Guest guest Posted August 19, 2003 Report Share Posted August 19, 2003 IMHO, since you're only on ON and not CRON, eat all the fruit you want. Someday when you decide to do full-fledged CRON, don't eat as much fruit. It's not that low in calories at all. And contains lots of fruit sugar (fructose). Veggies are much lower in calories (in general). I would not suggest adding butter to your diet. There is a good butter substitute called Spectrum Spread full of omega 3's. Buy it at just about any health foods store. A good way to add lots of fruit to your diet w/o too many calories is to eat a cup of fruit salad (mix 4-6 small amts of diff fruits) daily - but keep it to a cup or so if you want to do the CR of CRON. Another " fruit " treat is sugar free ice pops (available in most supermarkets) - 5 cal per pop - fruit flavors. on 8/19/2003 5:25 PM, paultheo2000 at paultheo2000@... wrote: > I'm really curious about the fruit intake amongst the cronies here. > > Before I had ever heard of CR I didn't eat any fruit (all I ate was > white bread and candy), then I started with 2 fruits a day which grew > to 3-5 a day. Now that I've made an effort to cut my grains to 0-2 > portions a day I've found myself snacking on fruit ALL the time. It's > become the bottom of my food pyramid, tied with vegetables. I'd say I > eat about 8-9 fruits daily. I'm curious if it's just a phase or if > more people eat this way. I don't think it's particularly bad since > it's low cal, plenty of nutrients and fiber but I do find it somewhat > odd. If my palate could adjust I'd probably replace some of it with > quality butter, liver, etc. > > Any thoughts? > > Cheers, > > - > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2003 Report Share Posted August 19, 2003 Hi , It occurred to me you might benefit from the latest Dietary Reference Intakes: http://books.nap.edu/books/0309085373/html/536.html#pagetop the usda food composition database http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/Data/index.html a Princeton db: http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~ah/food/ and dr dukes db: http://www.ars-grin.gov/duke/index.html regards. ----- Original Message ----- From: paultheo2000 Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 4:25 PM Subject: [ ] How many fruits do you guys eat daily? I'm really curious about the fruit intake amongst the cronies here. :)Before I had ever heard of CR I didn't eat any fruit (all I ate waswhite bread and candy), then I started with 2 fruits a day which grewto 3-5 a day. Now that I've made an effort to cut my grains to 0-2portions a day I've found myself snacking on fruit ALL the time. It'sbecome the bottom of my food pyramid, tied with vegetables. I'd say Ieat about 8-9 fruits daily. I'm curious if it's just a phase or ifmore people eat this way. I don't think it's particularly bad sinceit's low cal, plenty of nutrients and fiber but I do find it somewhatodd. If my palate could adjust I'd probably replace some of it withquality butter, liver, etc. Any thoughts?Cheers, - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2003 Report Share Posted August 20, 2003 Well, most fruits are fairly low in calories. Maybe not for the Cronie, but for the average person. I can consume 4 portions of fruit for the caloric price of a Mars bar which is way less filling! You're right about the sugar, but I suspect the insulin spike is somewhat mitigated due to the fiber and other nutrients in the fruit. You're right though: vegetables are a theoretically more nutritious alternative. When I sit down to eat about 50% of the volume I eat comes from veggies. About the butter, I'm definitely going to incorporate some and probably more if I can get it from a local farmer. I don't know what Spectrum Spread is, I'd have to look into it. My suspicion is that it's either with trans fat, vegetable oil (canola or soy, probably), artificial products and a great deal of chemical tinkering. If it's made from flax oil (omega 3) then it may very likely be rancid. I have the same concern about sugar-free popsicles. I'm trying to cut out all artificial sweeteners as I read more about their potential impacts. Not too mention that 'sugar free' products usually give my cravings for more food...even in guar puddings. I stick to minimal amounts of raw honey, maple sugar, molasses and stevia. - > > > I'm really curious about the fruit intake amongst the cronies here. > > > > Before I