Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Evidence

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Tim: I have yet to be convinced that the ethnic slaughter in Bosnia was NOT related to Paxil. The clinical trials were done in Yugoslavia in 88-89, the same years that Slobo is now on trial for crimes against humanity. He's another psycho who was also under the influence of a psychiatrist, so it has always made me wonder if the ethnic cleansing killing squads hadn't been given this drug. In fact I wonder if Slobo wasn't on Paxil. It was also the psychiatrists who were behind the ethnic cleansing campaign in Germany -- in fact, it WAS the psychiatrists who decided that the Jews and the disabled were genetically inferior. It's why my mantra is "Psychiatrists are the beating heart of evil in our society."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tim: I have yet to be convinced that the ethnic slaughter in Bosnia was NOT related to Paxil. The clinical trials were done in Yugoslavia in 88-89, the same years that Slobo is now on trial for crimes against humanity. He's another psycho who was also under the influence of a psychiatrist, so it has always made me wonder if the ethnic cleansing killing squads hadn't been given this drug. In fact I wonder if Slobo wasn't on Paxil. It was also the psychiatrists who were behind the ethnic cleansing campaign in Germany -- in fact, it WAS the psychiatrists who decided that the Jews and the disabled were genetically inferior. It's why my mantra is "Psychiatrists are the beating heart of evil in our society."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think of it this way...you are part of a new global conspiracy.

Tim,

LOL - you just said the magic words!!!

ps. I was so unnerved of your news about the suicide bombers on

ssris. it just never occurred to me. you said something awhile back

about oj simpson. he was on ssris too? i really didn't follow his

trial very closely but could hardly avoid it completely but i never

heard anything about his being on an antidepressant. why didn't they

use that in the defense?

I met some friends today and started talking about the whole ssri -

drug cartel thing and my one friend, who I haven't seen in awhile,

said she was really happy to see me care about something again. I

just didn't realise how flatlined I've been the last few years until

I started tapering, so I guess there is some life left in me after

all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think of it this way...you are part of a new global conspiracy.

Tim,

LOL - you just said the magic words!!!

ps. I was so unnerved of your news about the suicide bombers on

ssris. it just never occurred to me. you said something awhile back

about oj simpson. he was on ssris too? i really didn't follow his

trial very closely but could hardly avoid it completely but i never

heard anything about his being on an antidepressant. why didn't they

use that in the defense?

I met some friends today and started talking about the whole ssri -

drug cartel thing and my one friend, who I haven't seen in awhile,

said she was really happy to see me care about something again. I

just didn't realise how flatlined I've been the last few years until

I started tapering, so I guess there is some life left in me after

all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

I'm sorry, Roy...a computer whiz I'm not! ;'-))

There are three ways you can participate:

1) Seed Panel: this group is charged with creating original material

based on the evidence found in the literature. They meet about 1/mo during

the time the material/chapter need to be generated. Once they have reached

consensus, their material is forwarded to the Nominal Panel for their

consensus. If /when the Nominal Panel thinks a topic/wording needs to be

reworked, they convene again until that part is handled.

2) The Nominal Panel reviews the material from the Seed Panels. When

materail is available, they meet once/month to review it and reach their

consensus.

3) The Delphi Process: this is a group of about 100 docs who

receive, through the mail, the material the Nominal Panel has approved. In

the convenience of their office, they review the writings and agree or

disagree with comments allowed for suggested changes or reasons for

disagreement.

You can participate in one arena or all three. It is a stimulating

process...I personally love sitting down with 10 - 15 of my peer and

reviewing what we want to say to the public and insurances and legal field.

It seems affirming to me.

You would be a welcome addition. Join us. Contact Dave McTeague at 503

378-5816 with your interest.

Sunny Kierstyn RN DC ;'-))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Yes, Francesca. And not only, as you say, " what their evidence is "

but also, as Walford brilliantly points out, what evidence is worth

paying attention to and which should be consigned to the ash can.

[Where else have we seen a clear exposition of the different types of

evidence and their likely reliability]

Rodney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...