Guest guest Posted August 18, 2003 Report Share Posted August 18, 2003 A fascinating subject. Is anything in the cancer arena (or other disease areas) on the horizon? What do you mean that you have a " vested interest " . Are you a cancer survivor? I know a young person with young children who has an advanced case of breast cancer and I'd would be interested in any new news on the subject. Thanks in advance. on 8/17/2003 6:16 PM, Andy at endofthedream@... wrote: > There is much *serious* research in this area...been going > on for over a decade, especially in areas regarding cancer [i > obviously have a vested interest there!!] as well as other autoimmune > diseases. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2003 Report Share Posted August 18, 2003 > > > There is much *serious* research in this area...been going > > on for over a decade, especially in areas regarding cancer [i > > obviously have a vested interest there!!] as well as other > > autoimmune diseases. *****Yes, Francesca, I thought you knew. I was under the impression that I not only alluded to, but made SPECIFIC mention, in one of my very Looooong posts over the past week, that I was treated for cancer this past spring. I don't think I went into the details. Here they are: I contracted from who-knows-where??? a VERY rare form of Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma. There are about 38 variants of that. Some very treatable. Some not. Mine...well, when it was diagnosed (by pathologists at Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Hospital in NYC), according to the docs...there were about 20 cases " on the books. " Name: plasmablastic lymphoma ~ a variant of the large, diffused B- cell lymphoma (LDBCL), with a CD20 marker missing. Curiously, the majority of those with plasmablastic lymphoma are HIV + males. And for them it occurs primarily in the oral cavity. I am not HIV + ~ although I am male :-)) ~ ... and my cancer was located in the bone (though it was not bone cancer). So I was in a minority OF a minority. I guess mine will be " one for the books. " Since it is so new, and so rare, there really isn't any treatment for plasmablastic lymphoma. Yikes! There are only a handful of oncologists in the entire USA who have seen and dealt with this variant. Luckily, one of the most respected specialists is working at Sloan Kettering so I, in a way, lucked out. Plasmablastic lymphoma is treated the same way as the LDBCL (of which it is a subset), except that because of the absence of the CD20 marker an adjunct theraphy, Rituxan, was not administered. Rituxan dramatically increases the effects of the standard CHOP chemotheraphy, and (what's great!) it does not add any deleterious side effects. All it does is help. ... Unfortunately, with my type of cancer it was useless. So I underwent what is called an " accelerated CHOP treatment. " (Details can be supplied if anyone is interested.) I finished the three-month treatment all well and good and had my first post-treatment PET scan. Results: the three lesions which were present in late December are entirely gone. Clean bill of health. Treatment complete. My next (follow up) PET scan is in October. Will the cancer return? Who knows? Who cares! Any concern about that is purely imagination and I can imagine the most wonderful or the most horrible outcomes. Or do neither and just show up when the time arrives and see what happens. (I prefer to do that.) OK. Those are some of the gory specifics. But you were more interested, I'm sure, in the mindbody aspects of " healing. " There is a WEALTH of evidence that states-of-mind very directly affect the soma. And, in recent years, as a result of Pert's ground- breaking research, there is some understanding of exactly how thoughts directly affect and interact with the body. This is soooo off-topic for this group that I won't go into details here, but suffice it to say that at least one of the transmitting " elements " has been discovered: neuropeptides. They apparent carry thought- emotion from the arising site (in various locations in the brain) to other locales in the body. These can help heal or contribute to disease. So being able to somehow " control " thought-emotion may produce somatic healing, even far deeper than drugs, radiation and surgery. But it is never a sure-bet. A useful place to begin educating oneself on this is Bernie Siegel's " Love, Medicine and Miracles. " Some of the cancer treatments and side effects that are discussed in the book are severely out of date (book was written in the early-to-mid eighties), but it is the first solid introduction to the mindbody phenomenon. His followup book is also good: " Peace, Love, and Healing, " but I'd read them in chronological order. Bernie's work is derived from the initial research done by Carl Simonton and his wife. There's plenty of their stuff