Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Nourishing Traditions

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

----- Original Message -----

From: " dolores desideri " <ddesideri@...>

< >

Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 9:21 AM

Subject: Nourishing Traditions

> I've been waiting two months for Borders to order in Nourishing Traditions

> and they now tell me they are unable to get the book. Does anyone know

where

> I can get the book? dolores

http://www.4radiantlife.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>

> ----- Original Message -----

> From: " dolores desideri " <ddesideri@e...>

> < @y...>

> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 9:21 AM

> Subject: Nourishing Traditions

>

>

> > I've been waiting two months for Borders to order in Nourishing

Traditions

> > and they now tell me they are unable to get the book. Does anyone

know

> where

> > I can get the book? dolores

>

> http://www.4radiantlife.com

Another choice also in California (San Diego)

http://www.price-pottenger.org/books.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

> ... A calorie is a calorie, although there is some suggestion

> that a high fibre content can reduce the amount that some foods are

> digested, and hence how much energy you actually get from them...... Bottom

line, eat 5000

calories of broccoli a day and you'll gain weight, eat

> 1800 calories a day of butter & you'll lose weight...

This is not a good example. There are some foods you can

realistically, eat ad lib and you will NOT gain weight. Why

don't you try eating a diet of 5000 calories of broccoli a day?

It is practically impossible. Satiety effects and even purely

physical limitations apply. Same for an all-fruit diet: you will

lose substantial weight, even with 10+ bananas a day. ( I have

tried the fruit diet for a month or 2, many years ago, much

foolishness, but you will be losing weight, i assure you.....)

In thinking about calories, you have to consider the calorie

density of the foods, and the availability of the calories. This

is why the raw-foods people so often get into trouble; many

of those by-the-book calories are simply flushed right thru

the body and out.

Hue

> > 4.) You won't absorb any minerals/vitamins without

> > sufficient fat present!

>

> This is a fallacy ( " any " ). You won't get *fat-soluble* vitamins absorbed as

> much, and that's the limit of the problem. Most minerals are absorbed

> better on an empty stomach. Vit C is water soluble and you need no fat to

> absorb it, etc.

Are you sure this is quite the fallacy? In reading accounts of

hunting people living in the far north, i read that on a diet of

certain kinds of low fat meat ( rabbit for example) even with

UNLIMITED supply of such meat, the hunters would starve to

death without some source of fat from fat meat, for example

from an elk. The fat was regarded as precious! Of course,

this is an extreme climate, and the fat is very protective, but

the fact is, without this extra fat, starvation and death, even

with unlimited supply of other protein.

Hue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Hue,

> > ... Bottom line, eat 5000

> > calories of broccoli a day and you'll gain weight, eat

> > 1800 calories a day of butter & you'll lose weight...

>

> This is not a good example.

You're right. I was responding to a silly assertion with a silly example.

One cannot realistically claim to 'lose calories' (lose weight was probably

the intent) regardless of calorie consumption. Macronutrient profiles and

individual food types do no such thing, although as you point out, they can

have a tremendous impact on satiety. No, I don't eat 5000 calories of

broccoli!! ;)

> > You won't get *fat-soluble* ...

>

> Are you sure this is quite the fallacy? In reading accounts of

> hunting people living in the far north, i read that on a diet of

> certain kinds of low fat meat ( rabbit for example) even with

> UNLIMITED supply of such meat, the hunters would starve to

> death without some source of fat from fat meat, for example

> from an elk. The fat was regarded as precious! Of course,

> this is an extreme climate, and the fat is very protective, but

> the fact is, without this extra fat, starvation and death, even

> with unlimited supply of other protein.

Yup, you could starve even with an unlimited supply of extremely lean

protein, but that's not because you can't absorb " any " vitamins or minerals,

as was asserted. You just can't get the fat-soluble ones like vit E,

etcetera. You'd also die of scurvy long before you died of anything else.

Needless to say, even if your diet is a very low-fat diet of say 15% of

calories coming from fat (on an 1800 cal/day diet), you're in absolutely no

danger of that extreme problem. I also wouldn't advocate upping one's

intake to 50% fat in the form of butter or some other extreme... We simply

have no need for all that much fat, and it's less efficient that carbs, such

as veggies. You can also get good fat from fruits, like olives.

In essence, I disagree with the high sat fat argument being made right now,

insofar as it's paired with the contention that caloric intake has no

importance if you're freely eating good fats, butter, raw milk, etc...

Getting good fats and a balanced macronutrient profile (AS WELL AS a

balanced micronutrient profile) is all fine nutrition, but has little

bearing on the validity of the CR part of CRON.

Cheers,

________________________

Gifford

3-5 Humanities Centre

Department of English

University of Alberta

www.ualberta.ca/~gifford

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad someone's on my side ;)

-

--- In , " Hue " <kargo_cult@m...>

wrote:

> > ... A calorie is a calorie, although there is some suggestion

> > that a high fibre content can reduce the amount that some foods are

> > digested, and hence how much energy you actually get from

them...... Bottom line, eat 5000

> calories of broccoli a day and you'll gain weight, eat

> > 1800 calories a day of butter & you'll lose weight...

>

> This is not a good example. There are some foods you can

> realistically, eat ad lib and you will NOT gain weight. Why

> don't you try eating a diet of 5000 calories of broccoli a day?

> It is practically impossible. Satiety effects and even purely

> physical limitations apply. Same for an all-fruit diet: you will

> lose substantial weight, even with 10+ bananas a day. ( I have

> tried the fruit diet for a month or 2, many years ago, much

> foolishness, but you will be losing weight, i assure you.....)

>

> In thinking about calories, you have to consider the calorie

> density of the foods, and the availability of the calories. This

> is why the raw-foods people so often get into trouble; many

> of those by-the-book calories are simply flushed right thru

> the body and out.

> Hue

>

> > > 4.) You won't absorb any minerals/vitamins without

> > > sufficient fat present!

> >

> > This is a fallacy ( " any " ). You won't get *fat-soluble* vitamins

absorbed as

> > much, and that's the limit of the problem. Most minerals are absorbed

> > better on an empty stomach. Vit C is water soluble and you need

no fat to

> > absorb it, etc.

>

> Are you sure this is quite the fallacy? In reading accounts of

> hunting people living in the far north, i read that on a diet of

> certain kinds of low fat meat ( rabbit for example) even with

> UNLIMITED supply of such meat, the hunters would starve to

> death without some source of fat from fat meat, for example

> from an elk. The fat was regarded as precious! Of course,

> this is an extreme climate, and the fat is very protective, but

> the fact is, without this extra fat, starvation and death, even

> with unlimited supply of other protein.

> Hue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...