had ever heard of CR I didn't eat any fruit (all I ate was > > white bread and candy), then I started with 2 fruits a day which grew > > to 3-5 a day. Now that I've made an effort to cut my grains to 0-2 > > portions a day I've found myself snacking on fruit ALL the time. It's > > become the bottom of my food pyramid, tied with vegetables. I'd say I > > eat about 8-9 fruits daily. I'm curious if it's just a phase or if > > more people eat this way. I don't think it's particularly bad since > > it's low cal, plenty of nutrients and fiber but I do find it somewhat > > odd. If my palate could adjust I'd probably replace some of it with > > quality butter, liver, etc. > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > Cheers, > > > > - > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2003 Report Share Posted August 20, 2003 Well, I don't use much butter currently, but I plan to incorporate a lot more. The more I read about the impact of natural sources of vitamins and A and D the more important I realize saturated fats are in a healthy diet. Well, liver is one of the healthiest foods on the planet. Even conservative sites like 'The world's healthiest foods' advocate it in spite of it's 'bad' saturated fats. People have eaten raw liver for centuries.... the internal organs of animals were prized for their nutritious value. My fat intake, as it stands is something like this: extra virgin olive oil, coconut oil, coconut/coconut milk, flax oil/flax meal, butter, avocadoes. I have plenty of nuts. All kinds-pine nuts, brazil nuts, macadamias, peanuts (I know, a legume), walnuts, almonds, pecans, hazelnuts, pumpkin seeds, sunflower seeds, cashews. I love nut butters although I use them in moderation. I'm currently avoiding all soy products, or at least consuming them very tentatively... I'm moving towards replacing soy with milk, butter, cream, coconut and other fats My BW is ~133 pounds, I consume about 80 grams of protein a day. I think I'm going to cut out the whey protein powder though---I'm trying to move away from processed and chemically manipulated foods. I already thought of hard boiled eggs and raw vegetables. V8 is also convenient. I do have some grains (I love pumpernickel) on occasion. Cheers! - > , I'll play devil's advocate with Francesca's advice and suggest that you could add a very SMALL amount of butter to your diet. Since a number of nutrition scholars feel it's a safe and healthy addition to the diet, it just might be a good thing to add, especially since you are not yet restricting calories (restraining them, maybe!) Don't make it the staple of your diet, by any means. > > Liver is probably a bad idea. Just think of the liver's function in the body and you'll guess why. I know, I know, there's always somebody to dispute any line of reasoning, but all kinds of serious crap goes through a liver. No thanks. I can't suspend my imagination long enough to get liver down. > > What are you eating for your polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fats? Are you having some avocado? That'd be a good one for you. Are you having some nuts? If I could afford the calories, I'd probably use more " nut butters " like almond butter, or even peanut butter. Can you get soybean butter? That's my favorite. > > How many grams of protein are you eating everyday, and what's your body weight now? > > It's easy to eat a lot of fruit because it tastes good and it's CONVENIENT. If you're concerned about eating too much of it, the answer might be to make some other foods equally convenient by preparing things in advance and putting them in ziplock bags. For instance, you might keep hard-boiled eggs in the fridge, precooked chunks of chicken meat, and ready-to-eat raw vegetables. > > Also, you said you weren't doing grains, but how about sprouted grain breads that contain no flour, such as Ezekial bread? I do popcorn sometimes, too. > > Suz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2003 Report Share Posted August 20, 2003 There are many snacks lower in calories than 3-5 pieces of fruit a day. But if you're saying there are worse things to eat than fruit, you certainly didn't get any argument from me there. Did anyone say anything about candy bars here??? Spectrum Spread is dairy free, non-hydrogenated, trans fat free spread. Another healthier alternative to butter might be garlic-tinged olive oil to dip in - something Walford likes and recommends in his book. Since