a signi ?cant relative risk in the parishes having a water with a content higher than 94 mg/l (RR:0.90,CI95 [0.84; 0.97 ]).Concentration of magnesium between 4 and 11 mg/l seemed to be slightly protective on cardio- vascular mortality (RR:0.92,CI95 [0.86;0.99 ]). Table 3 shows the results of the extra-variation Poisson models for cerebrovascular mortality.About calcium,we found roughly similar results on cere- brovascular mortality than on cardiovascular mor- tality.We observed a protective relationship for concentration >94 mg/l.This e ?ect seemed slightly clearer among women (RR:0.84 vs.0.89,with CI95 respectively [0.74;0.97 ]and [0.74;1.07 ]).However, we observed a more signi ?cant protective e ?ect for magnesium for concentration between 4 and 11 mg/l. This e ?ect seemed similar on both sexes and highly signi ?cant (RR:0.77,p O :001). The rural status of parishes did not seem to be associated with cardiovascular mortality,and we found this result in all models we performed. Discussion These ?ndings suggest a protective e ?ect of calcium in drinking water with a dose-e ?ect relationship.This e ?ect is similar in both sexes with a RR:0.90 in cardiovascular mortality and RR:0.86 in cerebro- vascular mortality. Magnesium seems to be protective on cardiovas- cular mortality for concentrations between 4 and 11 mg/l (RR:0.90).The e ?ect of magnesium seems to be higher on cerebrovascular mortality (RR:0.77). Considering two di ?erent causes in CV mortality among the elderly was the major originality of this analysis.Few analysis were performed among this population and all of them considered only cardio- vascular cause,without distinction between the sub- causes.Furthermore,we could estimate independently Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.