available also. One example (there are literally hundreds of these) of the power of thought on the soma: Mr. , a client of psychologist Bruno Klopfer in 1957, had far- advanced lymphosarcoma. All known treatments had become ineffective. Tumors the sie of oranges littered his neck, armpits, groin, chest, and abdomen. His spleen and liver were enormously enlaged. The thoracic lymph duct was swollen closed, and one to two quarts of milky liquid hd to be drained from his chest every day. He had to have oxygen to breathe, and his only medicine now was a sedative to help him on his way. Despite his state, Mr. still had hope. He'd heard of a new drug called Krebiozen, which was to be evaluated at the clinic where he lay. He didn't qualify for the program, because the experimenters wanted subjects with a life expectancy of at least three and preferably six months. begged so hard, however, that Klopfer decided to give him one injection on Friday, thinking that he would be dead by Monday and the remaining Krebiozen could be given to someone else. Left febrile, gasping for air, after the first injection of Krebiozen, Klopfer returned the next day to discover that the tumors had actually begun to shrink! Within a few days the tumor masses melted like snowballs on a hot stove. This was,of course, far more rapid regression than most radio-sensitive turmors could display under heavy X-ray treatment (and the docs already knew that his tumors were no longer sensative to radiation treatment). He had exactly one " shot " of Krebiozen. Period. And he was in a rapid - nearly visible - remission. He received a full complement of shots, three times weekly, and within 10 days he was discharged from his " death bed. " Practically all signs of his disease had vanished. The next day he took off in his own plane and flew at 12,000 feet with no discomfort. Now the kicker: within two months conflicting reports began to appear in the news media...all of the other testing clinics reported no success with Krebiozen. All the other patients died. Reading of this, Mr. became severely upset (he had been fine physically until this point). He was logical and rational in his scientific thinking and he began to lose faith in the treatment he had undergone. After two months of practically perfect health, after hearing of these reports, he relapsed into his original state and became very gloomy and miserable. He had to return to the hospital, his body rife with tumors again! (They appeared just a few days after he learned of the failure of the other clinics tests with Krebiozen. Curious, huh?). Well, Dr. Klopfer did not give up. He informed Mr. that the reason for the other failures was that the Krebiozen had deteriorated rapidly and that because had received the earliest (and freshest) injections, he had been " saved. " Klopfer told of a new, super-refined shipment, which he could administer immediately. This greatly elevated Mr. 's mood and he became his optimistic self again, eager to start over. By the time the " new shipment " of Krebiozen arrived, Mr. was almost ecstatic and his faith in its healing properties was very strong. With much fanfare, and putting on quite an act, Dr. Klopfer administered the first injection of the " doubly potent, super refined and fresh " preparation. The results of this treatment were quite unbelievable. Recovery from the second near-terminal state was even more dramatic than the first. Tumor masses literally melted over days, chest fluid vanished, and Mr. became ambulatory, and even went back to flying again. At this time he was certainly the picture of health. Oh. And by the way. Mr. never received an Krebiozen. It had been deemed a " failure. " What had been injected into Mr. , under the guise of being Krebiozen, was *Fresh Water*!!! And yet, profound and completely remission ensued in a matter of days. The injections (of water, unbeknowest to Mr. ) were continued since they they worked such wonders. Of course, Mr. *believed* he was getting Krebiozen all this time. He remained sympton-free for over two months. And then, again in the press, there was a final AMA annoucement that Krebiozen was proved " to be a worthless drug in treatment of cancer. " Of course this information got to Mr. . It was all over the news media. Within a few days of this report Mr. was readmitted to the hospital in extremis; his faith was entirely gone now, his last hope vanished, and he succumbed in less than two days. ------This " story " can be dismissed (and has been) by some. It is, however, factual. We don't know the " mechanism " by which the healing occured (it certainly wasn't the Krebiozen). But healing DID happen. And there are literally dozens of similar stories in the literature. You can read more of them in Simonton and Siegel's books. It is well established in psychological fields that mental