Guest guest Posted November 28, 2008 Report Share Posted November 28, 2008 ummm, they will get the results they are seeking if they are not using iodine/iodide and the dose is too low. I would question the methodology. Gracia Gracia, You wrote: > > this is myth. this does not happen to ppl who take 50--100mg > iodine/iodide, which is recommended for hashis. iodine is the cure, not > the cause. Then it is a rather well documented myth: Rink, T., Schroth, H.J., Holle, L.H. and Garth, H. (1999). Effect of Iodine and Thyroid Hormones in the Induction and Therapy of Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis. Nuklearmedizin. 1999.; 38(5):144-9. in PubMed online. " Iodine: an environmental trigger of thyroiditis, " Rose N.R. Bonita R.; Burek C.L., Autoimmunity Reviews, Volume 1, Number 1, February 2002 , pp. 97-103(7). Summary: • Chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis (CLT) is a multifactorial autoimmune disease with genetic and environmental factors contributing to its development. • The best-defined environmental factor is dietary iodine. • Poorly-iodinated thyroglobulin is not well recognized by peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) from patients with CLT. • Iodination of thyroglobulin promotes recognition and proliferation by patients’ PBL. Canada's federal health agency issued a warning in 2003 for people with Hashimoto's to stay away from kelp, because you might get as much as 4 mg per day by following the directions: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ahc-asc/media/advisories-avis/2003/2003_27_e.html More: Effect of Iodine Restriction on Thyroid Function in Patients With Primary Hypothyroidism. Kanji Kasagi, Masahiro Iwata, Takashi Misaki, Junji Konishi Thyroid 13(6):561-567, 2003. Control of efficiency and results, and adverse effects of excess iodine administration on thyroid function. Koutras A. , Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 57: 463-469, 1996. Chronic autoimmune thyroiditis. Dayan CM, s GH., N Engl J Med 335: 99-107, 1996. Shilo, S, Hirsch, HJ, " Iodine-induced hyperthyroidism in a patient with a normal thyroid gland, Postgrad Med J. 62:661–2 (1986) Hartman, AA. Hyperthyroidism during administration of kelp tablets. Ned Tijdschr Geneesk 134:1373 (1990). de Smet, PA, Stricker, BH, Wilderink, F, Wiersinga, WM, " Hyperthyroidism during treatment with kelp tablets, " Ned Tijdschr Geneesk 134:1373 (1990). Eliason, BC, " Transient hyperthyroidism in a patient taking dietary supplements containing kelp, " J Am Board Fam Pract 11:478–80 (1998) Henzen C, Buess M, Brander L., " Iodine-induced hyperthyroidism (iodine-induced Basedow’s disease): a current disease picture, " Schweiz Med Wochenschr 129:658–64 (1999) Ishizuki Y, Yamauchi K, Miura Y, " Transient thyrotoxicosis induced by Japanese kombu, " Nippon Naibunpi Gakkai Zasshi 65:91–8 (1989). " Iodine-Induced Thyrotoxicosis After Ingestion of Kelp-Containing Tea, " Karsten Mussig, Claus Thamer, Roland Bares, Hans- Lipp, Hans-Ulrich Haring, Baptist Gallwitz, J. Gen. Internal Med. 416, 1525 (2006). Chuck ------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 Gracia, You wrote: > ... I would question the methodology. That is what the peer review is for. They have a panel of experts who have spent years researching in the field in question and years of designing or rejecting experimental methodology. For the papers I cited, such a panel determined that the conclusions given were justified by the standards of scientific rigor. Chuck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 One of the strengths of the peer review process is that professionals in the field who actually have the ability to do so are encouraged to question the methodology. The chances that you or I with our lack of proper education would find a problem that the experts would miss becomes vanishingly small IMHO. .. .. > Posted by: " Gracia " circe@... > <mailto:circe@...?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Iodine%20triggers%20Hashimoto%27s\ > > graciabee <graciabee> > > > Fri Nov 28, 2008 9:23 pm (PST) > > > ummm, they will get the results they are seeking if they are not using > iodine/iodide and the dose is too low. I would question the methodology. > Gracia > > Gracia, > > You wrote: > > > > this is myth. this does not happen to ppl who take 50--100mg > > iodine/iodide, which is recommended for hashis. iodine is the cure, not > > the cause. > > Then it is a rather well documented myth: > > Rink, T., Schroth, H.J., Holle, L.H. and Garth, H. (1999). Effect of > Iodine and Thyroid Hormones in the Induction and Therapy of Hashimoto’s > Thyroiditis. Nuklearmedizin. 