you haven't read Walford's BT120YD, why don't you try suspending judgement until you do ? You certainly sound like you have your mind made up about things; nutrition is an evolving science and nobody has all the answers yet as we note in our message to newcomers. on 8/19/2003 8:40 PM, paultheo2000 at paultheo2000@... wrote: > Well, most fruits are fairly low in calories. Maybe not for the > Cronie, but for the average person. I can consume 4 portions of fruit > for the caloric price of a Mars bar which is way less filling! > > About the butter, I'm definitely going to incorporate some and > probably more if I can get it from a local farmer. I don't know what > Spectrum Spread is, I'd have to look into it. My suspicion is that > it's either with trans fat, vegetable oil (canola or soy, probably), > artificial products and a great deal of chemical tinkering. If it's > made from flax oil (omega 3) then it may very likely be rancid. I have > the same concern about sugar-free popsicles. I'm trying to cut out all > artificial sweeteners as I read more about their potential impacts. > Not too mention that 'sugar free' products usually give my cravings > for more food...even in guar puddings. I stick to minimal amounts of > raw honey, maple sugar, molasses and stevia. > > - > > >> >>> I'm really curious about the fruit intake amongst the cronies here. >>> >>> Before I had ever heard of CR I didn't eat any fruit (all I ate was >>> white bread and candy), then I started with 2 fruits a day which grew >>> to 3-5 a day. Now that I've made an effort to cut my grains to 0-2 >>> portions a day I've found myself snacking on fruit ALL the time. It's >>> become the bottom of my food pyramid, tied with vegetables. I'd say I >>> eat about 8-9 fruits daily. I'm curious if it's just a phase or if >>> more people eat this way. I don't think it's particularly bad since >>> it's low cal, plenty of nutrients and fiber but I do find it somewhat >>> odd. If my palate could adjust I'd probably replace some of it with >>> quality butter, liver, etc. >>> >>> Any thoughts? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2003 Report Share Posted August 20, 2003 I can't think of any snacks lower in calories and as filling as fruit (that aren't synthetic). There are vegetables such as carrots and fennel which are also good snacks. I only mentioned candy bars in relation to the average person...I'm aware that nobody here eats them Well, since I don't have access to Walford's books I must make a temporary decision in the meanwhile based on what I've analyzed so far. Of course, I shall read the book (it's on my lengthy book list) and perhaps re-evaluate then. BTW, you also seem to have made up your mind. Should you not postpone judgement until having read Enig, Fallon, Ravnskov? It seems that you don't follow the very advice you give me. (My apologies if you have read them) Cheers, - > Spectrum Spread is dairy free, non-hydrogenated, trans fat free spread. > Another healthier alternative to butter might be garlic-tinged olive oil to > dip in - something Walford likes and recommends in his book. > > Since you haven't read Walford's BT120YD, why don't you try suspending > judgement until you do ? You certainly sound like you have your mind made > up about things; nutrition is an evolving science and nobody has all the > answers yet as we note in our message to newcomers. > > on 8/19/2003 8:40 PM, paultheo2000 at paultheo2000@y... wrote: > > > Well, most fruits are fairly low in calories. Maybe not for the > > Cronie, but for the average person. I can consume 4 portions of fruit > > for the caloric price of a Mars bar which is way less filling! > > > > About the butter, I'm definitely going to incorporate some and > > probably more if I can get it from a local farmer. I don't know what > > Spectrum Spread is, I'd have to look into it. My suspicion is that > > it's either with trans fat, vegetable oil (canola or soy, probably), > > artificial products and a great deal of chemical tinkering. If it's > > made from flax oil (omega 3) then it may very likely be rancid. I have > > the same concern about sugar-free popsicles. I'm trying to cut out all > > artificial sweeteners as I read more about their potential impacts. > > Not too mention that 'sugar free' products usually give my cravings > > for more food...even in guar puddings. I stick to minimal amounts of > > raw honey, maple sugar, molasses and