attitude, thoughts, and emotions not only aid in healing, they may actual be a primary modality of healing. Certainly not in every case, and certainly not all the time. But the effects of thought- emotion on the body have a solid enough track record that I believe that state-of-mind should be utilized as strongly as " traditional " treatments for a whole host of diseases. For " expanded coverage " on this, see " Healing Back Pain " and " The Mindbody Connection " -- two books by Dr. Sarno -- that detail, with scientific precision, how mental states afflict the body (everything from " low back pain " to " allergies " to " headaches " and a host of autoimmune diseases such as lupus and fibromyalgia). In clear and precise detail, Dr. Sarno demonstrates how, by altering one's mental states, one can HEAL the body. And Sarno is not a psychologist/psychiatrist...he is an orthopedic surgeon...a " cut 'em up " man who became convinced, over his 30 years of doing surgery, that most of his operations were not only unnecessary, but useless. That the origin of the body's problems arose in the mind and it was THAT which needed healing. Healing of the body would follow quite naturally once the mental states were addressed (and sometimes that means addressing one's entire life circumstances!). Hope the above helps someone! I am availabe, as always, for continuing dialogue on this if anyone else is interested. I, for one, am a convert to this way of thinking. ~ andy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2003 Report Share Posted August 18, 2003 > Andy: thanks for your long explanatory post. Not off topic at all. > Anything related to living a long and healthy life is on topic. > I've heard about and read Simonton and Siegel and some of the > others - and no doubt some of our other list members have as well. > My own take is that the power of suggestion such as was outlined in > the story/example you gave works for some, but not for others. *****I would call it the " power of belief " rather than suggestion. All of the " stories " accumulated by Simonton/Siegel and others appear to have one common denominator: the successful individuals really and TRULY believed that whatever they were doing could help and/or " save " them. It was not a casual, superficial interest: it was butressed by a very deep belief, and there is a very high order of probability that the belief " infected " :-))) their unconscious so that the mind- state of " healing " was persisting 24/7, not just when one consciously thought about it. How many people can achieve this? Most, I believe. However, it appears to require either a very long training period in which the individual becomes cognizant and sensitive to the workings of his/her mind (e.g., my meditation training) OR one needs to be a very desperate person, ready (as Mr. was) to grasp at straws while not perceiving them as " straws " (or empty promises). > Something like the fact that some people can be hypnotised and some > can't. I seem to fall into the " can't " camp; for example I've > tried various herb therapies, acupuncture, chiropratic and > other therapies for maladies over the years that have worked for > many others, and never did a thing for me unfortunately - (but > fortunately I found CRON). *****Any conclusions about your ability/inability in the future are premature. OK. They didn't work for you before. That is not to suggest that they won't in the future. Perhaps there was some crucial element you were missing (e.g., this dialogue with me!) which might make all the difference. Have all the " maladies " you have suffered " over the years " persisted? Or have some disappeared (only to be replaced by others)? In either case, I strongly recommend giving Sarno's book, " The Mindbody Prescription: Healing the body Healing the Pain, " a look-see. > Is your training in Zen Buddhism and meditation helping you > cope ? *****Past tense, please! There is no coping now. Treatment, etc. is complete and recuperation is proceeding very smoothly. So: did all the " training " (meditation) help me cope during diagnosis and treatment? I'm sure it did. How could it not, seeing as I had 15+ years invested in it. (Also the 3+ years spent in psychotheraphy -- a type of " mind therapy " that supported the tenents of Buddhist Psychology -- played a not insignificant role in my " coping. " ) It's difficult to know just what helped me cope since so many things go into one's psychological makeup. Some of it was my basic personality, what I would refer to as my innate conditioning-in-the- moment. Some of it was a deep belief in the tenets of Advaita, the spiritual " foolosophy " :-)) that I ascribe to now. Some of it arose from working with an Indian " guru " named Sandeep. Family, friends, coworkers.....the entire gamut of my " social circle " played a positive and helpful role (not