Guest guest Posted October 5, 2003 Report Share Posted October 5, 2003 I posted a thread on this topic not too long ago and got no replies. Basically, I started thinking that perahaps flaxseeds were (especially from a CRON perspective) needless and perhaps harmful calories. The problem, I believe, stems from their poly content which is highly susceptible to oxidation (in the body as well). Ideally, a person should consume equal amounts of n-3 and n-6 but in small quantities. Ray Peat (whom I know most people will not agree with here) has written several interesting articles on the oxidation of non-saturated fats and how they may be responsible for cancer. Seems like nothing's safe to eat anymore, huh? - > In the September 2003 issue of Harvard Men's Health Watch, a monthy > newsletter published by Harvard Medical School, there was an article > which expressed SERIOUS concerns over the use of flaxseed ( " Flaxseed > oil: Healthful or Harmful " ). > > Essentially, the essay pointed out that several well-done studies > strongly suggested that the ALA present in flaxseed " may increase a > man's risk of prostate cancer. " They cautioned that " none of these > studies is conclusive, " but they felt the evidence was strong enough > to warrant avoiding - or least using minimally - flaxseed. The > article also suggested that the risks involved in flaxseed usage > probably escalated at higher dosages, but they gave no indication of > how much was considered " safe " (e.g., a daily UL as with vitamins). > > The authors mentioned that there are some other well-done studies > which seemed to exonerate flaxseed, and noted that " it's too early to > say whether flaxseeds are right for you. " > > However, the " tone " of the article can be summed up in this > statement: " At present, the limited evidence suggests that the seeds > are a better bet than the oil, though it's still a betting > proposition. While awaiting new studies, men who are attracted to > flaxseeds should consider the alternatives. The present evidence > favors fish as the best source of healthful omega-3 fatty acids. " > > Does anyone have an educated opinion on the above? (I used 2 > tablespoons of freshly ground flaxseed on my cereal, daily. I wonder > if this is considered risky?) > > ~ andy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 5, 2003 Report Share Posted October 5, 2003 ================================= ========================== On 05 Oct 2003, wrote: I posted a thread on this topic not too long ago and got no replies. Basically, I started thinking that perahaps flaxseeds were (especially from a CRON perspective) needless and perhaps harmful calories. The problem, I believe, stems from their poly content which is highly susceptible to oxidation (in the body as well). Ideally, a person should consume equal amounts of n-3 and n-6 but in small quantities. Ray Peat (whom I know most people will not agree with here) has written several interesting articles on the oxidation of non-saturated fats and how they may be responsible for cancer. Seems like nothing's safe to eat anymore, huh? - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 5, 2003 Report Share Posted October 5, 2003 Hello and CR ALL: Many of our CRONie friends have quit taking flax oil and quit the flax seeds too. In my particular case, I discontinued flax for reasons different from others. When I had ELISA blood anti-body allergy testing done (blood IgE, IgG immune cell allergy reactions), test results showed that I was highly allergic to the ground seeds, which I had been diligently preparing in a coffee grinder. Of all allergies that appeared on my testing, the flax reaction was the strongest and worst of all. You can imagine my shock and disappointment, esp after doing all the work to buy them and prepare them daily, all the time believing that I was doing something good for my health. Apparently mankind has not been consuming flax seeds historically over the centuries. This new food flax is one for which mankind is paleolithically mal-adapted. Flax may be a radically new food in our ancestral evolutionary heritage. -- Warren ================================= ========================== On 05 Oct 2003, wrote: I posted a thread on this topic not too long ago and got no replies. Basically, I started thinking that perhaps flaxseeds were (especially from a CRON perspective) needless and perhaps harmful calories. The problem, I believe, stems from their poly content which is highly susceptible to oxidation (in the body as well). Ideally, a person should consume equal amounts of n-3 and n-6 but in small quantities. Ray Peat (whom I know most people will not agree with here) has written several interesting articles on the oxidation of non-saturated fats and how they may be responsible for cancer. Seems like nothing's safe to eat anymore, huh? - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 5, 2003 Report Share Posted October 5, 2003 I too stopped consuming them after Warren's warning that they were a strong allergen. on 10/5/2003 3:25 PM, Warren at warren.taylor@... wrote: > When I had ELISA blood anti-body allergy testing done > (blood IgE, IgG immune cell allergy reactions), test results > showed that I was highly allergic to the ground seeds, > which I had been diligently preparing in a coffee grinder. > Of all allergies that appeared on my testing, the flax > reaction was the strongest and worst of all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 5, 2003 Report Share Posted October 5, 2003 ----- Original Message ----- From: " Warren " <warren.taylor@...