stevia. > > > > - > > > > > >> > >>> I'm really curious about the fruit intake amongst the cronies here. > >>> > >>> Before I had ever heard of CR I didn't eat any fruit (all I ate was > >>> white bread and candy), then I started with 2 fruits a day which grew > >>> to 3-5 a day. Now that I've made an effort to cut my grains to 0-2 > >>> portions a day I've found myself snacking on fruit ALL the time. It's > >>> become the bottom of my food pyramid, tied with vegetables. I'd say I > >>> eat about 8-9 fruits daily. I'm curious if it's just a phase or if > >>> more people eat this way. I don't think it's particularly bad since > >>> it's low cal, plenty of nutrients and fiber but I do find it somewhat > >>> odd. If my palate could adjust I'd probably replace some of it with > >>> quality butter, liver, etc. > >>> > >>> Any thoughts? > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> > >>> - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2003 Report Share Posted August 20, 2003 > I'm really curious about the fruit intake amongst the cronies here. Hi , I eat almost no sweet fruits because of CR. just no calories to spare, and I'd rather gets fats, greens, etc. i do make exceptions seasonally, though, buying fresh lychees in the summer and picking fresh wild berries from my backyard in season (very short window of opportunity for the three or four types). i also eat non-sweet fruits in season from local sources, especially peppers, but also some tomatoes, cucumbers, etc. if i didn't do CR I'd eat much more fruit. i do have the rare treat of mango, papaya, peach, pear, etc. mike parker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2003 Report Share Posted August 20, 2003 I eat a fair amount of fruit, but lately, much less than I previously did. I now eat predominantly tomatoes, peppers, and berries. Formerly I also ate alot of bananas, apples, cantelope, and grapes as well. >From: " paultheo2000 " <paultheo2000@...> >Reply- > >Subject: [ ] How many fruits do you guys eat daily? >Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 21:25:01 -0000 > >I'm really curious about the fruit intake amongst the cronies here. > >Before I had ever heard of CR I didn't eat any fruit (all I ate was >white bread and candy), then I started with 2 fruits a day which grew >to 3-5 a day. Now that I've made an effort to cut my grains to 0-2 >portions a day I've found myself snacking on fruit ALL the time. It's >become the bottom of my food pyramid, tied with vegetables. I'd say I >eat about 8-9 fruits daily. I'm curious if it's just a phase or if >more people eat this way. I don't think it's particularly bad since >it's low cal, plenty of nutrients and fiber but I do find it somewhat >odd. If my palate could adjust I'd probably replace some of it with >quality butter, liver, etc. > >Any thoughts? > >Cheers, > >- > _________________________________________________________________ <b>Get MSN 8</b> and help protect your children with advanced parental controls. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2003 Report Share Posted August 20, 2003 I have lived on all-fruit diet for a couple months, this years ago, after reading some non scientific mystico propaganda. ( I'm sure that toxic nonsense is still out there, beckoning other morons.) For someone with a tendency to hypoglycemia, as i am, this diet was, predictably, suicidal. ( But i do note that the glycemic effects of fruits do not quite accord with the published rankings... strange...) You can pack away a lot of fruit, but whether you are overly sensitive to sugar or not, the sugary flavor will just get to be too much. I like to feel well sugar level regulated, and this means better able to cope with long periods between eating, and i am now able to better recognize the difference in myself between hunger and sugar-hunger now, so i have been moving away from fruit as a low cal snack - or meal postponer. In warm weather i put away a lot of brocco-slaw now, instead of fruit; it has a very low calorie count per volume and good stuff in it. Actually, i am sure using it raw like this, actually yields less calories than stated on the package; i would not be surprised if only 50% of the rated approx 150 cal./ lb are absorbed. The only drawback to this food is its price; i think it's overpriced at around $3 / lb. I can easily, easily put away 3 lb. while reading the newspaper. Hue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2003 Report