Guest guest Posted January 4, 2008 Report Share Posted January 4, 2008 Here's one from Wikipedia: /Main article: Mythology <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mythology>/ In the academic fields of mythology <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mythology>, mythography <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mythography>, or folkloristics <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folkloristics>, a *myth* (/mythos <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mythos>/) is a sacred story <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Story> concerning the origins of the world or how the world and the creatures in it came to be in their present form. The active beings in myths are generally gods and heroes. Myths often are said to take place before recorded history begins. In saying that a myth is a sacred narrative, what is meant is that a myth is believed to be true by people who attach religious or spiritual significance to it. Use of the term by scholars does not imply that the narrative is either true or false. See also legend <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legend> and tale <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narrative>. A /myth/ in popular use is something that is widely thought to be false. This usage, which is often pejorative, arose from labeling the religious myths and beliefs of other cultures as being incorrect, but it has spread to cover non-religious beliefs as well. Because of this usage, many people take offense when the religious narratives they believe to be true are called myths (see Religion and mythology <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_and_mythology> for more information). This usage is frequently confused with fiction <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiction>, legend <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legend>, fairy tale <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairy_tale>, folklore <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folklore>, fable <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fable>, and urban legend <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_legend>, each of which has a distinct meaning in academia. End of quote. > Re: Iodine Book that I just saw > <hypothyroidism/message/34272;_ylc=X3oDMTJxdGowNXI\ yBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzE0NTY2NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDkyNTEwODIEbXNnSWQDMzQyNzIEc2V\ jA2Rtc2cEc2xrA3Ztc2cEc3RpbWUDMTE5OTQxNjE3Ng--> > > > > Posted by: " and Irwin " familyirwin@... > <mailto:familyirwin@...?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Iodine%20Book%20that%20I%20\ just%20saw> > fritzalseth <fritzalseth> > > > Thu Jan 3, 2008 4:51 pm (PST) > > Myth? By whose definition? Excuse me, men and women, I too, am an > engineer, that's true. > > Blessings, > > > <res075oh@... <mailto:res075oh%40verizon.net>> wrote: > The " 6000 year theory " is not even a theory; it's a myth. Huffing and > puffing won't change anything. > > Scientists are men AND WOMEN. And not one worth a toot supports a 6000 > year life span on earth. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.