> > Many of our CRONie friends have quit taking flax oil and > quit the flax seeds too. In my particular case, > I discontinued flax for reasons different from others. > > When I had ELISA blood anti-body allergy testing done > (blood IgE, IgG immune cell allergy reactions), test results > showed that I was highly allergic to the ground seeds..... For Warren- What did you replace flaxseed with? Did you experience any actual noticeable negative effects? In brief, what would be the danger of taking a moderate small amount of some allergen like this? ( I really don't know.) I'd also like anyone to give an opinion on something i've been using lately - cod liver oil, this in a formulation " Twinlab Emulsified Cod Liver Oil " . It is an orange - flavored thick syrup, nothing like the old fish oil of my young years. It seems to have about 2x the EPA/ DHA (tablespoonfull) as the next capsule contender, which is ( i think ) " Dale Fish Oil Concentrate " with about 230/ 130 mg per LARGE capsule. The only downside i can see with the cod oil, is it's about 4500 IU of A per the spoonfull, so 2 is around 9000 IU, and i understand high A may negatively affect calcium absorption. ( Though i unscientifically add, i have not noticed any slowing of my fingernail growth, etc. while taking both C and A ). -Hue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 5, 2003 Report Share Posted October 5, 2003 > Seems like nothing's safe to eat anymore, huh? > > - Amen. It's a minefield out there, yes? And i just opened a new package of flax last nite. But, it wouldn't be the first time i tossed a near full package of something, after learning it does not agree with me, or that i can not resist eating too many calories of it. Hue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 5, 2003 Report Share Posted October 5, 2003 Dr Snuffy Meyers, who has PCa, is against flaxseed oil for his patients. Checkout mailto:alternatives-admin@...and ask him. From what I recall not so adamant against flaxseed. Regards. ----- Original Message ----- From: Andy Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 12:23 PM Subject: [ ] Flaxseed Warnings for Men However, the "tone" of the article can be summed up in this statement: "At present, the limited evidence suggests that the seeds are a better bet than the oil, though it's still a betting proposition. While awaiting new studies, men who are attracted to flaxseeds should consider the alternatives. The present evidence favors fish as the best source of healthful omega-3 fatty acids."Does anyone have an educated opinion on the above? (I used 2 tablespoons of freshly ground flaxseed on my cereal, daily. I wonder if this is considered risky?)~ andy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 6, 2003 Report Share Posted October 6, 2003 Hello Hue and CR ALL, Important questions, and the answers are important too. See my quick responses embedded in the text. > -----Original Message----- > From: Hue [mailto:kargo_cult@...] > Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 1:02 PM > > Subject: Re: [ ] Flaxseed Warnings for Men > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: " Warren " <warren.taylor@...> > > > Many of our CRONie friends have quit taking flax oil and > > quit the flax seeds too. In my particular case, > > I discontinued flax for reasons different from others. > > > > When I had ELISA blood anti-body allergy testing done > > (blood IgE, IgG immune cell allergy reactions), test results > > showed that I was highly allergic to the ground seeds..... > > For Warren- > What did you replace flaxseed with? Replace flax with walnuts in the shell (if you are not allergic to walnuts). Walnuts have about 4 or 5 times less omega 3 (don't want too much omega-3, per Harvard Men's Health Newsletter). Walnuts are hand-cracked to prevent me from over-eating the tasty things. Also, hand-cracking helps to assure freshness if direct from the shell. Also be careful... Current year's crop of walnuts only, or else they are partially oxidized, fats are partially rancid, and they don't taste good either. Walnuts that come from a crop 2 years or older should be avoided. One-year old walnuts are OK. You can actually taste the difference that an extra year makes. Note: Nuts are among the top-10 items among allergy provocative foods. Those allergic might not know that they are actually allergic unless tested. And note this .... skin allergy is not a food allergy -- different. Food allergies come in many degrees and styles, and are challenging to pin down, especially delayed allergies that occur 1, 2, or 3 days later (IgG type). > Did you experience any actual noticeable negative effects? Bad effects were not detectable for me, because of all the other variables that affect me in daily life. Might feel a little run down, but I recognized no obvious symptoms. One allergy item that definitely made me extremely sick -- that was a total nightmare trying to figure out -- was ground turmeric, that I was taking at 2 TBL per day, in order to get the curcuminoid anti-oxidants. It took 2 or 3 months to figure this one out. My skin was turning yellow from taking it. People asked me why! > In brief, what would be the danger of taking a moderate > small amount of some allergen like this? ( I really don't > know.) Effects vary from person to person... and unpredictable. If I had taken turmeric at 2 tsp per day, instead of the 2 TBL per day, I might have felt under the weather, rather than mysteriously sick. It is a dosage thing, and a per-individual sensitivity thing. > > I'd also like anyone to give an opinion on something I've > been using lately - cod liver oil, this in a formulation > " Twinlab Emulsified Cod Liver Oil " . It is an orange - > flavored thick syrup, nothing like the old fish oil of > my young years. It seems to have about 2x the EPA/ > DHA (tablespoonful) as the next capsule contender, > which is ( I think ) " Dale Fish Oil Concentrate " > with about 230/ 130 mg per LARGE capsule. The only > downside I can see with the cod oil, is it's about 4500 IU > of A per the spoonful, so 2 is around 9000 IU, and I > understand high A may negatively affect calcium > absorption. The skeleton is critical for staying alive. The number one universal risk for osteoporosis is advancing age. Start adding other risk factors, and you jeopardize your bones, which you can not live safely without. > ( Though I unscientifically add, I have > not noticed any slowing of my fingernail growth, etc. > while taking both C and A ). > -Hue Fingernail growth rate -- unrelated to osteoporosis. Fingernail strength, maybe. Yes, over-dose of vitamin-A has adverse effects on bones. For every 5000 IU extra of pre-formed Vitamin-A (retinol form, like from cod-liver oil, acetate, succinate, chopped liver, etc), the Scandinavians were observed to have a doubling of their osteoporosis rate. Several American follow-up studies confirmed this. The Food and Nutrition Board of the National Academy of Sciences recently lowered the US RDA for Vitamin-A by 50 percent (cut it in half) because of the known risks. Vitamin-A in the beta-carotene form is OK -- non-toxic, OK for bones, and only converted inside the human body to retinol form if the body needs it. -- Warren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.