Share Posted August 20, 2003 One of the best approved diets rec's veggies and fruits. The "perfect" cron diet would be romaine lettuce. At 600 kcals, you get almost all the nutrients you need (so add a MV for selenium, and magnesium), but you have to add energy - that's sugar or fats. Assuming you need 1800 kcal, you'd need to add 1200 - about 12 oz sugar or 4 oz fat. mix those you get a cookie or a french fry. fruits supply energy as well as vitamins and fiber. regards. ----- Original Message ----- From: paultheo2000 Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 7:40 PM Subject: [ ] Re: How many fruits do you guys eat daily? Well, most fruits are fairly low in calories. Maybe not for theCronie, but for the average person. I can consume 4 portions of fruitfor the caloric price of a Mars bar which is way less filling! You'reright about the sugar, but I suspect the insulin spike is somewhatmitigated due to the fiber and other nutrients in the fruit. You'reright though: vegetables are a theoretically more nutritiousalternative. When I sit down to eat about 50% of the volume I eatcomes from veggies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2003 Report Share Posted August 20, 2003 There are diff views on CRON, some eat a high fat diet, some low fat. The medically approved diets are low fat (ornish, DASH). low fat is <30%. Ornish is <20% - not easy to do. ----- Original Message ----- From: paultheo2000 Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 8:10 PM Subject: [ ] Re: How many fruits do you guys eat daily? I can't think of any snacks lower in calories and as filling as fruit(that aren't synthetic). There are vegetables such as carrots andfennel which are also good snacks. I only mentioned candy bars inrelation to the average person...I'm aware that nobody here eats them :)Well, since I don't have access to Walford's books I must make atemporary decision in the meanwhile based on what I've analyzed sofar. Of course, I shall read the book (it's on my lengthy book list)and perhaps re-evaluate then. BTW, you also seem to have made up yourmind. Should you not postpone judgement until having read Enig,Fallon, Ravnskov? It seems that you don't follow the very advice yougive me. (My apologies if you have read them)Cheers, - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2003 Report Share Posted August 20, 2003 Hey , You mention Stevia as an alternative sweetener. I use it fairly regularly, especially when it's hot in the summer. It seems to be quite safe, though there is an insulin reaction like with sugar (some hypothesize it's related to the sensation of tasting sweetness, rather than any actual digestive process), but these seems common to all sweeteners, regardless of calorie load. I actually find I use it less and less each year, as sweets just don't pose as much of a temptation, but I don't think there's any specific reason to limit stevia if you enjoy it and especially not if it helps you to avoid the temptations of other things. Cheers, ps: I eat a spectrum of fruits and veggies every day, but most usually berries and sometimes melons. About 5 years ago Sherman (anyone know if he's still around on the other list???) created a nutritionally complete fruit salad recipe that also works great as a breakfast shake (good fat content & provided 60% of virtually all RDAs for a caloric load of 400) -- had that pretty much every day for a few years, though I find myself grabbing fruit smoothies from a local store more often lately (hectic schedule). > -----Original Message----- > From: paultheo2000 [mailto:paultheo2000@...] > Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 6:41 PM > > Subject: [ ] Re: How many fruits do you guys eat daily? > > > Well, most fruits are fairly low in calories. Maybe not for the > Cronie, but for the average person. I can consume 4 portions of fruit > for the caloric price of a Mars bar which is way less filling! You're > right about the sugar, but I suspect the insulin spike is somewhat > mitigated due to the fiber and other nutrients in the fruit. You're > right though: vegetables are a theoretically more nutritious > alternative. When I sit down to eat about 50% of the volume I eat > comes from veggies. > > About the butter, I'm definitely going to incorporate some and > probably more if I can get it from a local farmer. I don't know what > Spectrum Spread is, I'd have to look into it. My suspicion is that > it's either