Guest guest Posted August 10, 2003 Report Share Posted August 10, 2003 I apologize in advance for perseverating on the issue of soy neurotoxicity. I've now (finally) read the article a couple times, and I just had a " duh " experience unexpectedly. Given that we're all posting to the " CALORIC RESTRICTION " support group, I feel dumb that I hadn't thought about calorie intake in the study! (hence, the self-directed " Duh " ). It stands to reason that those who ate more servings of tofu, were also those who at more servings of food generally, and who took in more total calories. I don't see any indication in the study (reading the " dietary assessments " section very carefully) of measures of calorie intake being reported. Furthermore, when they list covariates that they controlled the effects of, they never mentioned caloric intake as a covariate. My first concern, that the " tofu effect " was too small to worry about was substantiated: there was a very small effect size uniquely associated with greater tofu intake (.8 of one percent of the variability in dementia (pg. 251)). Furthermore, and more importantly to us, CR science would anticipate greater overall intake of food to be the cause of the effect seen in the study. Actually, I would have expected a larger effect if greater tofu intake was associated with greater caloric intake. Please let me know if I missed something in the study that you picked up on. More eyes and memories are certainly an improvement over mine alone. R. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.