Re: INCREASING QUALITY OF LIVE AND PRODUCTIVITY OF OUR NATION!

[Guest guest]

OH, you think they're COMPLAINING about spending those trillions? I thought they were BRAGGING!

Money makes the world go round.

----- Original Message -----

From: galaxyhal@...

low dose naltrexone

Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 17:21

Subject: [low dose naltrexone] INCREASING QUALITY OF LIVE AND PRODUCTIVITY OF OUR NATION!

Release to President Bush, various representatives and senators and over 300 media outlets in the midwest.Please write the Whitehouse and Your Representatives.If you want to create jobs, try creating jobs in the "basic medical research" area to increase the chances of developing "cures" and "preventions". If we can develop more "cures" and "prevention's", total healthcare costs of $1.65 trillion will be reduced. Today, doctors are relying more on "palliative" treatments which is expensive. For example, people with MS pay $1000 to $1500 per month for "palliative" treatments consisting primarily of the "ABCR" drugs.

[Guest guest]

The problem with this message--and it's a big one in terms of your message's credibility, I should think--lies in the last two sentences. Palliative treatments are those which relieve pain, symptoms, and unpleasant side effects. That is NOT what the ABCRs do. The ABCRs are neither prevention nor cure, true, but they are not palliative, either. They are intended to slow or halt the progression of MS. I'd change this letter before sending it all over the place.

Galoux

Release to President Bush, various representatives and senators and over 300 media outlets in the midwest.Please write the Whitehouse and Your Representatives.If you want to create jobs, try creating jobs in the "basic medical research" area to increase the chances of developing "cures" and "preventions". If we can develop more "cures" and "prevention's", total healthcare costs of $1.65 trillion will be reduced. Today, doctors are relying more on "palliative" treatments which is expensive. For example, people with MS pay $1000 to $1500 per month for "palliative" treatments consisting primarily of the "ABCR" drugs.

[Guest guest]

to Galoux and everyone-- my son was on Avonex for one year-- He went completely downhill in the last 6 months of the treatment-- elevated liver enzymes ,sick all the time, etc. It wasn't until he started LDN 4years ago that he turned around-- LDN completely stopped his progression, then 75% raw food diet and digestive ( with meals)AND systemic ( on empty stomach) enzymes gave the added boost--The ABC-R drugs are NOT the answer. Helen RN----- Original Message -----

From: Bou

low dose naltrexone

Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 9:01 AM

Subject: Re: [low dose naltrexone] INCREASING QUALITY OF LIVE AND PRODUCTIVITY OF OUR NATION!

The problem with this message--and it's a big one in terms of your message's credibility, I should think--lies in the last two sentences. Palliative treatments are those which relieve pain, symptoms, and unpleasant side effects. That is NOT what the ABCRs do. The ABCRs are neither prevention nor cure, true, but they are not palliative, either. They are intended to slow or halt the progression of MS. I'd change this letter before sending it all over the place.

Galoux

Release to President Bush, various representatives and senators and over 300 media outlets in the midwest.Please write the Whitehouse and Your Representatives.If you want to create jobs, try creating jobs in the "basic medical research" area to increase the chances of developing "cures" and "preventions". If we can develop more "cures" and "prevention's", total healthcare costs of $1.65 trillion will be reduced. Today, doctors are relying more on "palliative" treatments which is expensive. For example, people with MS pay $1000 to $1500 per month for "palliative" treatments consisting primarily of the "ABCR" drugs.

[Guest guest]

Did he have elevated neutralizing antibodies?

Dan

----- Original Message -----

From: Helen Hecker

low dose naltrexone

Sent: 2/6/2004 10:45:16 AM

Subject: Re: [low dose naltrexone] INCREASING QUALITY OF LIVE AND PRODUCTIVITY OF OUR NATION!

to Galoux and everyone-- my son was on Avonex for one year-- He went completely downhill in the last 6 months of the treatment-- elevated liver enzymes ,sick all the time, etc. It wasn't until he started LDN 4years ago that he turned around-- LDN completely stopped his progression, then 75% raw food diet and digestive ( with meals)AND systemic ( on empty stomach) enzymes gave the added boost--The ABC-R drugs are NOT the answer. Helen RN----- Original Message -----

From: Bou

low dose naltrexone

Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 9:01 AM

Subject: Re: [low dose naltrexone] INCREASING QUALITY OF LIVE AND PRODUCTIVITY OF OUR NATION!

The problem with this message--and it's a big one in terms of your message's credibility, I should think--lies in the last two sentences. Palliative treatments are those which relieve pain, symptoms, and unpleasant side effects. That is NOT what the ABCRs do. The ABCRs are neither prevention nor cure, true, but they are not palliative, either. They are intended to slow or halt the progression of MS. I'd change this letter before sending it all over the place.

Galoux

Release to President Bush, various representatives and senators and over 300 media outlets in the midwest.Please write the Whitehouse and Your Representatives.If you want to create jobs, try creating jobs in the "basic medical research" area to increase the chances of developing "cures" and "preventions". If we can develop more "cures" and "prevention's", total healthcare costs of $1.65 trillion will be reduced. Today, doctors are relying more on "palliative" treatments which is expensive. For example, people with MS pay $1000 to $1500 per month for "palliative" treatments consisting primarily of the "ABCR" drugs.

[Guest guest]

Helen, I am glad for your son, of course. And if I didn't believe in LDN, I would not be taking it. But to extrapolate from one case--or even the dozens we read about here--that "ABCR drugs are not the answer" is just not good science. And if you're an RN, you already know that.

Galoux

to Galoux and everyone-- my son was on Avonex for one year-- He went completely downhill in the last 6 months of the treatment-- elevated liver enzymes ,sick all the time, etc. It wasn't until he started LDN 4years ago that he turned around-- LDN completely stopped his progression, then 75% raw food diet and digestive ( with meals)AND systemic ( on empty stomach) enzymes gave the added boost--The ABC-R drugs are NOT the answer. Helen RN----- Original Message -----