Re: What a post! (was: 13 seconds per Calorie)

[Guest guest]

Katrina: my hat is off to you! Of course we would have to assume that these

diets are optimal in nutrition!

Unless Rodney or anyone else can find something wrong with your

calculations, I'd like to put your post in our " hall of fame " or IOW the

files.

on 1/28/2004 12:20 PM, katrinacrader at katnap@... wrote:

> So each calorie saved after age 30 will give us an improvement in C/L

> of .224 minutes (13.44 seconds). So we are saving 13 seconds per

> calorie, which seems like a more reasonable number to me. And I

> think this is a number that is real and practical to the people

> practising CR. Obviously, your own number will change according to

> when you started CR. This is like the sleep number adverts :-)

> What's your CR number?

>

> All this, of course, is assuming we gain 20 years for a 26% reduction

> in calories. I included all of my workings so people can tell me

> where I went wrong.

>

> Katrina.