to mention the adept skill of my oncologist). > I'd love to be able to pass on anything I can to the beautiful, > bright, loving young mother I mentioned in my earlier post. *****Well, you have much material in my previous post. And if I, personally, one-on-one, can be of any help to her, know that I am here, ready, willing, and able. > Please keep posting! Your posts are simply wonderful. And you > have a wealth of info to share. *****Thank you for the sweet words. I should warn you, however, that the well may run dry soon! Hahaha!!! I've pretty much spilled all my " beans. " But we'll see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2003 Report Share Posted August 18, 2003 > Andy, I read about your lymphoma/chemo background in your original > intro to the list, and congratulate you on your success with the > treatment so far. *****Thank you for the kind words April. Truth be told, no congratulations are necessary as " I " didn't *do* anything. Stuff...happened in and through this bodymind mechanism. But there is no sense here that " Andy " was " controlling " any of it! There really wasn't any volition on my part. Sure, looking back at what happened, it appears that I exercised some control over my state-of- mind, but I think that is revisionist history. I don't see that " I " (as an individual with 'free will') had much to do with the success I experienced. If this is too weird for you, I apologize. I'm babbling Advaita foolosophy. But it played a significant role in how I saw and experienced the events of last year and this spring. A kind of " surrender " to what arose. > I appreciate your comments about the " mindbody " (vs. mind body) > as well as the astounding power of the brain mechanisms. > Personally, I believe it; wish I could control it. *****Yeah, that would be nice. It seems some very adept yogis can, actually, control their bodily functions. But that takes decades of intense, rigorous, unrelenting practice. Ready to move to the Himalayas or to Bombay? Hahaha!!!! > Originally, I thought you were talking about Enteric Neurological > System, which is sort of new science (relative). I've read stories > of doorstep cures based on this science. ENS explores intestinal > neurons that are the same as & function like those in the brain. *****Well, that is certainly part of the " science " I was alluding to. It has been known for quite some years that the stomach/intestines are a second " brain " (second does not suggest that it is subordinate, just that we learned of it after the original brain/mind was examined). I " learned " of it, firsthand, via meditation, in which one may become highly senstive to the immediate effects of thought on various parts of the body (tensing up, tingling, etc.). Whenever a psychological upset occurs (which is about every 5 minutes in MY life! Hahaha!!!), the attention is turned inward. This differs substantially from how we, in Western culture, are " trained " to deal with upset. The messages we are given, both consciously and subliminally via the popular media, are to run from the upset. Narcotize it. Eat it away. Exercise it out. Avoid the unpleasantness at all costs. Feel good! Be happy! But the approach used here is to go into it deeply, fully experience it, and not " think " about it, rationalize it, seek its causes, talk it out, etc. Instead, FEEL the upset, allow it to overwhelm you, and this non-thinking approach entails turning inward, to the body, experiencing how thought-emotion manifests itself physically. Sometimes doing this can be quite threatneing...almost feeling like annihilation. But one *does* surive it. What is appearing and being felt/experienced is only energy (perhaps an unpleasant wave of it to be sure!) moving through the bodymind mechanism, and if allowed to " have its way " with the bodymind mechanism, it does pass, eventually. What arises in its wake is a calm, serene perception. Not " bliss " or wonderful, elated joy. Just peace. Serenity. And it doesn't last either. Don't count on it. There will be other upsets, other waves of (unpleasant feeling) emotion. But each can be both survived and eradicated using the methodology suggested above. I've been doing this for years and this " meditative inquiry " approach taught me how thought-emotion manifests itself IN and THROUGH the body. For anyone interested in reading more about this, and learning how to put it into " practice " in one's life, take a look at Ezra Bayda's book, " Being Zen: Bringing Meditation to Life. " It is one of the most user-friendly descriptions of this way of living that I have encountered in 20 years. The term " zen " is hardly ever used in the book, and, although Mr. Bayda is, in fact, a zen teacher, his lessons are not steep in Eastern lore, but in plain, hard, down-to- earth " science. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.