1999.; 38(5):144-9. in PubMed online. > > " Iodine: an environmental trigger of thyroiditis, > " Rose N.R. Bonita R.; > Burek C.L., Autoimmunity Reviews, Volume 1, Number 1, February 2002 , > pp. 97-103(7). > > Summary: > > • Chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis (CLT) is a multifactorial autoimmune > disease with genetic and environmental factors contributing to its > development. > • The best-defined environmental factor is dietary iodine. > • Poorly-iodinated thyroglobulin is not well recognized by peripheral > blood lymphocytes (PBL) from patients with CLT. > • Iodination of thyroglobulin promotes recognition and proliferation by > patients’ PBL. > > Canada's federal health agency issued a warning in 2003 for people with > Hashimoto's to stay away from kelp, because you might get as much as 4 > mg per day by following the directions: > > http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ahc-asc/media/advisories-avis/2003/2003_27_e.html > <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ahc-asc/media/advisories-avis/2003/2003_27_e.html> > > More: > > Effect of Iodine Restriction on Thyroid Function in Patients With > Primary Hypothyroidism. Kanji Kasagi, Masahiro Iwata, Takashi Misaki, > Junji Konishi Thyroid 13(6):561-567, 2003. > > Control of efficiency and results, and adverse effects of excess iodine > administration on thyroid function. Koutras A. , Ann Endocrinol (Paris) > 57: 463-469, 1996. > > Chronic autoimmune thyroiditis. Dayan CM, s GH., N Engl J Med 335: > 99-107, 1996. > > Shilo, S, Hirsch, HJ, " Iodine-induced hyperthyroidism in a patient with > a normal thyroid gland, Postgrad Med J. 62:661–2 (1986) > > Hartman, AA. Hyperthyroidism during administration of kelp tablets. > Ned Tijdschr Geneesk 134:1373 (1990). > > de Smet, PA, Stricker, BH, Wilderink, F, Wiersinga, WM, " Hyperthyroidism > during treatment with kelp tablets, " Ned Tijdschr Geneesk 134:1373 (1990). > > Eliason, BC, " Transient hyperthyroidism in a patient taking dietary > supplements containing kelp, " J Am Board Fam Pract 11:478–80 (1998) > > Henzen C, Buess M, Brander L., " Iodine-induced hyperthyroidism > (iodine-induced Basedow’s disease): a current disease picture, " Schweiz > Med Wochenschr 129:658–64 (1999) > > Ishizuki Y, Yamauchi K, Miura Y, " Transient thyrotoxicosis induced by > Japanese kombu, " Nippon Naibunpi Gakkai Zasshi 65:91–8 (1989). > > " Iodine-Induced Thyrotoxicosis After Ingestion of Kelp-Containing Tea, " > Karsten Mussig, Claus Thamer, Roland Bares, Hans- Lipp, Hans-Ulrich > Haring, Baptist Gallwitz, J. Gen. Internal Med. 416, 1525 (2006). > > Chuck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 wrote: > One of the strengths of the peer review process is that professionals in > the field who actually have the ability to do so are encouraged to > question the methodology. The chances that you or I with our lack of > proper education would find a problem that the experts would miss > becomes vanishingly small IMHO. > > And yet, new paradigms don't often take root until the death of the old guards who have a personal interests in not being wrong during their life time. Peer reviewed journals are reviews by " peers " that have already invested their egos in a certain paradigm and they tend to exclude papers that don't fit their current models. Saturated fat, good or bad? Americans have cut down on fat and heart disease has increased. Try getting a paper published on diet that doesn't take a hard line mainstream view that saturated fats are a primary cause of heart disease and must be minimized. Or the following issues, polyunsaturated don't fats cause thyroid resistance(it's not real), TSH is diagnostic of hyper/hypo, syndrome X is something new, not thyroid resistance, the RDA is all you need, trans-fats are a healthy choice (ok it's taken decades and 10s of 1000s of cardio deaths, but some are backing off this dogma), statins reduce mortality, there was a big bang, etc. -- Steve - dudescholar4@... Take World's Smallest Political Quiz at http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html " If a thousand old beliefs were ruined on our march to truth we must still march on. " --Stopford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 wrote: > One of the strengths of the peer review process is that professionals in > the field who actually have the ability to do so are encouraged to > question the methodology. The chances that you or I with our lack of > proper education would find a problem that the experts would miss > becomes vanishingly small IMHO. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions -- Steve - dudescholar4@... Take World's Smallest Political Quiz at http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html " If a thousand old beliefs were ruined on our march to truth we must still march on. " --Stopford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 Steve, Kuhn repeatedly disavowed the extreme postmodern interpretations of his model, admitting that he had to " cherry pick " the data to make his original thesis in 1962. A few years before he died in the 90s, he told Scientific American, " I've often said I'm much fonder of my critics than my fans. " Although Kuhn's _Structure_ was a very hot topic in the 70s and 80s, most scientists today are much more swayed by the criticism of postmodern attacks on the scientific method implied in Sokal's hoax. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair Chuck > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 how can that be? using 3mg of iodine is different from using 50mg iodine/iodide with ATP cofactors. there is a study going on right now at http://www.breastcancerchoices.org and Brownstein is looking for men who have prostate cancer to see how iodine affects it. Gracia Gracia, You wrote: > ... I would question the methodology. That is what the peer review is for. They have a panel of experts who have spent years researching in the field in question and years of designing or rejecting experimental methodology. For the papers I cited, such a panel determined that the conclusions given were justified by the standards of scientific rigor. Chuck ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Internal Virus Database is out of date. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.9/1805 - Release Date: 11/22/2008 10:34 AM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 Gracia, I went to the site and could not find any legitimate research. I did find a web page called " The Iodine Investigation Project, " in which the folks at Optimox offer a free loading test to women with breast cancer in exchange for them buying Iodoral and reporting back when they are cured. If you think that or Brownstein's prostate survey is remotely close to meeting the rigorous standards of peer reviewed research, then you have no right questioning the methodology of studies that have passed reviews both in getting funding awarded and in getting the results published. Chuck You wrote: > > how can that be? using 3mg of iodine is different from using 50mg > iodine/iodide with ATP cofactors. there is a study going on right now at > http://www.breastcancerchoices.org <http://www.breastcancerchoices.org> > and Brownstein is looking for men who have prostate cancer to see how > iodine affects it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 Good point. However, I find the big bang very well supported and the counter ideas not convincing. Of course, the latest views of the BB aren't the same as the original one [same with evolution]. I do have a bit of trouble philosophically in wrapping my head around the usual explanation of inflation, although I see the need in many models. .. .. > > Posted by: " Steve " dudescholar4@... > <mailto:dudescholar4@...?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Iodine%20triggers%20Hashim\ oto%27s> > dudescholar <dudescholar> > > > Sat Nov 29, 2008 12:22 pm (PST) > > > > wrote: > > One of the strengths of the peer review process is that > professionals in > > the field who actually have the ability to do so are encouraged to > > question the methodology. The chances that you or I with our lack of > > proper education would find a problem that the experts would miss > > becomes vanishingly small IMHO. > > > > > > And yet, new paradigms don't often take root until the death of the old > guards who have a personal interests in not being wrong during their > life time. Peer reviewed journals are reviews by " peers " that have > already invested their egos in a certain paradigm and they tend to > exclude papers that don't fit their current models. > > Saturated fat, good or bad? Americans have cut down on fat and heart > disease has increased. Try getting a paper published on diet that > doesn't take a hard line mainstream view that saturated fats are a > primary cause of heart disease and must be minimized. Or the following > issues, polyunsaturated don't fats cause thyroid resistance(it' > s not > real), TSH is diagnostic of hyper/hypo, syndrome X is something new, not > thyroid