Guest guest Posted January 13, 2004 Report Share Posted January 13, 2004 Hi folks: Just for the record, vitamin D is one of the vitamins you CAN get too much of. Here are the symptoms of vitamin D excess - just so we know. It is from Merck, so it should be reliable: " Vitamin D Excess Taking very high daily doses of vitamin D over several months can cause toxicity and a high calcium level in the blood (hypercalcemia (see Section 12, Chapter 155)). Early symptoms are loss of appetite, nausea, and vomiting, followed by excessive thirst, weakness, nervousness, and high blood pressure. Because the calcium level is high, calcium may be deposited throughout the body, particularly in the kidneys, blood vessels, lungs, and heart. The kidneys may be permanently damaged and malfunction. As a result, urination increases, protein passes into the urine, and the level of urea (a waste product) increases in the blood. Kidney failure may result. Vitamin D excess is usually diagnosed when blood tests detect a high calcium level in a person who takes high doses of vitamin D. The diagnosis is confirmed by measuring the level of vitamin D in the blood. Treatment consists of discontinuing vitamin D supplements, following a low-calcium diet for a while to offset the effects of a high calcium level in the body, and taking drugs to suppress the release of calcium from the bones. " > Here's an article which says that Vitamin D supplements are actually MORE > desirable than getting Vit D from food. Curiously there is no mention of > the fact that one of the best sources of Vit D is from sunlight. ( A while > back we had a discussion of the many desirable aspects of getting enough > light through the retina and going outside even on dark cloudy wintry days.) > > If anyone has the actual study which is pointed out below, please post. > Thanks in advance: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2004 Report Share Posted January 13, 2004 Also, colon cancer is far more prevalent in northern climates. So that may (POSSIBLY) also be prevented by vitamin D supplements in modest amounts. Rodney. > Here's an article which says that Vitamin D supplements are actually MORE > desirable than getting Vit D from food. Curiously there is no mention of > the fact that one of the best sources of Vit D is from sunlight. ( A while > back we had a discussion of the many desirable aspects of getting enough > light through the retina and going outside even on dark cloudy wintry days.) > > If anyone has the actual study which is pointed out below, please post. > Thanks in advance: > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2004 Report Share Posted January 14, 2004 While the statement below is technically correct, according to government/university studies I read before beginning vit. D supplementation (sorry, I cannot remember or cite the exact sources), virtually everyone can tolerate 2000 IUs of vit. D per day without adverse effect and most people can tolerate 3000 IUs per day. I believe these numbers are well above the daily dosage level of most people. FWIW, I personally take about 1600 IUs per day without apparent problem and hopefully it has some benefit to me. --- In , " Rodney " <perspect1111@y...> wrote: > Just for the record, vitamin D is one of the vitamins you CAN get > too much of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2004 Report Share Posted January 15, 2004 VERY interesting post, Apricot (thank you). It raises a whole bunch of questions ......... I hope you don't mind my asking them! --- In , apricot85 <apricot85@a...> wrote: > Based on results of chronic low D test, I tried D supps in dry capsule > form. XXXXX How did you find out you were D deficient? Did you have symptoms of some kind? XXXXX For 6 mos, I took 3,000 to 6,000 with no effect on blood levels. XXXXX Now isn't that interesting. WOW. XXXXX > Was worse than nothing since I paid for the dang supps, & my D declined > further. It may be that this form is useless (for ME), while oil based > would've worked fine. XXXXX Do you know for sure that: " ... oil based would've worked fine. " ? XXXXX > Spring/summer sun returns (Sun definitely works per testing) & D levels > are satisfactory with 15 mins 3 times/wk on sunny days. XXXXX So for a satisfactory vitamin D level how much of your skin surface has to be exposed to the sun 15 minutes 3 times/wk ???? (Is just the face/hands enough? Or do you have to be in a swimsuit?) XXXXX > With low D again this winter I tried a sun lamp (encouraged by studies & > Univ of Boston). Suprise, this worked... and I don't even get a tan. XXXXX If you don't mind my asking (!) how often per week and how long per session did you use the sun lamp (that DID work for you) and roughly what percentage of your skin was exposed to the UV under the lamp for that period? XXXXX > The lamp is a bit of a hassle & now that my D is OK, I'm periodically > using emulsified cod liver oil. Effect CLO on blood testing not yet > known. XXXXX Please let us know whether or not the CLO works for you. XXXXX > If you don't get sun, office worker, washington state area, I would > definitely get tested. D is essential to bone health & so many critical > metabolic processes. For me, I couldn't sleep for more than 2 hours > everytime my D was low... it was BAD & the problem always goes away when > I get sun/D ... I am so happy to be able to sleep again. XXXXX Thanks Apricot. XXXXX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.