Guest guest Posted January 20, 2004 Report Share Posted January 20, 2004 Hi folks: Here are another couple of numbers relating to possible dangers inherent in using BMI to determine a weight objective for CRON. It has been previously mentioned that BMI takes no account of variations in muscle mass or bone mass among individuals. A BMI measurement implicitly assumes that any additional weight of those who are more muscular than the average, or have a more substantial bone structure than average, is fat - NOT the bone or muscle that it really is. As a teenager I drank large quantities of milk and got a huge amount of exercise, which may account for the fact that my bone structure appears to have been above the top end of most scales. The following explains the implications of this for BMI and CRON. Using the US Navy method for calculating BF% which I posted here recently (yesterday I think it was) I have now calculated that if I were to drop my BF% to 10% my BMI would be 21.5! If I dropped my BMI to 20 my BF% would be 3.3%!! If I dropped my BMI to 18 my BF% would be MINUS 7.5%!!!!!! Most people would consider that to be unhealthy ;; ^ ) It makes sense, it seems to me, to pay close attention to Dr. Walford's 'do not go below' data for body fat percentage. Rodney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.