with trans fat, vegetable oil (canola or soy, probably), > artificial products and a great deal of chemical tinkering. If it's > made from flax oil (omega 3) then it may very likely be rancid. I have > the same concern about sugar-free popsicles. I'm trying to cut out all > artificial sweeteners as I read more about their potential impacts. > Not too mention that 'sugar free' products usually give my cravings > for more food...even in guar puddings. I stick to minimal amounts of > raw honey, maple sugar, molasses and stevia. > > - > > > > > > > I'm really curious about the fruit intake amongst the cronies here. > > > > > > Before I had ever heard of CR I didn't eat any fruit (all I ate was > > > white bread and candy), then I started with 2 fruits a day which grew > > > to 3-5 a day. Now that I've made an effort to cut my grains to 0-2 > > > portions a day I've found myself snacking on fruit ALL the time. It's > > > become the bottom of my food pyramid, tied with vegetables. I'd say I > > > eat about 8-9 fruits daily. I'm curious if it's just a phase or if > > > more people eat this way. I don't think it's particularly bad since > > > it's low cal, plenty of nutrients and fiber but I do find it somewhat > > > odd. If my palate could adjust I'd probably replace some of it with > > > quality butter, liver, etc. > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2003 Report Share Posted August 20, 2003 --- In , " jwwright " <jwwright@e...> wrote: > There are diff views on CRON, some eat a high fat diet, some low > fat. The medically approved diets are low fat (ornish, DASH). low > fat is <30%. Ornish is <20% - not easy to do. *****I believe Ornish is, in fact, < = 10%, and yes, that is VERY hard to do. That's one of the reasons why so many go " off the wagon " after a few months on Ornish (and Pritikin). The better strategy is to junk all the junk foods, refined and overly- processed " staples " of modern society, as well as fatty, artery- clogging " bad " fats long before these critters wreck havoc on the cardiovascular system and require strict adherence to an Ornish-like diet. (As was mentioned here a few days ago, Ornish does not advocate his *extreme* diet for those w/o cardiovascular disease...the diet he recommends is MUCH less strict for those who are in good, sound health. His landmark diet, for which he made headlines, is aimed at those who are in serious cardiovascular health and need immediate intervention, whether it is from pharmaceuticals, the surgeon's knife, or a radically different diet.) ~andy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2003 Report Share Posted August 20, 2003 --- In , " Gifford " <gifford@u...> wrote: Hello . > You mention Stevia as an alternative sweetener. I use it fairly > regularly, especially when it's hot in the summer. It seems to be > quite safe, though there is an insulin reaction like with sugar > (some hypothesize it's related to the sensation of tasting > sweetness, rather than any actual digestive process), but these > seems common to all sweeteners, regardless of calorie load. *****Yes, I've heard of this " oral " reaction to sweetners too. To date, however, I have not read any credible scientific studies that definitely show the link. (Oh, I hear Dr.s and " extremists " say " it raises the blood sugar! " but when I ask them for some kind of scientific validation, they stutter and say, " Oh there are *plenty* of studies! " Really? Show me!! If non-caloric sweeteners such as sucrulose, stevia, and even aspartame!, produce insulin reactions, how is it that the National Institutde of Diabetes recommends " moderate " use of such non-caloric sweeteners? From one of their 2003 Fact Sheets comes the following: " There are two main categories of artificial sweeteners: (1) Non-nutritive. These contain NO calories and *do not affect the blood glucose levels* [emphasis added]...Splenda, Saccharin, Aspartame; (2) Nutritive. These contain calories and have varying effect on the blood glucose levels...Sorbitol, Manitol, Xylitol, Maltodextrin. " As well, the highly-regarded Mayo Clinic (recently listed by " US News & World Report " as the Number Two overall hospital in the US, and the number one hospital in diabetes research), had this to say about the effects of artificial sweeteners on blood sugar: " No studies have proved negative effects of artificial sweeteners on diabetes. Artificial sweeteners are calorie-free. They make foods