Guest guest Posted November 6, 2003 Report Share Posted November 6, 2003 Hello CR ALL: What is the size of your LDL particles? Do you have the safe, healthy " large fluffy LDLs? " . Here is a way to tell. " A low TG/HDL ratio is indicative of primarily large, non-atherogenic LDL particles, whereas a high TG/HDL ratio indicates a greater population of small, dense pro-atherogenic LDL particles. Prospective studies indicate that a low TG/HDL is highly correlated with a reduction in the development of cardiovascular disease (11,12). " http://www.zonediet.com/evidencewellpg.htm The anti-aging blood test report card says that the most important result of your cholesterol readings is the surrogate marker for fasting insulin, equal to the TG/HDL ratio: (Fasting Triglycerides) divided by (HDL Cholesterol) A simple blood cholesterol test is all that is required to compute your TG/HDL ratio. Interpretation: Values 4.0 and above -- Diseased Values 3.0 to 3.99 -- On the Path to Disease Values 2.0 to 2.99 -- Poor Health Values 1.0 to 1.99 -- Good Health Values less than 1.0 -- Superior Health Here are sample blood test report cards: ------------------------------------------- Dean Pomerleau [Zone diet]: Item Value Acceptable Range ------------ ----- ---------------- Triglycerides 49 < 200 Direct HDL 68 > 35 Fast Tri/HDL Ratio 0.72 < 2.0 [Previous to CR, ratio value was ???]. ------------------------------------------- Saul Lubkin [Zone diet]: Item Value Acceptable Range ------------ ----- ---------------- Triglycerides 35 < 200 Direct HDL 74 > 35 Fast Tri/HDL Ratio 0.47 < 2.0 [Previous to CR, ratio value was ???]. ------------------------------------------- Warren [Zone diet]: Item Value Acceptable Range ------------ ----- ---------------- Triglycerides 33 < 200 Direct HDL 54 > 35 Fast Tri/HDL Ratio 0.61 < 2.0 [Previous to CR, ratio value was 2.38]. ------------------------------------------- Khurram Hashmi [Zone diet]: Item Value Acceptable Range ------------ ----- ---------------- Triglycerides 39 < 200 Direct HDL 53 > 35 Fast Tri/HDL Ratio 0.74 < 2.0 [Previous to CR, ratio value was 1.79]. ------------------------------------------- Phil Graves [Zone diet]: Item Value Acceptable Range ------------ ----- ---------------- Triglycerides 45 < 200 Direct HDL 92 > 35 Fast Tri/HDL Ratio 0.49 < 2.0 [Previous to CR, ratio value was 2.67]. -------------------------------------------- Colin [Walford diet]: Item Value Acceptable Range ------------ ----- ---------------- Triglycerides 49 < 200 Direct HDL 74 > 35 Fast Tri/HDL Ratio 0.66 < 2.0 [Previous to CR, ratio value was 7.52 (316/42)]. -------------------------------------------- Greg [Zone diet]: Item Value Acceptable Range ------------ ----- ---------------- Triglycerides 55 < 200 Direct HDL 71 > 35 Fast Tri/HDL Ratio 0.77 < 2.0 [Previous to CR, ratio value was ???]. -------------------------------------------- It is your reduction in calories that improves this ratio, and not just the genetic cards you were dealt at birth. -- Warren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.