resistance, the RDA is all you need, trans-fats are a healthy > choice (ok it's taken decades and 10s of 1000s of cardio deaths, but > some are backing off this dogma), statins reduce mortality, there was a > big bang, etc. > > -- > > Steve - dudescholar4@... <mailto:dudescholar4%40basicmail.net> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 That's IMHO a good article. It's probably of more interest to those who are not familiar with the concepts involved. I do not find any unfamiliar concepts in it, but that doesn't change the fact that I would be very unlikely to be able to recognize a discrepancy in the methodology of research in which the experts had failed to do so. I simply do not have the education and experience to do so. .. .. > > Posted by: " Steve " dudescholar4@... > <mailto:dudescholar4@...?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Iodine%20triggers%20Hashim\ oto%27s> > dudescholar <dudescholar> > > > Sat Nov 29, 2008 12:23 pm (PST) > > > > wrote: > > One of the strengths of the peer review process is that > professionals in > > the field who actually have the ability to do so are encouraged to > > question the methodology. The chances that you or I with our lack of > > proper education would find a problem that the experts would miss > > becomes vanishingly small IMHO. > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions> > > -- > > Steve - dudescholar4@... <mailto:dudescholar4%40basicmail.net> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 2, 2008 Report Share Posted December 2, 2008 The Sokal hoax doesn't apply to the point that science advances in a method that Kuhn addressed with the current share holders putting the brakes on change using BS style support of the present system(s). Science WAS highly supportive of an earth centered universe ... the list is large and no doubt in 50 years that list will be full of some of the " truths " that are promoted today with scientific vigor and contempt for any differing voices. Arp for example has published some very valuable material on how new and old galaxies with different red light shifts are interacting gravitationally when their respective red light shifts would place them too far apart/different speeds. The assumed dogma that red light shift defines distance appears (pun intended) to be quite incorrect. Not liking the results of his observations, he was later denied telescope time by those with an interested in maintaining the present " truths " . Arp published the catalog of " Peculiar Galaxies " . His photos and measurements kick out one of the legs on which the big bang, and most of present cosmology, rest. Kuhn is a good reference here regardless of any ostensible retroactive misgivings. The only use for Sokal is as a tool to discount those who don't toe the line of current " truths " . But, we are straying far from " Iodine cures most everything " and/or " it is most dangerous in any curable amounts " . Steve Chuck B wrote: > Steve, > > Kuhn repeatedly disavowed the extreme postmodern interpretations > of his model, admitting that he had to " cherry pick " the data to make > his original thesis in 1962. A few years before he died in the 90s, he > told Scientific American, " I've often said I'm much fonder of my critics > than my fans. " > > Although Kuhn's _Structure_ was a very hot topic in the 70s and 80s, > most scientists today are much more swayed by the criticism of > postmodern attacks on the scientific method implied in Sokal's hoax. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair > > Chuck > > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions> -- Steve - dudescholar4@... Take World's Smallest Political Quiz at http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html " If a thousand old beliefs were ruined on our march to truth we must still march on. " --Stopford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2008 Report Share Posted December 3, 2008 Steve, You wrote: > > ...Arp published the catalog of " Peculiar Galaxies " . His photos and > measurements kick out one of the legs on which the big bang, and most of > present cosmology, rest.... Halton Arp's 1966 catalog showed pictures of 338 oddly shaped galaxies, five of which happen to be in front of high red shift quasars. He claimed the quasars came out of the galaxies, and that their high red shifts are due to some unknown optical effect. His improper use of statistics was recognized in ApJ less than a year after his 1966 paper in Science, but the controversy continued for about 20 years. During this time evidence