Guest guest Posted October 14, 2008 Report Share Posted October 14, 2008 See my message sent at 4:34 pm. Let's not bicker, Chuck. This is a help board. Thank you, Sue On 10/14/08 4:57 PM, " Chuck B " <gumboyaya@...> wrote: > Sue, > > You wrote: >>> >>> What rude remarks? >>> >> Sue: >> >> if you honestly don¹t know, then I can¹t teach you. That was your >> parent¹s job, Chuck. > > Here is the message by which I supposedly aggressively interjected > myself into your conversation on an open list, in its entirety: > > " I know Mike was kidding when he asked you to cite a reference for > this claim, but you really should. The only studies I'm aware of that > showed cardiac risk were when there was an over dose, typically > studied in conditions of " suppression, " deliberate over dosing to hold > a nodule in check in lieu of or until surgery. In the most recent one, > the TSH had to be chronically below 0.1 for three months to see minor > changes in muscle and in bone density. " > > Please point out the name I called you in this. Please explain where > there is any rudeness. > > Your immediate response to this post was to crudely suggest that I was > giving you undue attention due to an intestinal parasite, and that I > should perform some sort of rectal maneuver to remove it and inflict it > on someone else. Now you have chosen to insult my parents while asking > me to desist. > > Chuck > > > >>> >>> Chuck: >>> >>> If there were any clear evidence of such danger, the FDA would take >> Cytomel >>> and Armour off the market. >>> >>> Sue: >>> >>> Ok, that¹s just silly: Cigarettes, artificial sweeteners, and many Rx >> drugs, >>> scanning dyes, and so much more DO have very potential harmful side >> effects ‹ >>> as does T3 ‹ and one must be wiling to take the risk when consuming any >>> substances (especially ones the government deems ³safe²) and be aware >> of the >>> dangers. >>> >>> Chuck: >>> >>> So, does your use of crude language make you feel clever, or is it >> some kind >>> of defense mechanism or compensation? >>> >>> Sue: >>> >>> I don¹t need or use crude language to feel clever. I am here to help, >> learn >>> and share and I feel you are a huge thorn in my side. It¹s my >> prerogative to >>> remove it. >>> >>> Again, I ask you to simply stop. >>> >>> Sue >>> >> >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 14, 2008 Report Share Posted October 14, 2008 Chuck is neither bickering nor being passive-aggressive. One must assume at this point that the references that Chuck asked for do not exist. I'm personally interested in the references. My rt3/t3 ratio is less than 20 and I'd like to know what the quantifiable risks on the heart are to taking t3 only medications. All I've heard so far is an assertion that it's hard on the heart. If that assertion is true, the research no doubt must exist that the t3 in Amour is hard on the heart and synthetic t4 makers would be using that as ammunition. What exactly are the quantifiable hazards/risk to using t3 aside from the obvious risks of overdosing? Steve eastodurango@... wrote: > See my message sent at 4:34 pm. > Let's not bicker, Chuck. > This is a help board. > > Thank you, > Sue > > On 10/14/08 4:57 PM, " Chuck B " <gumboyaya@...> wrote: > >> Sue, >> >> You wrote: >>>> What rude remarks? >>>> >>> Sue: >>> >>> if you honestly don¹t know, then I can¹t teach you. That was your >>> parent¹s job, Chuck. >> Here is the message by which I supposedly aggressively interjected >> myself into your conversation on an open list, in its entirety: >> >> " I know Mike was kidding when he asked you to cite a reference for >> this claim, but you really should. The only studies I'm aware of that >> showed cardiac risk were when there was an over dose, typically >> studied in conditions of " suppression, " deliberate over dosing to hold >> a nodule in check in lieu of or until surgery. In the most recent one, >> the TSH had to be chronically below 0.1 for three months to see minor >> changes in muscle and in bone density. " >> >> Please point out the name I called you in this. Please explain where >> there is any rudeness. >> >> Your immediate response to this post was to crudely suggest that I was >> giving you undue attention due to an intestinal parasite, and that I >> should perform some sort of rectal maneuver to remove it and inflict it >> on someone else. Now you have chosen to insult my parents while asking >> me to desist. >> >> Chuck -- Steve - dudescholar4@... Take World's Smallest Political Quiz at http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html " If a thousand old beliefs were ruined on our march to truth we must still march on. " --Stopford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.