Guest guest Posted January 17, 2008 Report Share Posted January 17, 2008 Without reasearch to back up that statement about bio identical sex hormones, there is no validity to it. Given that I have two neighbors, one 57 and right next door - the other 3 doors down with breast cancer and prior users of bio's - you can't convince me of anything. I see the living proof (or half alive in the case of the gal 3 doors down who is now in her 4th month of chemo). The lady next door had a double mastectomy. My sister (hysterectomized for endometriosis) was given bio's to restore her ability to engage in a sex life and the endo, even without a uterus, began flourishing again in her . You gotta stop giving folks untruths or unsubstantiated info. Your comments can be VERY dangerous to many people. And Sam, just so you know, I use sex bio's myself - but have chosen to do so because of a medical condition I developed without them - called vulvodynia. I KNOW the risks I am taking - too many of the others who join this list aren't well read on the difficult issues of supplementing with bio's or any other form of hormones. Dusty Re: /Painful breasts > > > > Correct in that synthetic sex hormones are bad bad bad news. > WIH study only looked at synthetic sex hormones, not at any of the > bio-identicals. So far the bio-identicals have proven to be safe as > long as they are not abused as in the wiley protocol which > recommended huge overdosages of progesterone and estradiol. > > Sam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.