accumulated that all of his examples were cases of accidental alignment. The reduction in his observing hours in 1981 happened because he persisted in chasing peculiar combinations of galaxies with quasars. His own institutional pre-review told him the same thing as the user group at the telescope, that his proposals were " repetitive, lacking in focus and specific goals. " He was warned of this in several reviews, before they started reducing his time. His choice to keep proposing the same old thing, that no one thought was productive, let alone relevant, is what did him in. He then chose to move to Europe. Since then, the astronomical community has mostly considered this a closed issue. Arp is generally considered a crackpot, even more than the iodine docs. Chuck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2008 Report Share Posted December 3, 2008 iodine docs are highly esteemed in the circles I frequent. gracia. Since then, the astronomical community has mostly considered this a closed issue. Arp is generally considered a crackpot, even more than the iodine docs. Chuck ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.13/1827 - Release Date: 12/3/2008 5:41 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2008 Report Share Posted December 4, 2008 Gracia, You wrote: > > iodine docs are highly esteemed in the circles I frequent. No doubt. Arp is highly regarded in his circle. Hardly any of them are professional astronomers, though. Chuck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2008 Report Share Posted December 4, 2008 I admire brilliant ppl who can recognize other brilliant ppl. Gracia Gracia, You wrote: > > iodine docs are highly esteemed in the circles I frequent. No doubt. Arp is highly regarded in his circle. Hardly any of them are professional astronomers, though. Chuck ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.14/1829 - Release Date: 12/4/2008 2:59 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 5, 2008 Report Share Posted December 5, 2008 Brilliant people can also be brilliantly wrong. Especially so outside of their fields of expertise. Regards, .. .. > > Posted by: " Gracia " circe@... > <mailto:circe@...?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Iodine%20triggers%20Hashimoto%27s\ > > graciabee <graciabee> > > > Thu Dec 4, 2008 7:28 pm (PST) > > > I admire brilliant ppl who can recognize other brilliant ppl. > Gracia > > Gracia, > > You wrote: > > > > iodine docs are highly esteemed in the circles I frequent. > > No doubt. > > Arp is highly regarded in his circle. Hardly any of them are > professional astronomers, though. > > Chuck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2008 Report Share Posted December 6, 2008 Chuck, you make my point. Especially about the part of attacking the messenger, not the message. Steve Chuck B wrote: > Steve, > > You wrote: >> ...Arp published the catalog of " Peculiar Galaxies " . His photos and >> measurements kick out one of the legs on which the big bang, and most of >> present cosmology, rest.... > > Halton Arp's 1966 catalog showed pictures of 338 oddly shaped galaxies, > five of which happen to be in front of high red shift quasars. He > claimed the quasars came out of the galaxies, and that their high red > shifts are due to some unknown optical effect. His improper use of > statistics was recognized in ApJ less than a year after his 1966 paper > in Science, but the controversy continued for about 20 years. During > this time evidence accumulated that all of his examples were cases of > accidental alignment. > > The reduction in his observing hours in 1981 happened because he > persisted in chasing peculiar combinations of galaxies with quasars. His > own institutional pre-review told him the same thing as the user group > at the telescope, that his proposals were " repetitive, lacking in focus > and specific goals. " He was warned of this in several reviews, before > they started reducing his time. His choice to keep proposing the same > old thing, that no one thought was productive, let alone relevant, is > what did him in. He then chose to move to Europe. > > Since then, the astronomical community has mostly considered this a > closed issue. Arp is generally considered a crackpot, even more than the > iodine docs. > > Chuck -- Steve - dudescholar4@... Take World's Smallest Political Quiz at http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html " If a thousand old beliefs were ruined on our march to truth we must still march on. " --Stopford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.