taste sweeter. But they don't raise blood sugar levels. They don't count as a carbohydrate, a fat or any other exchange. Most beverages and some hard candies that contain artificial sweeteners have almost no calories. So you can drink or eat them as often as you like. But keep in mind that some foods containing artificial sweeteners, such as sugar-free yogurt, also contain calories and can affect your blood sugar level. In addition, some foods labeled sugar-free, such as sugar-free cookies and chocolates, may contain sweeteners such as sorbitol or mannitol that contain calories and can affect your blood sugar level. The American Diabetes Association approves the use of three artificial sweeteners in moderation. These include: Saccharin (Sprinkle Sweet, Sweet-10, Sugar Twin, Sweet'n Low) Aspartame (NutraSweet, Equal) Acesulfame potassium (Sweet One). " Does anyone have alternative, CREDIBLE scientific *facts* that dispute the effects of artifical sweeteners on the blood chemistry? (E.g., drink two 8-oz glasses of H20 sweetened with splenda (or stevia) ... we KNOW water does not spike an insulin reaction due to a glucose response...would the artificially sweetened H20 cause a spike? If so, it must be a reaction to the artificial sweetener since no other food components factor into this experiment. I am more interested in general findings: I'm sure one can find " a " study in which 1 out of 1000 people experienced a " positive response. " Personally, I don't find that result of much concern. With a 0.001 response, although it may be perfectly " valid, " one can also conclude that other " factors " [esp. psychological] came into play.) > I actually find I use it less and less each year, as sweets just > don't pose as much of a temptation, but I don't think there's any > specific reason to limit stevia if you enjoy it and especially not > if it helps you to avoid the temptations of other things. *****Likewise here. I have been on my " modified CRON " diet now for about three months, losing about 1 lb of bodyfat per week, effortlessly!! (yeah!!), basically by eating mainly UNrefined foods and thus very, very little sweetened products (except for naturally sweetened, such as fruit or the natural sugars occuring in milk products). As a result my desire/craving for sweetened products has diminished greatly (ex: I find green tea, whether 'flavored' as in " lime " or just 'pure plain' to be highly palatable w/o any sweeteners added). Why the change in my " attitude " ? The " script " out of which I viewed food for 48 years has been re-written. My " wiring " has changed. As Walford said in both editions of his book (120YD), " If you are currently on the typical Western-stule American diet, you do have to change your attitude towards, and your built-in social programming about, food. But you didn't write your own attitudes or programs anyway. They have been written into you by the experiences of childhood and a lifelong daily barrage of slick advetising, which tried to make you believe you are somehow deprived if you are not eating junk food, or that it's deliciously decadent and chic to be dining on the precursors of arteriosclerotic plaques. " ~ andy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2003 Report Share Posted August 20, 2003 Yes, the reversal diet was originally <10% fat. Now he says <10% sat fat, but as you say quite impossible to do. If I eat just avocado, I go over 20%. Also he's accepted fish (I haven't). I don't have heart disease but it seems to me that if the diet is good for CHD, it should be good BEFORE we get CHD. A preferable diet might be DASH. ornish.com is now webmd.com and the following article: http://my.webmd.com/content/article/46/2731_1679.htm?lastselectedguid={5FE84E90-BC77-4056-A91C-9531713CA348} Talks about <30%. very doable. I agree we should avoid all processed foods. If they don't have too much fat, corn syrup, sodium, and other additives. I was wondering the other day why wheat is so altered. Rice I can buy and cook, but I can't buy wheat kernels. Just recently we got King Arthur ground wheat kernels to use for flour. My wife makes banana bread (easier than yeasted bread). It's dark brown like pumpernickel. Why did we get the idea that white bread was better? why did Kellogg's, etc decide to process corn, wheat kernels and oats into other food when we can eat them as they are? And a lot more cheaply, I might add. When you compare the price of wheat (maybe 10$ per 100#) to an adulterated product at 1.5$ per loaf or 2.99 per 14 oz box of crackers, I'm really amazed. Regards. ----- Original Message ----- From: Andy Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 9:26 AM Subject: [ ] Re: How many fruits do you guys eat daily? > There are diff views on CRON, some eat a high fat diet, some low > fat. The medically approved diets are low fat (ornish, DASH). low > fat is <30%. Ornish is <20% - not easy to do. *****I believe Ornish is, in fact, < = 10%, and yes, that is VERY hard to do. That's one of the reasons why so many go "off the wagon" after a few months on Ornish (and Pritikin).The better strategy is to junk all the junk foods, refined and overly-processed "staples" of modern society, as well as fatty, artery-clogging "bad" fats long before these critters wreck havoc on the cardiovascular system and require strict adherence to an Ornish-like diet. (As was mentioned here a few days ago, Ornish does not advocate his *extreme* diet for those w/o cardiovascular disease...the diet he recommends is MUCH less strict for those who are in good, sound health. His landmark diet, for which he made headlines, is aimed at those who are in serious cardiovascular health and need immediate intervention, whether it is from pharmaceuticals, the surgeon's knife, or a radically different diet.)~andy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2003 Report Share Posted August 20, 2003 --- In , " jwwright " <jwwright@e...> wrote: Yes, the reversal diet was originally <10% fat. Now he says <10% sat fat, but as you say quite impossible to do. If I eat just avocado, I go over 20%. Also he's accepted fish (I haven't). I don't have heart disease but it seems to me that if the diet is good for CHD, it should be good BEFORE we get CHD. A preferable diet might be DASH. ornish.com is now webmd.com and the following article: http://my.webmd.com/content/article/46/2731_1679.htm?lastselectedguid= {5FE84E90-BC77-4056-A91C-9531713CA348} Talks about <30%. very doable. *****Thanks for the info. I agree we should avoid all processed foods. If they don't have too much fat, corn syrup, sodium, and other additives. I was wondering the other day why wheat is so altered. Rice I can buy and cook, but I can't buy wheat kernels. *****Well, you CAN buy the nearest thing, pretty much unprocessed wheat. Part of my daily breakfast cereal is 100% organic whole grain wheat (very similar to wheat berries which I used to eat, but no longer seem to be able to find). This wheat product is a " whole " grain, with the outer shell intact. Because of that, it requires soaking overnight and then a 40-50 min. simmering on the stove. After soaking 1 cup of the whole wheat overnight I add to the mix a cup of whole oat groats (they don't require the soaking), cook the batch for appox. 50 min. over a low flame, cool, and put in the fridge. It lasts just fine for 6-7 days and, once prepared, is as easy to make as commercial cereal (just scoop out, mix with whatever...bran, flax seed, fruit, protein powder), and eat! This mixture, whole wheat and oats, requires substantial chewing and thus takes longer than normal cereals (including slow-cooked oatmeal) to consume. That is one of its pleasures! Slow-eating = better signals to the body that the satiation point has been reached = less chance of over-eating AND since this cereal is high in fiber and unrefined, it digests very slowly with a very low glycemic index (even with added fruit!! and milk, regular organic or soy). The brand I buy is made by Arrowhead Mills and you can find them at many health food stores (not the big chains like GNC though) as well as on the web. Bon appetit! Why did we get the idea that white bread was better? *****Blame it on " Madison Avenue. " :-))) why did Kellogg's, etc decide to process corn, wheat kernels and oats into other food when we can eat them as they are? And a lot more cheaply, I might add. *****I suspect the bottom line was that it was more profitable to the company(s). Without being too cynical, the understanding is that this is usually the primary reason why ANYTHING is done in most large corporations/business; the change is " good for business. " Business and companies are " in business " to create a profit, the more the merrier! As to whether the consumers will genuinely benefit...well, there is the old adage: Caveat Emptor! ~ andy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.